Talk:Lurker
From Homestar Runner Wiki
(Difference between revisions)
(→Merge: reply) |
(adding redirect) |
||
(includes 4 intermediate revisions) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
+ | {{deletedtalk|redirect=Strong Sad}} | ||
+ | |||
== Merge == | == Merge == | ||
Line 8: | Line 10: | ||
:::Agree. '''Merge'''. {{User:Qermaq/sig}} 20:37, 30 December 2006 (UTC) | :::Agree. '''Merge'''. {{User:Qermaq/sig}} 20:37, 30 December 2006 (UTC) | ||
::::Unless anyone has any immediate objections, perhaps we should merge it right now. — {{User:Lapper/sig}} 03:39, 4 January 2007 (UTC) | ::::Unless anyone has any immediate objections, perhaps we should merge it right now. — {{User:Lapper/sig}} 03:39, 4 January 2007 (UTC) | ||
+ | :::::Looks likes solid consensus to me — I'm going to go ahead and merge it. {{User:Trey56/sig}} 18:34, 6 January 2007 (UTC) |
Current revision as of 16:01, 19 June 2009
[edit] Merge
This should be merged with Strong Sad since nobody else is called a lurker. I also don't think it's significant enough to warrant it's own article. Loafing 06:05, 12 September 2006 (UTC)
- All right, then. Go ahead. Retromaniac 16:33, 12 September 2006 (UTC)
- Even though thia topic's been dormant, I agree with merging the article with Strong Sad. I feel the information deserves to be a part of the wiki, but doesn't deserve its own page. Bluebry 20:36, 30 December 2006 (UTC)