Talk:Buckethand

From Homestar Runner Wiki

(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
m
Line 55: Line 55:
I say the fact that he was refered to on the site as "buckethand"  and has his own figurine makes this a worthy character page.
I say the fact that he was refered to on the site as "buckethand"  and has his own figurine makes this a worthy character page.
 +
 +
:I concur.  We (and I don't) may not consider buckethand a "character" per se, but if TBC thought it was good enough to make a figurine as well as refer to it by name, it should stay put. -- [[User:Tony Stony|Tony Stony]] 02:36, 14 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Revision as of 02:36, 14 June 2005

I'm questioning the need of putting this under Strong Bad's "Also Known As" list, and crediting him as "Buckethand" in new hands. He never referred to himself as "Buckethand" in new hands; it was simply a nickname Homestar gave him in an easter egg. --Gafaddict 02:32, 5 May 2005 (UTC)

Agreed. This is a nickname and no more. Delete? Mayhaps? - Dr Haggis - Talk 04:45, 5 May 2005 (UTC)

I'd add to nicknames and redirct there. Except one thing bothers me. It surprised me that buckethand Strong Bad was a Collectible Figurine. Why would The Brothers Chaps make him into a figurine? -- Tom 15:56, 5 May 2005 (UTC)

Maybe he was a popular character? - Me

He's only appeared once. That's not too popular. I'd rather have a Trogdor than a Buckethand Strong Bad. But, of course, I don't even own Set 2. →FireBird
When set 2 was first announced, I said that the best characters to round it out would be duplicates of Homestar and Strong Bad - just not the duplicates they ended up creating (I'd have gone with The Homestar Runner and Stinkoman myself.) --Jay (Talk) 22:36, 10 May 2005 (UTC)

If you don't like this, then see the other pages I made: Typing Tutor Turbo, Viklas, and Peanut Strong Bad. They're good, too. - T.C.

Wait...I got it...you don't like this page!!! I'm Sorry, but most of the BETTER pages were taken...that and I can't find a good picture of the Cloitsterizer. Why didn't you tell me sooner!?! - T.C. Sooooooo...you guys have any good pictures of the cloitsterizer?

Technochocolate, not to be rude, but don't go creating random pages just to try to get popular. More than likely, if you create more pages, people will get annoyed. →FireBird
So does that mean you'll keep this? - T.C.

I hope! --VolatileChemical, too lazy to log in

I'm leaning towards deleting this, T.C., unless someone gives me a good reason not to (other than 'I created this page! PLS PLS PLS!!!'). It's just a nickname, not a character. →FireBird


NO WAY!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Donot delteted. He's a figureine, he's his own page.-Homfrog 00:34, 22 May 2005 (UTC)

I say keep because he has a figurine. No other reason. Wouldn't miss it, though. -- Joshua 01:41, 22 May 2005 (UTC)

I Disagree

Buckethand has his own toy and he even appearead!and was mentioned

Oh come on! Almsot all of the names under there were only used once, so why not delete them, too? This is crazy.

Oh, sorry, that last one was from Ju Ju Master

I agree with Homfrog!

Me twoo --Technochocolate 22:46, 7 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Buckethand isn't a character! It's just Strong Bad with different hands! Delete this crap!

Oh and that last one was from me, Darklinkskywalker

  1. This isn't crap!
  2. This is a character!
  3. He's to awexsome to be deleted!
  4. --Technochocolate 05:19, 10 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Everything on this page either could be or already is on another page. If "Mustachioed Homestar Runner" is not a character, then this certainly isn't. — It's dot com 01:59, 12 Jun 2005 (UTC)

I say the fact that he was refered to on the site as "buckethand" and has his own figurine makes this a worthy character page.

I concur. We (and I don't) may not consider buckethand a "character" per se, but if TBC thought it was good enough to make a figurine as well as refer to it by name, it should stay put. -- Tony Stony 02:36, 14 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Personal tools