Current revision |
Your text |
Line 1: |
Line 1: |
- | {{deletedtalk}}
| |
- | ==Deletion Discussion '05==
| |
| I'm questioning the need of putting this under Strong Bad's "Also Known As" list, and crediting him as "Buckethand" in [[new hands]]. He never referred to himself as "Buckethand" in new hands; it was simply a nickname Homestar gave him in an easter egg. --[[User:Gafaddict|Gafaddict]] 02:32, 5 May 2005 (UTC) | | I'm questioning the need of putting this under Strong Bad's "Also Known As" list, and crediting him as "Buckethand" in [[new hands]]. He never referred to himself as "Buckethand" in new hands; it was simply a nickname Homestar gave him in an easter egg. --[[User:Gafaddict|Gafaddict]] 02:32, 5 May 2005 (UTC) |
| | | |
Line 38: |
Line 36: |
| | | |
| Oh come on! Almsot all of the names under there were only used once, so why not delete them, too? This is crazy. | | Oh come on! Almsot all of the names under there were only used once, so why not delete them, too? This is crazy. |
- |
| |
- | Oh, sorry, that last one was from [[Ju Ju Master]]
| |
- |
| |
- | I agree with Homfrog!
| |
- |
| |
- | Me twoo --[[User:Technochocolate|Technochocolate]] 22:46, 7 Jun 2005 (UTC)
| |
- |
| |
- | Buckethand isn't a character! It's just Strong Bad with different hands! Delete this crap!
| |
- |
| |
- | Oh and that last one was from me, [[User:Darklinkskywalker|Darklinkskywalker]]
| |
- |
| |
- | # This isn't crap!
| |
- | # This ''is'' a character!
| |
- | # He's to awexsome to be deleted!
| |
- | # --[[User:Technochocolate|Technochocolate]] 05:19, 10 Jun 2005 (UTC)
| |
- |
| |
- | Everything on this page either could be or already is on another page. If "Mustachioed Homestar Runner" is not a character, then this ''certainly'' isn't. — [[User:It's dot com|It's dot com]] 01:59, 12 Jun 2005 (UTC)
| |
- |
| |
- | I say the fact that he was refered to on the site as "buckethand" and has his own figurine makes this a worthy character page.
| |
- |
| |
- | :I concur. We (and I don't) may not consider buckethand a "character" per se, but if TBC thought it was good enough to make a figurine as well as refer to it by name, it should stay put. -- [[User:Tony Stony|Tony Stony]] 02:36, 14 Jun 2005 (UTC)
| |
- |
| |
- | ::Second. Figurine = Important. No contest. —[[User:Shawn81|Shawn81]] 07:32, 21 Jun 2005 (UTC)
| |
- | ::: Not so sure. "Running Homestar" is a figurine but we don't have a page for him (separate from regular Homestar.) --{{User:Jay/sig}} 07:37, 21 Jun 2005 (UTC)
| |
- | :::: Do you want me to make it for you? --[[User:Technochocolate|Technochocolate]] 11:15, 22 Jun 2005 (UTC)
| |
- |
| |
- | ahh, I say delete it. It's EXTREMELY unimportant to homestarrunner.com, and I don't think it should be important here, either.
| |
- | -[[Tapd260]]
| |
- |
| |
- | Don't Delete. That's what I say.
| |
- | If we delete this, then it only be fair to delete
| |
- | Striped Green Rabbit: He's only in one cartoon.
| |
- | Mrs. Commanderson: She's got even less time then Buckethand.
| |
- | Plus, neither of them have their own figures! -[[Tailz120]]
| |
- |
| |
- | dont delete me if you do i will return and delete you.
| |
- |
| |
- | Despite Buckethand's relative unpopularity, he appeared as a figurine. People will want to know about the people in the figurines. This appears twice on the site, and was a basis for a Strong Bad email. '''Keep'''. {{User:Rogue Leader.sig}} 16:30, 16 Aug 2005 (UTC)
| |
- |
| |
- | == Deletion Discussion '07 ==
| |
- | Isn't this all covered already in the email? '''Delete''' {{User:DeFender1031/sig}} 18:08, 15 September 2007 (UTC)
| |
- | :i think it should be a seperate article.
| |
- | ::You haven't given a reason why it should be. {{User:DeFender1031/sig}} 18:10, 15 September 2007 (UTC)
| |
- | :::Just because it was shown in the article, it was only shown in the transcript. This is an actual article gthering the info. Also, it was a requested page and it doesnt go that much into the buckethand in the new hands page. [[User:Foop|[[Image:butterda.png]]DJ F00P]] 18:33, 15 September 2007 (UTC)
| |
- | ::::No No No. A page about the new hands Strong Bad imagines may, I think, could be a good idea. Including fingered hands and such. But this by itself? I don't think it merits an article.--[[User:CoachG|CoachG]] 18:36, 15 September 2007 (UTC)
| |
- | :::::Because it was a one-time gag. Also, there are no requested pages on HRWiki. You are probably referring to [[Special:Wantedpages]] which just means that such a page is linked to. Check this page, you'll see that it's only linked to from talk pages, and now that i look, it seems that this page once existed and was deleted. Therefore, I'm changing the tag on this to a speedy deletion. {{User:DeFender1031/sig}} 18:37, 15 September 2007 (UTC)
| |
- | ::::ok. if i new it was deleted before i wouldnt have made it.
| |