Homestar Runner Wiki - User contributions [en]

User talk:Scalawag

2007-01-30T23:32:28Z

Scalawag:

Solicitations are more then welcome. [[User:Scalawag|Scalawag]] 21:22, 30 January 2007 (UTC)

== Using Show Preview ==
Hello Scalawag, I see that you have made several consecutive edits to the same page. I want to point out the Show Preview button. It's right next to the Save Page button when you edit. You should use it whenever you are making a lot of experimental edits, for example when you are trying to get formatting right. Using the Show Preview button is quicker and easier than saving and clicking "edit" again, and will keep [[Special:Recentchanges|recent changes]] and page histories from being flooded. Thanks, {{User:Invisible_Robot_Fish/sig}} 23:30, 30 January 2007 (UTC)
:The Show Preview button is my best friend, but I had to do Save over and over to make sure my signature fit in the signature box. — {{User:Scalawag/sig}}

User:Scalawag/sig

2007-01-30T22:57:39Z

Scalawag:

"I-T-apostrophe-S," [[User:scalawag|scalawag]]

User:Scalawag/sig

2007-01-30T22:57:18Z

Scalawag:

"I-T-apostrophe-S," [[User:scalawag|scalawag]]

<noinclude>{{sigbox|User:Scalawag/sig}}</noinclude>

User:Scalawag/sig

2007-01-30T22:55:21Z

Scalawag:

obey grammar rules,[[User:scalawag|scalawag]]

<noinclude>{{sigbox|User:Scalawag/sig}}</noinclude>

User:Scalawag/sig

2007-01-30T22:53:43Z

Scalawag:

"I-T-apostrophe-S, [[User:scalawag|scalawag]]"

{{sigbox|User:Scalawag/sig}}</noinclude>

User:Scalawag/sig

2007-01-30T22:53:11Z

Scalawag:

"I-T-apostrophe-S, [[User:scalawag|''scalawag'']]"<noinclude>

{{sigbox|User:Scalawag/sig}}</noinclude>

User:Scalawag/sig

2007-01-30T22:48:16Z

Scalawag:

—"I-T-apostrophe-S, [[User:scalawag|''scalawag'']]"

{{sigbox|User:Scalawag/sig})

User:Scalawag/sig

2007-01-30T22:45:49Z

Scalawag:

—"I-T-apostrophe-S, [[User:scalawag|scalawag]]"

{{sigbox|User:Scalawag/sig})

User:Scalawag/sig

2007-01-30T22:44:49Z

Scalawag:

—"I-T-apostrophe-S,[[User:scalawag|
scalawag]]"

User:Scalawag/sig

2007-01-30T22:43:48Z

Scalawag:

—"I-T-apostrophe-S,[[User:scalawag|
scalawag]]"

Talk:halloweener

2007-01-30T22:19:43Z

Scalawag:

== Boring Email! ==

Guys, I gotta level with ya. This is probably...the most boring email rap I have ever heard. No cool rhymes, songs, headbanging, or even silly ditty. Nothin' but "I am going to check my email." Probably on purpose. But I wanted to point it out. --[[User:Bellatrix|Bellatrix]] 21:58, 1 Dec 2004 (MST)

:This is also the only case where Strong Bad has no unique email opening line.

== Bell vs. Belle ==

It says in da transcript that Homestar says "I'm a belle", but I always thought that he was saying "I'm a BELL". You know, cuz he's too dumb to know what the term belle of the ball means, so he just thought Strong Bad was talkin' 'bout a bell as in "ding dong". Any thoughts?
-[[User:Miss Free Country USA|I don't feel like typing my name I mean oh wait typing this took longer anyway, bye.]]
*Yeah, uh, random conjecture is bad. There's no reason whatsoever to believe that Homestar is saying "bell" over "belle" - none - so we should keep it consistent with what Strong Bad CLEARLY said. --[[User:Jay|Jay]] 18:00, 16 Apr 2005 (UTC)

==Costume or Not?==

It lists this as a costume for Homestar, but Strong Bad says that the final step is to "Get your mom to make you a Strong Bad costume", so should that be removed from the [[Other Costumes]] page?

