Talk:Cheat Commandos: Two Part Episode: Part 1
From Homestar Runner Wiki
Contents |
Doppel or Toppel
The transcript uses the actual word doppelganger, while the inside reference is to the Toppelgangers. Is the transcript wromg? -173.3.112.55 13:50, 1 June 2009 (UTC)
- I thought it sounded like "toppleganger" when I was transcribing it, but I'd forgotten about The Topplegangers, so I figured I was just mishearing. But I wasn't, Toppleganger is right, and I've already fixed the transcript as soon as I saw the inside ref. --phlip TC 13:57, 1 June 2009 (UTC)
Get back to work, guys.
I think Reynolds brother says "Get back to work, Charles." and don't we already know that Charles is Gunhaver's first name from let us give tanks? Javaguy78 14:06, 1 June 2009 (UTC)
- I've listened to it several times, and I believe this is true. I'm gonna change it. It also makes makes sense since Crackotage and Silent Rip are actually working Javaguy78 14:10, 1 June 2009 (UTC)
Does this mean...
...that next week there is gonna be another Cheat Commando's? User:MICGAGUH
- Given the last time we had a two-part toon? Might be tomorrow. --Jay (Talk) 19:41, 1 June 2009 (UTC)
white screen
A decompiler, a Flash Seek Bookmarklet, or the Greasemonkey script reveals a white screen before the TV Easter egg can be accessed.
I removed this from the Easter Eggs section, because that's certainly not the right place for it. I considered placing it elsewhere on the page, but decided not to because it doesn't seem that notable. The HRWiki:Standards as I interpret them, seems we don't mention such things unless they are clearly meant to be discovered and/or add something relevant to the cartoon (E.g. "Nice try, dodongo" and —by Strong Bab). Just thought I'd mention my rationale here, if others feel that it really deserves a mention in the article, I don't have a strong opinion against that. Green Helmet 19:56, 1 June 2009 (UTC)
- Definitely notable, but seemingly unintentional. Seems like a goof or a remark to me. ⇔Thunderbird⇔ 21:21, 1 June 2009 (UTC)
- Things like this have been remarked before, such as the dancing feet or the extra frames in Not the Hundredth E-mail.
-MNGoldenEagle 21:34, 1 June 2009 (UTC)