Category talk:To be deleted
From Homestar Runner Wiki
Hobophobic (Talk | contribs) (COMMENT'D!) |
Defender1031 (Talk | contribs) (fixing broken links) |
||
| (includes 9 intermediate revisions) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| + | <div class="plainlinks" style="font-family: georgia; border: 1px dashed #06f; background: #eef; padding: 0.5em; margin: 0.5em 0.5em 1em; text-align: center;">Category:To be deleted doesn't look right?<br /> | ||
| + | <span style="font-size: 18px;">— [http://www.hrwiki.org/index.php?title=Category:To_be_deleted&action=purge Purge the cache] —</span></div> | ||
| + | |||
| + | == Good idea == | ||
| + | |||
This is definitely a good idea, since normal users can't delete stuff. [[User:Hobophobic|<nowiki>~</nowiki>Hobo]] | This is definitely a good idea, since normal users can't delete stuff. [[User:Hobophobic|<nowiki>~</nowiki>Hobo]] | ||
| + | |||
| + | == Template == | ||
| + | |||
| + | In regards to template:tobedeleted being listed as one of the items needing deletion, I can't get around that being listed there. If I don't have the Category: tag in the template, no articles will appear in this category when you add the template to the bottom of the page. --[[User:Gafaddict|Gafaddict]] 20:59, 6 Mar 2005 (MST) | ||
| + | |||
| + | :Yeah, I don't think it can be avoided. The samething happens with [[:Category:Articles needing cleanup]].[[User:Tom|<nowiki></nowiki>]] -- [[User:Tom|Tom]] 21:52, 6 Mar 2005 (MST) | ||
| + | |||
| + | ::Perhaps there should be some kinda note in the main overview though, something that says not to delete it. I mean, it is in the list, and some future overzealous sysop may not realize it's just a technical limitation.... ''<tt>[[Special:Contributions/Thunderbird L17|<font color=gold>⇔</font>]][[User:Thunderbird L17|<font color=gold>Thunderbird</font>]][[User talk:Thunderbird L17|<font color=gold>⇔</font>]]</tt>'' 13:29, 9 May 2005 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | == Erase Page? == | ||
| + | |||
| + | I'm thinking we shouldn't erase the whole page when we add the template. If one wanted to vote to keep it a page, we shouldn't delete all the text that is there. Agree? →[[User:FireBird|''<small><tt>[[User:FireBird|<font color=green>FireBird</font>]]</tt></small>'']] | ||
| + | |||
| + | :Makes sense. I've fixed the wording.[[User:Tom|<nowiki></nowiki>]] -- [[User:Tom|Tom]] 10:29, 19 Mar 2005 (MST) | ||
| + | |||
| + | == Sub-category for speedy delete == | ||
| + | |||
| + | I'm thinking that we should create a sub category for candiates for speedy deletion. That way, it's easier for ops to sort out the pages that need speedy deletion. Approval? {{User:Gafaddict/sig}} 04:07, 24 Aug 2005 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | :Not really, as we rarely have more than five articles here at a time. - {{User:Kookykman/sig}} | ||
Current revision as of 23:33, 2 May 2007
— Purge the cache —
Contents |
[edit] Good idea
This is definitely a good idea, since normal users can't delete stuff. ~Hobo
[edit] Template
In regards to template:tobedeleted being listed as one of the items needing deletion, I can't get around that being listed there. If I don't have the Category: tag in the template, no articles will appear in this category when you add the template to the bottom of the page. --Gafaddict 20:59, 6 Mar 2005 (MST)
- Yeah, I don't think it can be avoided. The samething happens with Category:Articles needing cleanup. -- Tom 21:52, 6 Mar 2005 (MST)
- Perhaps there should be some kinda note in the main overview though, something that says not to delete it. I mean, it is in the list, and some future overzealous sysop may not realize it's just a technical limitation.... ⇔Thunderbird⇔ 13:29, 9 May 2005 (UTC)
[edit] Erase Page?
I'm thinking we shouldn't erase the whole page when we add the template. If one wanted to vote to keep it a page, we shouldn't delete all the text that is there. Agree? →[[User:FireBird|FireBird]]
- Makes sense. I've fixed the wording. -- Tom 10:29, 19 Mar 2005 (MST)
[edit] Sub-category for speedy delete
I'm thinking that we should create a sub category for candiates for speedy deletion. That way, it's easier for ops to sort out the pages that need speedy deletion. Approval? —Gafaddict 
(Talk | Contribs.) 04:07, 24 Aug 2005 (UTC)
