Talk:kids' book

(Difference between revisions)

Revision as of 15:36, 5 April 2006

This is my favorite SB Email. Yep.

The cover looks waterproofed, like some little kids' books are. It looks like someone's drooled on it, too. (Baby Strong Sad?)

He strongly resembles Coach Z's dragon from.... dragon What do yall think....--Adamlw 18:16, 23 Aug 2005 (UTC)

Is fangorious a real word? I doubt it, but I would like to double check before I start using it.

It's a neologism, or a made-up word. So whether it's "real" or not depends on your definition of real. - Qermaq - (^T/C)

15:35, 5 April 2006 (UTC)

It's not in my dictionary, and Google only finds Homestar references... seems not. --phlip ^T_C 15:36, 5 April 2006 (UTC)

Revision as of 15:35, 5 April 2006 (edit) Qermaq (Talk \| contribs) (→Fangoriously) ← Older edit		Revision as of 15:36, 5 April 2006 (edit) (undo) Phlip (Talk \| contribs) (→Fangoriously: edit conflict'd) Newer edit →
Line 16:		Line 16:

	:It's a [http://www.langmaker.com/db/Eng_fangorious.htm neologism], or a made-up word. So whether it's "real" or not depends on your definition of real. {{User:Qermaq/sig}} 15:35, 5 April 2006 (UTC)		:It's a [http://www.langmaker.com/db/Eng_fangorious.htm neologism], or a made-up word. So whether it's "real" or not depends on your definition of real. {{User:Qermaq/sig}} 15:35, 5 April 2006 (UTC)
		+
		+	:It's not in my dictionary, and Google only finds Homestar references... seems not. {{User:Phlip/sig}} 15:36, 5 April 2006 (UTC)