Talk:2010 Calendar
From Homestar Runner Wiki
HRWiki Greg (Talk | contribs) (→Goof) |
HRWiki Greg (Talk | contribs) (→Goof) |
||
| Line 22: | Line 22: | ||
== Goof == | == Goof == | ||
| - | Homsar's '02 and '03 costumes are switched; It lists Slash before Ghost Dog. Is this already listed, or should we bother?--[[User:HRWiki Greg|FIFTH GREG! HRWiki Greg]] 22:08, 7 February 2010 (UTC) | + | Homsar's '02 and '03 costumes are switched; It lists Slash before Ghost Dog. Is this already listed, or should we bother? --[[User:HRWiki Greg|FIFTH GREG! HRWiki Greg]] 22:08, 7 February 2010 (UTC) |
Revision as of 22:09, 7 February 2010
Can anybody see if the Horrible Painting is on the calendar? Jibblejibblejibble 02:43, 27 December 2009 (UTC)
- He's not. cash money tc 21:46, 27 December 2009 (UTC)
Well, guys, it took a whole week and a lot of slacking off (most of the slacking was done by me), but we FINALLY finished this page. Beautiful! The New Uzi-Bazooka 18:21, 28 December 2009 (UTC)
The page is awesome. Can we make it more awesome by getting pictures of each month? Religious Corn 
18:36, 1 January 2010 (UTC)
- I think that might be pushing the "fair use" policy. —Soiled Bargains (talk|ctrb) 18:40, 1 January 2010 (UTC)
- Nah, I think getting pictures of each moth is a great idea! everyone can see them so they know if they wanna buy it or not! Jibblejibblejibble 16:20, 2 January 2010 (UTC)
PLEEEASE?!?!?!?
Can we put up pictures of each months? I would really like to see them (has puppy dog eyes) PLEEEEAAAASSSSEEEE?????? Jibblejibblejibble 01:26, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
- Then buy the calendar. We're not going to post them here, as doing so would deprive TBC of income. — It's dot com 01:54, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
- I do see your point, It's dot com. I can't help but wonder, however, why we treat the calendar different from the posters. Shouldn't we follow the same principle for both (i.e. either allow small pictures of both because small is okay, or have both without pictures)? --Cass from Germany 15:12, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
- The pictures of the posters (and almost every other product image on the wiki) is taken straight from the site itself. If TBC released the image themselves, there is no reason why we can't use it fairly. — Elcool (talk)(contribs) 15:49, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
- I agree with all of you guys who say that we SHOULDN'T. It's just not fair! However, I ALSO see why everyone else WANTS pictures. Elcool made a good point, though: "If TBC released the image themselves, there is no reason why we can't use it fairly." And TBC released a picture of the February Dangeresque page on the RSS Feed. So we can put that up, and everyone will be happy (or, at least, somebody will.) -The New Uzi-Bazooka. 10:20, 8 January 2010 (CST)
- In case this wasn't clear: The original poster asked for pictures of all the months. TBC have not, unless I missed something, posted pictures of all twelve months. Yes, we can certainly post any image that TBC have themselves released, but not others, which some people here are asking for. Heimstern Läufer
16:23, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
- I know that we can't realease all the pictures, I was just suggesting we release the picture of the February page ONLY, because we already HAVE released it (see below, I got this from the main page of the wiki.) I'm not suggesting we put any other pages up, just that one. -The New Uzi-Bazooka. 10:47, 8 January 2010 (CST)
- In case this wasn't clear: The original poster asked for pictures of all the months. TBC have not, unless I missed something, posted pictures of all twelve months. Yes, we can certainly post any image that TBC have themselves released, but not others, which some people here are asking for. Heimstern Läufer
- I agree with all of you guys who say that we SHOULDN'T. It's just not fair! However, I ALSO see why everyone else WANTS pictures. Elcool made a good point, though: "If TBC released the image themselves, there is no reason why we can't use it fairly." And TBC released a picture of the February Dangeresque page on the RSS Feed. So we can put that up, and everyone will be happy (or, at least, somebody will.) -The New Uzi-Bazooka. 10:20, 8 January 2010 (CST)
- The pictures of the posters (and almost every other product image on the wiki) is taken straight from the site itself. If TBC released the image themselves, there is no reason why we can't use it fairly. — Elcool (talk)(contribs) 15:49, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
- I do see your point, It's dot com. I can't help but wonder, however, why we treat the calendar different from the posters. Shouldn't we follow the same principle for both (i.e. either allow small pictures of both because small is okay, or have both without pictures)? --Cass from Germany 15:12, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
.
- Can we release pictures of the calendar at the end of the year, since it will probably be unavailable by then? RickTommy 21:00, 30 January 2010 (UTC)
Goof
Homsar's '02 and '03 costumes are switched; It lists Slash before Ghost Dog. Is this already listed, or should we bother? --FIFTH GREG! HRWiki Greg 22:08, 7 February 2010 (UTC)