== Weird! ==

The Email Song in this email shoulda been used for the first email.

==Twine?==

Most of the costume made some sense, but the only part I didn't get was the twine. Can anyway make any sort of sense from that? — [[User:Scalawag|Scalawag]] 22:19, 30 January 2007 (UTC)

User:Scalawag

2007-01-30T22:04:40Z

Scalawag:

----
'''"Ohhhhhhh ... If you want it to be possessive, it's just "I-T-S." But, if it's supposed to be a contraction, then it's "I-T-apostrophe-S," scalawag."'''
 - [[local news]]
----

User talk:DorianGray/Analysis of Homsar's Speech Patterns

2007-01-30T21:36:18Z

Scalawag: /* Something I'm missing? */

Nice project: I don't want to add anything you don't like, but here is my thoughts:
*"AaAaAaAaAaAaA!!! I'm saving the best for last!" - One scorpion goes into his mouth and I guess he likes to eat them.
*"I'm the ghost of Christmas past." - He is dressed as '''Ghost''' Dog, and mixing with another holiday.
*"And also with you." - He is insulted and tells Homestar that ''he'' doesn't get a ding in reply.
*"I do what I'm told..." - as you wrote: Strong Bad had just '''told''' him to get outta his house.
I don't have much time today to go over the transcripts you didn't add, so this is it for now. {{User:E.L. Cool/sig}} 08:09, 8 July 2006 (UTC)

== I've brought my best foot flowered ==
I think "I've brought my best foot flowered" could make sense if he meant to say "I'm putting my best foot ''forward''", i.e., he's trying to make a good impression with his character video. — [[User:It's dot com|It's dot com]] 23:49, 8 July 2006 (UTC)
:That's possible. {{User:KieferSkunk/sig}} 06:48, 9 July 2006 (UTC)
:Makes lots of sense to me. [[User:Scalawag|Scalawag]] 21:28, 30 January 2007 (UTC)

== Something I'm missing? ==

This article seems unnecessary, very POV, and over-analytical, even for us. I wouldn't be sad to see it go, but, for the time being, I'm not putting a tbd notice on it. --{{User:Jay/sig}} 20:05, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
:It was created to directly refute information contained both here and at Wikipedia. It furthers the project because it systematically analyzes a central trait of a central character. It's in the main namespace because it should belong to everyone (yes, works in progress on user subpages can technically be edited by anyone, but it's just not the same); that way, it can be improved upon and maintained by the whole community. It only seems POV because it seeks to draw conclusions, but the process by which it reaches those conclusions attempts to be objective. — [[User:It's dot com|It's dot com]] 20:37, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
::We have an NPOV policy now? {{User:ACupOfCoffee/sig}} 21:25, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
:::I don't know whether it's ever been written as such on any policy pages, but it seems like a knowledge base should be as unbiased as possible. Occasionally "NPOV" can be seen in edit summaries as reasons for changing or removing something. As for the article, I think certain phrases could be reworded to be more straightforward and less of an opinion. I'll work on that a little now. — [[User:It's dot com|It's dot com]] 21:39, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
:This article can go to really speculative levels, with all those interpatations. How do we know that The Brothers Chaps meant all that? {{User:E.L. Cool/sig}} 21:51, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
::I disagree. I'm not saying there's no speculation; I'm just saying that it's based on observation and reason. We allow a certain amount of speculation in fun facts and articles as long as it's relevant and reasonable and if the article would suffer if we left it out. This research page does have a bit more latitude, but that's understandable given its scope. Although it does give an interpretation at the bottom (which, like everything else, can be edited according to consensus), by and large it just presents the facts. No one claims to be able to read TBC's minds, but as long as we don't invent wild, irrelevant theories, then we're good. — [[User:It's dot com|It's dot com]] 22:24, 12 July 2006 (UTC)

