Talk:2010 Calendar

From Homestar Runner Wiki

Revision as of 00:40, 18 December 2010

Can anybody see if the Horrible Painting is on the calendar? Jibblejibblejibble 02:43, 27 December 2009 (UTC)

He's not. cash money ^t_c 21:46, 27 December 2009 (UTC)

Well, guys, it took a whole week and a lot of slacking off (most of the slacking was done by me), but we FINALLY finished this page. Beautiful! The New Uzi-Bazooka 18:21, 28 December 2009 (UTC)

The page is awesome. Can we make it more awesome by getting pictures of each month? Religious Corn   18:36, 1 January 2010 (UTC)

I think that might be pushing the "fair use" policy. —Soiled Bargains ^(talk|ctrb) 18:40, 1 January 2010 (UTC)

Nah, I think getting pictures of each moth is a great idea! everyone can see them so they know if they wanna buy it or not! Jibblejibblejibble 16:20, 2 January 2010 (UTC)

I bought the calendar, and I'm fairly sure it has no pictures of moths. Just kidding, Jibs. But seriously, it'd be a bad idea to picture upcoming months. They're most of the reason people buy the calendar, and if posted, would generate less sales (Meaning less baby-supporting money on the Chaps' part). --HRWiki Greg

PLEEEASE?!?!?!?

Can we put up pictures of each months? I would really like to see them (has puppy dog eyes) PLEEEEAAAASSSSEEEE?????? Jibblejibblejibble 01:26, 8 January 2010 (UTC)

Then buy the calendar. We're not going to post them here, as doing so would deprive TBC of income. — It's dot com 01:54, 8 January 2010 (UTC)

I do see your point, It's dot com. I can't help but wonder, however, why we treat the calendar different from the posters. Shouldn't we follow the same principle for both (i.e. either allow small pictures of both because small is okay, or have both without pictures)? --Cass from Germany 15:12, 8 January 2010 (UTC)

The pictures of the posters (and almost every other product image on the wiki) is taken straight from the site itself. If TBC released the image themselves, there is no reason why we can't use it fairly. — Elcool ^(talk)_(contribs) 15:49, 8 January 2010 (UTC)

I agree with all of you guys who say that we SHOULDN'T. It's just not fair! However, I ALSO see why everyone else WANTS pictures. Elcool made a good point, though: "If TBC released the image themselves, there is no reason why we can't use it fairly." And TBC released a picture of the February Dangeresque page on the RSS Feed. So we can put that up, and everyone will be happy (or, at least, somebody will.) -The New Uzi-Bazooka. 10:20, 8 January 2010 (CST)

In case this wasn't clear: The original poster asked for pictures of all the months. TBC have not, unless I missed something, posted pictures of all twelve months. Yes, we can certainly post any image that TBC have themselves released, but not others, which some people here are asking for. Heimstern Läufer 16:23, 8 January 2010 (UTC)

I know that we can't realease all the pictures, I was just suggesting we release the picture of the February page ONLY, because we already HAVE released it (see below, I got this from the main page of the wiki.) I'm not suggesting we put any other pages up, just that one. -The New Uzi-Bazooka. 10:47, 8 January 2010 (CST)

.

Can we release pictures of the calendar at the end of the year, since it will probably be unavailable by then? RickTommy 21:00, 30 January 2010 (UTC)

Well, i took the advice you gave to me, It's Dot Com, and bought the calander. There is ALOT of funny stuff awaiting for you guys. I encourage you to BUY THE FREAKIN' CALENDAR! Jibblejibblejibble 20:02, 9 February 2010 (UTC)

Well, RickTommy, I agree. we should release the moth pictures next year when the calendar is unusable. It CAN be usable next year though. you can take each month and cross out the number on a month, then put it on the NEXT day, then cross out the NEXT day's number then put it on the day after that, so it would be putting the 1st on the 2nd and the 2nd on the 3rd. easy! so it can be usable for another year, Its called recycling. The Green Cheat would help you recycle it! Jibblejibblejibble 15:38, 10 February 2010 (UTC)

Well, technically, the January page is unusable, so should we release the pictures monthly? SBE-mail Checker Dan 01:37, 11 February 2010 (UTC)

A concur from me. Jibblejibblejibble 17:00, 18 February 2010 (UTC)

Besides, if we aren't allowed to post the pictures from the calander, what makes you guys think we can show toons removed from the site for "personal reasons?" By that I mean MLS, Jumping Jack Contest, and If I Ran the Camera. SBE-mail Checker Dan 02:09, 10 April 2010 (UTC)

This is a totally different thing. TBC never charged you anything to see those toons. They were free. A good comparison would be if we put links to view the bonus features from the DVDs. That would be stealing, because the only way to view them is to buy merchandise from TBC, and mirroring the toons will make them loose money. Same with the calendar. — Elcool ^(talk)_(contribs) 05:49, 10 April 2010 (UTC)

Another reason they should be up is because some people, like myself, aren't allowed to buy stuff online, so we can at least get a partial experience. RickTommy (edits) 07:05, 10 April 2010 (UTC)

You are getting a partial experience: the things already described on the page. --DorianGray 07:09, 10 April 2010 (UTC)

Reviving this discussion: I see that the calendar has been discontinued. I guess that means it's now safe to upload the pictures? RickTommy (edits) 00:29, 18 December 2010 (UTC)

You bring up a valid point, but it would push the limits of, if not violate, fair use to upload all of them, no matter how good or bad the scans. I think it would be best to wait another year or two to even upload a couple, as I feel that now is too soon. —Soiled Bargains ^(talk|ctrb) 00:40, 18 December 2010 (UTC)

Goof

Homsar's '02 and '03 costumes are switched; It lists Slash before Ghost Dog. Is this already listed, or should we bother? --FIFTH GREG! HRWiki Greg 22:08, 7 February 2010 (UTC)

I think it's notable and should be pointed out. Not sure where, but the October section seems like the best place. wbwolf (t | ed) 22:30, 7 February 2010 (UTC)