User talk:Trogga - Revision history

Tom: Reverted edits by Vampire Snuffleupagus (Talk) to last revision by Chipwich

Tom — Sat, 19 Dec 2009 03:14:58 GMT

Reverted edits by Vampire Snuffleupagus (Talk) to last revision by Chipwich

← Older revision		Revision as of 03:14, 19 December 2009
Line 2:		Line 2:
	Where is everybody? There is not a thing here, nor on this guy's user page!!!		Where is everybody? There is not a thing here, nor on this guy's user page!!!
	Unless it is my stupid browser again...		Unless it is my stupid browser again...
-
-	~~== Hello, I'm Mr. Snuffleupagus ==~~
-
-	A vampire snuffleupagus, that is! ''{opens mouth wide with fangs showing, eyes turn red}'' RARRRGGHH! Believe it or not, I'm a ''big'' monster, and I'm way scarier than [[Trogdor]]! --[[User:Vampire Snuffleupagus\|Vampire Snuffleupagus]] 03:13, 19 December 2009 (UTC)

Vampire Snuffleupagus at 03:13, 19 December 2009

Vampire Snuffleupagus — Sat, 19 Dec 2009 03:13:19 GMT

← Older revision		Revision as of 03:13, 19 December 2009
Line 2:		Line 2:
	Where is everybody? There is not a thing here, nor on this guy's user page!!!		Where is everybody? There is not a thing here, nor on this guy's user page!!!
	Unless it is my stupid browser again...		Unless it is my stupid browser again...
		+
		+	== Hello, I'm Mr. Snuffleupagus ==
		+
		+	A vampire snuffleupagus, that is! ''{opens mouth wide with fangs showing, eyes turn red}'' RARRRGGHH! Believe it or not, I'm a ''big'' monster, and I'm way scarier than [[Trogdor]]! --[[User:Vampire Snuffleupagus\|Vampire Snuffleupagus]] 03:13, 19 December 2009 (UTC)

Chipwich at 00:11, 21 April 2008

Chipwich — Mon, 21 Apr 2008 00:11:01 GMT

← Older revision	Revision as of 00:11, 21 April 2008
Line 1:	Line 1:
-	+	==ummmmmmmmm kay?==
	+	Where is everybody? There is not a thing here, nor on this guy's user page!!!
	+	Unless it is my stupid browser again...

It's dot com: we don't delete talk pages, but we can blank it if you like

It's dot com — Wed, 19 Dec 2007 20:35:29 GMT

we don't delete talk pages, but we can blank it if you like

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:35, 19 December 2007
Line 1:		Line 1:
-	~~{{delete\|It is a user talk page requested to be deleted by the user with whom it is associated}}~~	+

Trogga: replaced the page with '{{delete|It is a user talk page requested to be deleted by the user with whom it is associated}}'

Trogga — Wed, 19 Dec 2007 19:49:59 GMT

replaced the page with '{{delete|It is a user talk page requested to be deleted by the user with whom it is associated}}'

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:49, 19 December 2007
Line 1:		Line 1:
-	~~== Derailed Emails ==~~	+	{{delete\|It is a user talk page requested to be deleted by the user with whom it is associated}}
-		+
-	~~Hey Trogga, I saw you deleted the "derailed email" "inside references" from all articles. I agree that these aren't inside references, but what is your reasoning for deleting them completely?~~{{~~User:Loafing/sig}} 03:45, 18 December 2007 (UTC)~~	+
-	~~:Like I said in one of my edit summaries, we don't note when a email~~ is ~~[[poorly written emails\|poorly written]] on~~ a ~~email~~ page~~. --[[User:Trogga\|Trogga]] 05:42, 18 December 2007 (UTC)~~	+
-	~~::Hmmm, but isn't that a completely different beast? Emails aren't written poorly~~ by ~~TBC, but when Strong Bad ignores~~ the ~~contents of an email or does the opposite of what the email asks, then that~~ is ~~a relevant pattern that should be noted in the article, imho.{{User:Loafing/sig~~}} ~~10:17, 18 December 2007 (UTC)~~	+
-	~~:::It just seems like one of those "so what?" facts. --[[User:Trogga\|Trogga]] 17:04, 18 December 2007 (UTC)~~	+
-	~~::::That's very subjective. To me, it's an interesting fact.{{User:Loafing/sig}} 08:23, 19 December 2007 (UTC)~~	+
-		+
-	~~== Spanish ==~~	+
-		+
-	To answer [http://www.hrwiki.org/index.php?title=Subtitles:underconstruction/es&curid=38960&diff=528562&oldid=528553 your question], yes, I speak Spanish. Fluently. {{User:OptimisticFool/sig}} 18:06, 18 December 2007 (UTC)	+
-	~~:Sorry. --[[User:Trogga\|Trogga]] 18:09, 18 December 2007 (UTC)~~	+

Loafing: /* Derailed Emails */ um, so?

Loafing — Wed, 19 Dec 2007 08:23:14 GMT

Derailed Emails: um, so?