:::My point in doing this analysis was, as It's dot com mentioned, to objectively observe what Homsar is saying and relate it to the scene in which he said it. In many cases, you can clearly see the connection between his statement and what's going on, and in the cases where that connection ISN'T clear (or there doesn't appear to be one at all), interpretation is limited mainly to "There doesn't appear to be a connection, but this sentence is syntactically valid/correct on its own", etc. I removed as much POV stuff from the article as I could when I moved it to the main namespace. {{User:KieferSkunk/sig}} 23:04, 12 July 2006 (UTC)

: I'm taking another look at it, and... I want to say that maybe I feel stronger than before that this page is ridiculous. Half of Homsar's sentences have descriptions that say "This could make sense," frequently without describing how or by reaching for related words and twisting it a bit. Well, yeah... they could. So? They also very easily could be random nonsense. Por example:
::''"Nowowowow, this is the thrill of a lifetime."''
::''The other characters all said some variation of "Happy T!", but Homsar's line could still be construed to make some sense.''
:That this says that he could make some sense makes no sense, at least to me. Could you at least explain it a little? Is it because he's "thrilled" to be part of the Happy T stuff? Because he says three words that start with the letter "T"? Perhaps it's not a word salad because it would make sense in a totally different context, but in this context, it's meaningless as far as I can easily see. This page is trying to make insanity seem sane, to feign order in chaos, and to hear dialogue in ramblings. I don't believe it has any place in this Wiki. --{{User:Jay/sig}} 19:49, 31 October 2006 (UTC)
::Even if this ''is'' overanalytical, we can also argue that the entire wiki is pointless because it's all to analyze an internet cartoon. I bet TBC didn't even imagine that it would go this far. Not to say that I'm against this site, I find it endlessly amusing. —'''xo''' [[User:Scalawag|Scalawag]]

== It's time for tasteball ==

Homestar responds as though he's just informing them that they have to go do something right then. Seems pretty non-random to me. {{User:ACupOfCoffee/sig}} 21:34, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
:Excellent point. I'm going to update the article. — [[User:It's dot com|It's dot com]] 22:25, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
::It seems more to me that it's general Homsar's randomness, but Homestar's too obtuse to notice and thinks Homsar's serious... which would be in character for both of them... {{User:Phlip/sig}} 16:35, 16 July 2006 (UTC)

== Butterfly effect ==

What I'm about to say could easily be said on a lot of pages (and I don't intend it to be a forum-style topic), but it seems particularly appropriate here, given the amount of time and energy that have gone into the character of Homsar, both on TBC's part to create him, make him entertaining, and make merchandise about him, and on our part to enjoy it all and analyze obscure patterns in minute detail. What if Vinnie had been a better proof-reader? The world would be a vastly different place. — [[User:It's dot com|It's dot com]] 00:02, 13 July 2006 (UTC)
:Wow... Really makes you think, eh? I never thought I'd be glad for misspellings... --[[User:DorianGray|DorianGray]]
::True, though if he didn't come about, Homestar would probably just be alot weirder to compensate, or something. I'm sure it would probably still be a pretty similar site. {{User:Thunderbird L17/Siggie}} 00:18, 13 July 2006 (UTC)
:::It would be weird. I mean, there would be no [[interview]], [[Strong Sad]] would be even more lonesome, and there would be no regular use for that "b-b-b-b-b-b-b" sound that Homsar makes while walking. I'm sure someone would have slipped up eventually, inadvertantly creating Hoesta or Ometar or something. --[[User:Jnelson09|Jnelson09]] 00:42, 16 July 2006 (UTC)
::::I would doubt that Vinnie's was the only email that misspelled Homestar's name; TBC probably picked his from a handful of emails containing mispellings, like "Homstar", "Hometar", etc. (this is somewhat speculative, though) {{User:Trey56/sig}} 20:40, 25 July 2006 (UTC)
:::::I still think his foil ought to be Stong Bad

