Talk:Names ending in -bert

From Homestar Runner Wiki

Revision as of 00:13, 14 August 2009 by Espemon333 (Talk | contribs)
Jump to: navigation, search

It has been suggested that the content of the page this talk page accompanies should not be a separate article on the wiki.

  • Please discuss below whether the content of the page should have its own article. Remember to consider ways the content could be brought up to the wiki's standards before making this determination.

If it is decided that the content should not have its own article, then the following additional issues need to be addressed:

  • Whether to merge the content with another page or remove it entirely.
  • Whether to redirect the leftover page or delete it outright.
 


Should it stay or should it go?

I'm rather doubtful of the use of this page, since we have two instances of -bert. It would seem like, at least for now, it be better to merge this Names ending in -face, since its a similar gag. wbwolf (t | ed) 22:42, 9 May 2009 (UTC)

You could say the same for Names Ending in -erson, but we won't merge that. I say delete. Thy Not Dennis (t/c) 23:59, 9 May 2009 (UTC)
merge Names ending in -face, Names Ending in -erson, and Names ending in -bert into strange name prefixes/suffixes
No merge, those other "names ending in" gags are strong enough to stand alone. This, as it is, does not. I don't know of any way to search for a partial word to know what other instances there are of names ending in -bert, but I can see there might be a few. It's possible. If no one can come up with more than the two that are currently in the article (and soon), delete until we have more. OptimisticFool 00:28, 10 May 2009 (UTC)
What Opti just said is what I was trying to say, just phrased better. Delete. Thy Not Dennis (t/c) 18:04, 10 May 2009 (UTC)
Well, i have a couple more... there's "Crambert" from replacement, and "Terbert" from coloring... Given these that i pulled off the top of my head, i find it difficult to believe that there aren't even more of them floating around... I say that if we can find at least one or two more, we should keep it. — Defender1031*Talk 18:21, 10 May 2009 (UTC)
Is four examples enough? If so, keep. – The Chort 19:58, 20 May 2009 (UTC)
I added a fifth, though its actually a IRL example. -132.183.140.244 16:26, 4 June 2009 (UTC)
Four is enough for me. It's a keeper. OptimisticFool 04:57, 9 June 2009 (UTC)
That's a keeper. Keep--Jellote wuz here 16:47, 25 June 2009 (UTC)
I REALLY REALLY REALLY like the third guy's idea! MERGE THEM ALL!!!!! Espemon333 8:34 PM, July 16, 2009 (UTC)
Given that you were the third guy, your opinion has already been noted. — Defender1031*Talk 01:38, 17 July 2009 (UTC)
Espe's done this before. My opinion: keep. free 01:53, 17 July 2009 (UTC)

I am not gonna bother arguing with you DeFender1031. Theycallmefree, that was for a personal reason! And not because I hate the one who posted it. End of story. -Espe

That's kind of an imature way to make it seem like we all want to merge. While that doesn't break any rules, it is kind of annoying. I can't punish you or anything, but please please don't do that. It confuses peoples. I stand by my keep, regardless. Don't count that twice, though...--Jellote wuz here 13:18, 17 July 2009 (UTC)
Jellote, actually it IS against the rules to have multiple accounts, or try to trick others into thinking multiple posts of yours are multiple people. Espemon, it doesn't really matter what your "personal reasons" are, rule-breaking is rule-breaking. Please keep whatever "personal reasons" you have to yourself in cases where they would prompt you to violate the wiki rules. Thanks. — Defender1031*Talk 18:12, 17 July 2009 (UTC)

Ok, thanks for being polite about it. If you must know I posted that on a computer where i was not logged in. I didn't want the I.P. open on the internet. -Espemon333 I WAS NOT THE THIRD GUY!!! -You Know Who

Since No one but me has posted recentally, i took off the

It has been suggested that the content of the page this talk page accompanies should not be a separate article on the wiki.

  • Please discuss below whether the content of the page should have its own article. Remember to consider ways the content could be brought up to the wiki's standards before making this determination.

If it is decided that the content should not have its own article, then the following additional issues need to be addressed:

  • Whether to merge the content with another page or remove it entirely.
  • Whether to redirect the leftover page or delete it outright.
 
Retrieved from "http://hrwiki.org/wiki/Talk:Names_ending_in_-bert"
Personal tools