← Older revision		Revision as of 08:23, 19 December 2007
Line 5:		Line 5:
	::Hmmm, but isn't that a completely different beast? Emails aren't written poorly by TBC, but when Strong Bad ignores the contents of an email or does the opposite of what the email asks, then that is a relevant pattern that should be noted in the article, imho.{{User:Loafing/sig}} 10:17, 18 December 2007 (UTC)		::Hmmm, but isn't that a completely different beast? Emails aren't written poorly by TBC, but when Strong Bad ignores the contents of an email or does the opposite of what the email asks, then that is a relevant pattern that should be noted in the article, imho.{{User:Loafing/sig}} 10:17, 18 December 2007 (UTC)
	:::It just seems like one of those "so what?" facts. --[[User:Trogga\|Trogga]] 17:04, 18 December 2007 (UTC)		:::It just seems like one of those "so what?" facts. --[[User:Trogga\|Trogga]] 17:04, 18 December 2007 (UTC)
		+	::::That's very subjective. To me, it's an interesting fact.{{User:Loafing/sig}} 08:23, 19 December 2007 (UTC)

	== Spanish ==		== Spanish ==

Trogga: /* Spanish */

Trogga — Tue, 18 Dec 2007 18:09:07 GMT

Spanish

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:09, 18 December 2007
Line 9:		Line 9:

	To answer [http://www.hrwiki.org/index.php?title=Subtitles:underconstruction/es&curid=38960&diff=528562&oldid=528553 your question], yes, I speak Spanish. Fluently. {{User:OptimisticFool/sig}} 18:06, 18 December 2007 (UTC)		To answer [http://www.hrwiki.org/index.php?title=Subtitles:underconstruction/es&curid=38960&diff=528562&oldid=528553 your question], yes, I speak Spanish. Fluently. {{User:OptimisticFool/sig}} 18:06, 18 December 2007 (UTC)
		+	:Sorry. --[[User:Trogga\|Trogga]] 18:09, 18 December 2007 (UTC)

OptimisticFool: /**/Spanish

OptimisticFool — Tue, 18 Dec 2007 18:06:21 GMT

: Spanish

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:06, 18 December 2007
Line 5:		Line 5:
	::Hmmm, but isn't that a completely different beast? Emails aren't written poorly by TBC, but when Strong Bad ignores the contents of an email or does the opposite of what the email asks, then that is a relevant pattern that should be noted in the article, imho.{{User:Loafing/sig}} 10:17, 18 December 2007 (UTC)		::Hmmm, but isn't that a completely different beast? Emails aren't written poorly by TBC, but when Strong Bad ignores the contents of an email or does the opposite of what the email asks, then that is a relevant pattern that should be noted in the article, imho.{{User:Loafing/sig}} 10:17, 18 December 2007 (UTC)
	:::It just seems like one of those "so what?" facts. --[[User:Trogga\|Trogga]] 17:04, 18 December 2007 (UTC)		:::It just seems like one of those "so what?" facts. --[[User:Trogga\|Trogga]] 17:04, 18 December 2007 (UTC)
		+
		+	== Spanish ==
		+
		+	To answer [http://www.hrwiki.org/index.php?title=Subtitles:underconstruction/es&curid=38960&diff=528562&oldid=528553 your question], yes, I speak Spanish. Fluently. {{User:OptimisticFool/sig}} 18:06, 18 December 2007 (UTC)

Trogga: /* Derailed Emails */

Trogga — Tue, 18 Dec 2007 17:04:07 GMT

Derailed Emails

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:04, 18 December 2007
Line 4:		Line 4:
	:Like I said in one of my edit summaries, we don't note when a email is [[poorly written emails\|poorly written]] on a email page. --[[User:Trogga\|Trogga]] 05:42, 18 December 2007 (UTC)		:Like I said in one of my edit summaries, we don't note when a email is [[poorly written emails\|poorly written]] on a email page. --[[User:Trogga\|Trogga]] 05:42, 18 December 2007 (UTC)
	::Hmmm, but isn't that a completely different beast? Emails aren't written poorly by TBC, but when Strong Bad ignores the contents of an email or does the opposite of what the email asks, then that is a relevant pattern that should be noted in the article, imho.{{User:Loafing/sig}} 10:17, 18 December 2007 (UTC)		::Hmmm, but isn't that a completely different beast? Emails aren't written poorly by TBC, but when Strong Bad ignores the contents of an email or does the opposite of what the email asks, then that is a relevant pattern that should be noted in the article, imho.{{User:Loafing/sig}} 10:17, 18 December 2007 (UTC)
		+	:::It just seems like one of those "so what?" facts. --[[User:Trogga\|Trogga]] 17:04, 18 December 2007 (UTC)

Loafing: /* Derailed Emails */ yeah, but

Loafing — Tue, 18 Dec 2007 10:17:40 GMT

Derailed Emails: yeah, but

← Older revision		Revision as of 10:17, 18 December 2007
Line 3:		Line 3:
	Hey Trogga, I saw you deleted the "derailed email" "inside references" from all articles. I agree that these aren't inside references, but what is your reasoning for deleting them completely?{{User:Loafing/sig}} 03:45, 18 December 2007 (UTC)		Hey Trogga, I saw you deleted the "derailed email" "inside references" from all articles. I agree that these aren't inside references, but what is your reasoning for deleting them completely?{{User:Loafing/sig}} 03:45, 18 December 2007 (UTC)
	:Like I said in one of my edit summaries, we don't note when a email is [[poorly written emails\|poorly written]] on a email page. --[[User:Trogga\|Trogga]] 05:42, 18 December 2007 (UTC)		:Like I said in one of my edit summaries, we don't note when a email is [[poorly written emails\|poorly written]] on a email page. --[[User:Trogga\|Trogga]] 05:42, 18 December 2007 (UTC)
		+	::Hmmm, but isn't that a completely different beast? Emails aren't written poorly by TBC, but when Strong Bad ignores the contents of an email or does the opposite of what the email asks, then that is a relevant pattern that should be noted in the article, imho.{{User:Loafing/sig}} 10:17, 18 December 2007 (UTC)