== Strong Sad's Blog And An Email ==

What about in Strong Sad's Blog where Strong Sad writes that one day when he was talking to Homsar, Homsar kept saying, "When can we start the Jeffersons?" In the blog it's also mentioned that at a party Homsar told Strong Sad to hug a tree. While no quotes, it would be interesting to point out in summary that Homsar's language skills seem to let him organize a party. And finally, Strong Sad in [[2 emails]] tells Strong Bad that Homsar called and said he was a million ladies tall. -[[User:WarthogDemon|WarthogDemon]] 07:02, 6 October 2006 (UTC)

== Cleanup ==

I propose we have another look at this article for the sake of improving it. Last time people were regularly discussing it, there were some serious concerns as to its merit. I find this article to be very useful, but like some who have raised objections above, I am concerned about some sections of it. Quite simply, I think sometimes this article tries too hard to make sense of Homsar's sentences. As an example, this explanation of the phrase "I'm a million ladies tall":
<blockquote>
Not really a word salad as Homsar's statement could be interpreted as, "I'm as tall as any of those ladies."
</blockquote>
seems to me to be sretching it to the breaking point. I realise that part of this is because this study was originally made in order to refute the notion that Homsar speaks in word salads, but now that this point has been effectively made, I think the article needs to be reworked to a more neutral perspective. I intend to start work on this soon, and would value any help and input anyone would like to give. {{User:Heimstern Läufer/sig}} 03:41, 22 October 2006 (UTC)
:OK, finally trying to do this. So, I made that last edit in the hopes of preserving the original analysis while changing the tone a bit so it doesn't sound as much like it's fishing for sense in Homsar's statements but rather acknowledges both what sense there is and that it still doesn't really fit the context. {{User:Heimstern Läufer/sig}} 23:59, 23 November 2006 (UTC)

==I'll pay you tuesday==
This is a rephrasing of a quote from J. Wellington Wimpy (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/J._Wellington_Wimpy)
"I'd gladly pay you Tuesday for a hamburger today"
So this puts Homsars quote into even more context.
--[[User:Gerkuman|Gerkuman]] 12:01, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
:We've always noted this quote as a Real World Reference, so I don't unstand the point that you are making. {{User:Invisible_Robot_Fish/sig}} 12:44, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
:: <s>That it's not mentioned on THIS page. The page implies that the comment was only slightly in context.</s> Oops, big mistake. Sorry Guys. --[[User:Gerkuman|Gerkuman]] 13:08, 4 December 2006 (UTC)

User talk:DorianGray/Analysis of Homsar's Speech Patterns

2007-01-30T21:28:28Z

Scalawag: /* I've brought my best foot flowered */

Nice project: I don't want to add anything you don't like, but here is my thoughts:
*"AaAaAaAaAaAaA!!! I'm saving the best for last!" - One scorpion goes into his mouth and I guess he likes to eat them.
*"I'm the ghost of Christmas past." - He is dressed as '''Ghost''' Dog, and mixing with another holiday.
*"And also with you." - He is insulted and tells Homestar that ''he'' doesn't get a ding in reply.
*"I do what I'm told..." - as you wrote: Strong Bad had just '''told''' him to get outta his house.
I don't have much time today to go over the transcripts you didn't add, so this is it for now. {{User:E.L. Cool/sig}} 08:09, 8 July 2006 (UTC)

== I've brought my best foot flowered ==
I think "I've brought my best foot flowered" could make sense if he meant to say "I'm putting my best foot ''forward''", i.e., he's trying to make a good impression with his character video. — [[User:It's dot com|It's dot com]] 23:49, 8 July 2006 (UTC)
:That's possible. {{User:KieferSkunk/sig}} 06:48, 9 July 2006 (UTC)
:Makes lots of sense to me. [[User:Scalawag|Scalawag]] 21:28, 30 January 2007 (UTC)

