Talk:False references

From Homestar Runner Wiki

(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
(Not Ready for Primetime)
Line 13: Line 13:
:::While the scope is better-defined than the old page, I'm still not convinced this is anything worth documenting. I won't delete it just yet - I'll allow others to weigh in - but I'm in favor of '''stupid wording''' it. --{{User:Jay/sig}} 07:14, 15 June 2020 (UTC)
:::While the scope is better-defined than the old page, I'm still not convinced this is anything worth documenting. I won't delete it just yet - I'll allow others to weigh in - but I'm in favor of '''stupid wording''' it. --{{User:Jay/sig}} 07:14, 15 June 2020 (UTC)
DELETE IT! - Strong Bad
DELETE IT! - Strong Bad
 +
::::Going once... --{{User:Jay/sig}} 21:10, 22 June 2020 (UTC)

Revision as of 21:10, 22 June 2020

DELETED!
This is the talk page of a deleted article. Please do not participate in the discussions archived here. If you can provide a reason for the existence of this page that hasn't been discussed below, you may start a new section. Please refer to the inclusion guidelines that are generally applied to judge an article's merit.

Not a trend

This is, as it currently stands, four random non-sequiturs with not much else in common, and one situation where the author simply expected a gag that didn't happen. I don't see any sort of trend here. I say DEL MONTE it. --Jay (Talk) 00:11, 15 April 2019 (UTC)

I agree. Baleet. Gfdgsgxgzgdrc 00:17, 15 April 2019 (UTC)
Agree Del Taco.-174.62.238.201 01:31, 15 April 2019 (UTC)
I'm extremely unclear on what this page is supposed to be, and the lede doesn't help at all with clearing it up. Delteate. DEI DAT VMdatvm center\super contra 11:00, 15 April 2019 (UTC)
I was thinking it was them joking to make us go look up stuff to see if they were referring to anything, maybe even playing at the Wiki itself. StarFox 02:48, 16 April 2019 (UTC)

Not Ready for Primetime

I know this article was deleted, but since it's recently seen some activity, maybe whomever wants it to become an article should Sandbox it and get some consensus on board before working on it in the mainspace again. -- 68.37.43.131 19:27, 14 June 2020 (UTC)

I stand by my just-over-a-year-ago self. We'll never know the intentions behind these jokes, so calling them "false references" is speculation. This page should be baleeted again unless there is consensus to rewrite the page in a more objective, encyclopedic manner. Gfdgsgxgzgdrc 21:23, 14 June 2020 (UTC)
I don’t think the page has any new merit over the first time. Speedy del taco again -166.137.12.117 22:39, 14 June 2020 (UTC)
While the scope is better-defined than the old page, I'm still not convinced this is anything worth documenting. I won't delete it just yet - I'll allow others to weigh in - but I'm in favor of stupid wording it. --Jay (Talk) 07:14, 15 June 2020 (UTC)

DELETE IT! - Strong Bad

Going once... --Jay (Talk) 21:10, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
Personal tools