Editing Talk:Neologisms
From Homestar Runner Wiki
Warning: You are not logged in.
Your IP address will be recorded in this page's edit history.
Current revision | Your text | ||
Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
:::I'm not trying to be insulting, it's just my opinion. Good point though on keeping it... but I still lean towards deletion. --{{User:Theyellowdart/sig}} | :::I'm not trying to be insulting, it's just my opinion. Good point though on keeping it... but I still lean towards deletion. --{{User:Theyellowdart/sig}} | ||
::::This article has definite potential, and it's already up to four entries. Keep it. — [[User:It's dot com|It's dot com]] 18:45, 29 December 2006 (UTC) | ::::This article has definite potential, and it's already up to four entries. Keep it. — [[User:It's dot com|It's dot com]] 18:45, 29 December 2006 (UTC) | ||
- | :::::This article merits as being a real article, because of it's many examples. It has a good description as well. I say keep.--[[User: | + | :::::This article merits as being a real article, because of it's many examples. It has a good description as well. I say keep.--[[User:Giskard|Giskard]] 18:47, 29 December 2006 (UTC) |
::::::Potential, possibly, but do we have to list every made up word, some of them products? It seems to me that those exist [[Glossary|here]] (Or [[Items|here]], in the products case). {{User:Bluebry/sig}} 18:48, 29 December 2006 (UTC) | ::::::Potential, possibly, but do we have to list every made up word, some of them products? It seems to me that those exist [[Glossary|here]] (Or [[Items|here]], in the products case). {{User:Bluebry/sig}} 18:48, 29 December 2006 (UTC) | ||
:::::::To answer your question, yes, we should list every made-up word. That's the point of the article. It doesn't matter that these items are on other, different pages. Not all of the things in the glossary are made up, and neither are most of the items. What makes these words interesting is that they're not even ''close'' to actual English words, unlike the portmanteaus and things like "arrow'd". — [[User:It's dot com|It's dot com]] 18:56, 29 December 2006 (UTC) | :::::::To answer your question, yes, we should list every made-up word. That's the point of the article. It doesn't matter that these items are on other, different pages. Not all of the things in the glossary are made up, and neither are most of the items. What makes these words interesting is that they're not even ''close'' to actual English words, unlike the portmanteaus and things like "arrow'd". — [[User:It's dot com|It's dot com]] 18:56, 29 December 2006 (UTC) | ||
Line 31: | Line 31: | ||
::Oh, reading the above comments I see I'm not the only one who has thought of this... {{User:Trey56/sig}} 01:54, 9 January 2007 (UTC) | ::Oh, reading the above comments I see I'm not the only one who has thought of this... {{User:Trey56/sig}} 01:54, 9 January 2007 (UTC) | ||
- | |||
- | |||
- | |||
- | |||
- | |||
- | |||
- | |||
- | |||
- | |||
- | |||
- | |||
- |