== Something I'm missing? ==

This article seems unnecessary, very POV, and over-analytical, even for us. I wouldn't be sad to see it go, but, for the time being, I'm not putting a tbd notice on it. --{{User:Jay/sig}} 20:05, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
:It was created to directly refute information contained both here and at Wikipedia. It furthers the project because it systematically analyzes a central trait of a central character. It's in the main namespace because it should belong to everyone (yes, works in progress on user subpages can technically be edited by anyone, but it's just not the same); that way, it can be improved upon and maintained by the whole community. It only seems POV because it seeks to draw conclusions, but the process by which it reaches those conclusions attempts to be objective. — [[User:It's dot com|It's dot com]] 20:37, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
::We have an NPOV policy now? {{User:ACupOfCoffee/sig}} 21:25, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
:::I don't know whether it's ever been written as such on any policy pages, but it seems like a knowledge base should be as unbiased as possible. Occasionally "NPOV" can be seen in edit summaries as reasons for changing or removing something. As for the article, I think certain phrases could be reworded to be more straightforward and less of an opinion. I'll work on that a little now. — [[User:It's dot com|It's dot com]] 21:39, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
:This article can go to really speculative levels, with all those interpatations. How do we know that The Brothers Chaps meant all that? {{User:E.L. Cool/sig}} 21:51, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
::I disagree. I'm not saying there's no speculation; I'm just saying that it's based on observation and reason. We allow a certain amount of speculation in fun facts and articles as long as it's relevant and reasonable and if the article would suffer if we left it out. This research page does have a bit more latitude, but that's understandable given its scope. Although it does give an interpretation at the bottom (which, like everything else, can be edited according to consensus), by and large it just presents the facts. No one claims to be able to read TBC's minds, but as long as we don't invent wild, irrelevant theories, then we're good. — [[User:It's dot com|It's dot com]] 22:24, 12 July 2006 (UTC)

:::My point in doing this analysis was, as It's dot com mentioned, to objectively observe what Homsar is saying and relate it to the scene in which he said it. In many cases, you can clearly see the connection between his statement and what's going on, and in the cases where that connection ISN'T clear (or there doesn't appear to be one at all), interpretation is limited mainly to "There doesn't appear to be a connection, but this sentence is syntactically valid/correct on its own", etc. I removed as much POV stuff from the article as I could when I moved it to the main namespace. {{User:KieferSkunk/sig}} 23:04, 12 July 2006 (UTC)

: I'm taking another look at it, and... I want to say that maybe I feel stronger than before that this page is ridiculous. Half of Homsar's sentences have descriptions that say "This could make sense," frequently without describing how or by reaching for related words and twisting it a bit. Well, yeah... they could. So? They also very easily could be random nonsense. Por ejample:
::''"Nowowowow, this is the thrill of a lifetime."''
::''The other characters all said some variation of "Happy T!", but Homsar's line could still be construed to make some sense.''
:That this says that he could make some sense makes no sense, at least to me. Could you at least explain it a little? Is it because he's "thrilled" to be part of the Happy T stuff? Because he says three words that start with the letter "T"? Perhaps it's not a word salad because it would make sense in a totally different context, but in this context, it's meaningless as far as I can easily see. This page is trying to make insanity seem sane, to feign order in chaos, and to hear dialogue in ramblings. I don't believe it has any place in this Wiki. --{{User:Jay/sig}} 19:49, 31 October 2006 (UTC)

== It's time for tasteball ==

Homestar responds as though he's just informing them that they have to go do something right then. Seems pretty non-random to me. {{User:ACupOfCoffee/sig}} 21:34, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
:Excellent point. I'm going to update the article. — [[User:It's dot com|It's dot com]] 22:25, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
::It seems more to me that it's general Homsar's randomness, but Homestar's too obtuse to notice and thinks Homsar's serious... which would be in character for both of them... {{User:Phlip/sig}} 16:35, 16 July 2006 (UTC)

== Butterfly effect ==

What I'm about to say could easily be said on a lot of pages (and I don't intend it to be a forum-style topic), but it seems particularly appropriate here, given the amount of time and energy that have gone into the character of Homsar, both on TBC's part to create him, make him entertaining, and make merchandise about him, and on our part to enjoy it all and analyze obscure patterns in minute detail. What if Vinnie had been a better proof-reader? The world would be a vastly different place. — [[User:It's dot com|It's dot com]] 00:02, 13 July 2006 (UTC)
:Wow... Really makes you think, eh? I never thought I'd be glad for misspellings... --[[User:DorianGray|DorianGray]]
::True, though if he didn't come about, Homestar would probably just be alot weirder to compensate, or something. I'm sure it would probably still be a pretty similar site. {{User:Thunderbird L17/Siggie}} 00:18, 13 July 2006 (UTC)
:::It would be weird. I mean, there would be no [[interview]], [[Strong Sad]] would be even more lonesome, and there would be no regular use for that "b-b-b-b-b-b-b" sound that Homsar makes while walking. I'm sure someone would have slipped up eventually, inadvertantly creating Hoesta or Ometar or something. --[[User:Jnelson09|Jnelson09]] 00:42, 16 July 2006 (UTC)
::::I would doubt that Vinnie's was the only email that misspelled Homestar's name; TBC probably picked his from a handful of emails containing mispellings, like "Homstar", "Hometar", etc. (this is somewhat speculative, though) {{User:Trey56/sig}} 20:40, 25 July 2006 (UTC)
:::::I still think his foil ought to be Stong Bad

== Strong Sad's Blog And An Email ==

What about in Strong Sad's Blog where Strong Sad writes that one day when he was talking to Homsar, Homsar kept saying, "When can we start the Jeffersons?" In the blog it's also mentioned that at a party Homsar told Strong Sad to hug a tree. While no quotes, it would be interesting to point out in summary that Homsar's language skills seem to let him organize a party. And finally, Strong Sad in [[2 emails]] tells Strong Bad that Homsar called and said he was a million ladies tall. -[[User:WarthogDemon|WarthogDemon]] 07:02, 6 October 2006 (UTC)

== Cleanup ==

I propose we have another look at this article for the sake of improving it. Last time people were regularly discussing it, there were some serious concerns as to its merit. I find this article to be very useful, but like some who have raised objections above, I am concerned about some sections of it. Quite simply, I think sometimes this article tries too hard to make sense of Homsar's sentences. As an example, this explanation of the phrase "I'm a million ladies tall":
<blockquote>
Not really a word salad as Homsar's statement could be interpreted as, "I'm as tall as any of those ladies."
</blockquote>
seems to me to be sretching it to the breaking point. I realise that part of this is because this study was originally made in order to refute the notion that Homsar speaks in word salads, but now that this point has been effectively made, I think the article needs to be reworked to a more neutral perspective. I intend to start work on this soon, and would value any help and input anyone would like to give. {{User:Heimstern Läufer/sig}} 03:41, 22 October 2006 (UTC)
:OK, finally trying to do this. So, I made that last edit in the hopes of preserving the original analysis while changing the tone a bit so it doesn't sound as much like it's fishing for sense in Homsar's statements but rather acknowledges both what sense there is and that it still doesn't really fit the context. {{User:Heimstern Läufer/sig}} 23:59, 23 November 2006 (UTC)

==I'll pay you tuesday==
This is a rephrasing of a quote from J. Wellington Wimpy (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/J._Wellington_Wimpy)
"I'd gladly pay you Tuesday for a hamburger today"
So this puts Homsars quote into even more context.
--[[User:Gerkuman|Gerkuman]] 12:01, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
:We've always noted this quote as a Real World Reference, so I don't unstand the point that you are making. {{User:Invisible_Robot_Fish/sig}} 12:44, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
:: <s>That it's not mentioned on THIS page. The page implies that the comment was only slightly in context.</s> Oops, big mistake. Sorry Guys. --[[User:Gerkuman|Gerkuman]] 13:08, 4 December 2006 (UTC)

User talk:Scalawag

2007-01-30T21:22:52Z

Scalawag: /* Welcome! */

Solicitations are more then welcome. [[User:Scalawag|Scalawag]] 21:22, 30 January 2007 (UTC)

User:Scalawag

2007-01-30T02:55:43Z

Scalawag:

'''"Ohhhhhhh ... If you want it to be possessive, it's just "I-T-S." But, if it's supposed to be a contraction, then it's "I-T-apostrophe-S," scalawag."'''
 - [[local news]]
----
''{Tumbleweed tumbles on by. Homestar and Homsar sit in the desert, looking about. Pans out to reveal a fire, with both holding sticks with marshmellows.}'' 
'''HOMSAR:''' Lonesome prairie, rangermeister. 
'''HOMESTAR:''' You're weird. It's only Scalawag's profile. 
'''HOMSAR:''' You're breathing out the wrong tube, Mr. President. 
'''HOMESTAR:''' You really need to shut up now. I really wish Scalawag would get a-waggin' at learning all this fancy profile making. 
''{The screen implodes. Scalawag has lost all inspiration.}''

User:Scalawag

2007-01-30T02:55:23Z

Scalawag:

'''"Ohhhhhhh ... If you want it to be possessive, it's just "I-T-S." But, if it's supposed to be a contraction, then it's "I-T-apostrophe-S," scalawag."'''
 - [[local news]]

----

''{Tumbleweed tumbles on by. Homestar and Homsar sit in the desert, looking about. Pans out to reveal a fire, with both holding sticks with marshmellows.}'' 
'''HOMSAR:''' Lonesome prairie, rangermeister. 
'''HOMESTAR:''' You're weird. It's only Scalawag's profile. 
'''HOMSAR:''' You're breathing out the wrong tube, Mr. President. 
'''HOMESTAR:''' You really need to shut up now. I really wish Scalawag would get a-waggin' at learning all this fancy profile making. 
''{The screen implodes. Scalawag has lost all inspiration.}''

User talk:Has Matt?

2007-01-30T02:18:46Z

Scalawag:

<center><big>'''''For an archive of past discussions, please go [[User talk:Has Matt?/archive2|here]].'''''</big></center>

<center><big>'''''For an archive of even more past discussions, please go [[User talk:Has Matt?/archive1|there]].'''''</big></center>

==Things I Wish Homsar Would Say==

Feel free to add your own!

*"I shanked the titaniiiiiiiiiic"
*"I'm an original Picasso!"
*"I'm a taco from the future!"
*"Look out! Here I come now!"
*"I live in a broken paddleball!"
*"Everyone's riding the bullet train!"
*"You're a great bargain buy!"
*"My mind is a lumberjack party house!"
*"The squeaky wheel eats the muffin."
*"I'm a traveling salesman!"
*"popcorn is the latest fashion!" {{User: Seriously/sig}}
*"My slipper is a fourteen-foot field goal!"
*"Four score and seven pence ago." --[[User:DorianGray|DorianGray]]
*"I came, I saw, I fried the bacon." --[[User:DorianGray|DorianGray]]
*"All the world's on the back of a tortoise." --[[User:DorianGray|DorianGray]]
*"Lucy, I got some 'splaining to do." --[[User:DorianGray|DorianGray]]
*"I'm a man of quiet intensity." --[[User:DorianGray|DorianGray]]
*"A fatal exception H*R has occurred." --[[User:DorianGray|DorianGray]]
*"You can beat the heat with a pound of meat." --[[User:DorianGray|DorianGray]]
*"I'm a duck looking for a goat ride."
*"It's time to dance the Janger-Beetle."--{{User:SupremeRulerOfSBadia/sig}}
*"Mr. Anderson, I'd like to retract my statement." — {{User:Lapper/sig}}
*"I'm some assembly required." — {{User:Lapper/sig}}
*"Have you talked to the sofa today?" — {{User:Lapper/sig}}
*"I like to help the hamburger."
*"I'm the President of AaAaAaAaAaorange." [[User:Bluebry muffin|Bluebry muffin]] 22:15, 14 January 2006 (UTC)
*"Please don't step on the daisies."
*"Me? The butcher? I'd be happy to incarcerate your petunias." {{User:Teh_Frossty_One/sig}}
*i'ma go get some chocolate buns, lucy. [[User:Thatkidyoualllove|Thatkidyoualllove]] 17:48, 23 January 2006 (UTC)
*When I'm a 64 Elephant man! [[User:Bluebry muffin|Bluebry]] 00:46, 25 January 2006 (UTC)
*"Do you know the muffin man?" {{User:The Chort/sig}} 18:34, 29 January 2006 (UTC)
*"The color of infinity inside ..." {{User:Bluebry muffin/sig}} 23:46, 29 January 2006 (UTC)
*DaAaAaAaAaAaAaAbba dabba dooooooo! [[User:Einstein runner|Einstein runner]]
*"I'm a shipwrecked canolie!"-{{User:Homsarroks/sig}} 03:26, 5 February 2006 (UTC)
*"So then we take the square root of x and apply it to the quadratic formula in order to further signify the anticlimax of this summation."-{{User:Homsarroks/sig}} 03:26, 5 February 2006 (UTC)
*'''Strong Sad''': Why are you strapping Fireworks to me? '''Strong Bad''': Hey, shut up and hold Homsar. '''Homsar''' (seen picketed in the field): AouAH! Now my life has seen its burrito! (Is this breaking rules?) School Egg, 10:5 WST
*No. As for my quote, "Why must the book be later than a soda?" {{User: Seriously/sig}}
*"Why can't we all just get a dog?"
*"My saxophone fell in the drywall"
*"I rule the land of chocolate chip and pickle sandwiches"
*"The third world beckons the sock warriors!" SantamanBOOO! 7:14 EST
*"Is the man larger when he fills a poppy seed cap?" {{User: Seriously/sig}} 02:41, 25 February 2006 (UTC)
*"That disrupts the pattern." {{User:Granola/sig}} 04:58, 5 March 2006 (UTC)
*"AaAaAaAaAaAa, I wish I still had a lungs!"
*"DaAaAaA, happy returns, Admiral!" --[[User:IT'S A LION!|IT'S A LION!]] 17:34, 18 March 2006 (UTC)
*AaAaAaAa, hiiiiii-de-ho, Anakin! Help yourself! These three are halfway backwards. --[[User:IT'S A LION!|IT'S A LION!]] 20:05, 20 March 2006 (UTC)
*"Here comes the princess of Rausten." [[User:Cara Carabowditbowdit|Cara Carabowditbowdit]] 15:40, 12 April 2006 (UTC)
*"Watch OoOout! The windsheild is my basketballlllllll" 17:07 12 April 2006 (UTC)
*You'rrre the pickled jeans of Dr.Smith!!
*"Yorrrrrrgy Shmorrrrrrrrrgy!"
*"If you divide the trajectory of the potato by the keyboard,you'll get the book summary." {{User:SupremeRulerOfSBadia/sig}}]] 00:34, 18 May 2006 (UTC)
*"AaAaAaAaAaA'hm the only one who can [[Teen Girl Squad Issue 7|count to purple backwards]], Cheerleader." --{{User:X-Spider2/X-Sigger2}} 22:07, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
*"WaAaAaAaAaA! T'anks fer comin' Tito, but our potty's in anudder castle!"--Nicktendo 20X6
*"AaAaAaAaAaAaAaA! It's raining malted mothballs!" (Just kinda struck me one day as a rather Homsarish thing to say.) --{{User:Jay/sig}} 18:45, 1 August 2006 (UTC)
*"This is not the hotdog sandwich." --{{User:Theyellowdart/sig}}
*"I'm the newer Kenny Rodgers!"--{{User:Cool Tapes.exe/sig}}
*"I have a nasty aftertaste."--[[User:Scalawag|Scalawag]]

User talk:Has Matt?

2007-01-30T02:17:10Z

Scalawag:

User talk:Has Matt?

2007-01-30T02:13:23Z

Scalawag:

User talk:Has Matt?

2007-01-30T02:12:20Z

Scalawag: