Talk:Other Little Girl
From Homestar Runner Wiki
(Difference between revisions)
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
:::Actually, "no" in my book. Stubs are for articles which clearly have the potential to be longer. There isn't much more to know or say about her. (I mean, we could fluff it up with some prose, but that's not so desirable anyway.) I'll let folks talk about it a little; if there's no objection I'll take the tag off. —[[User:AbdiViklas|AbdiViklas]] 03:13, 29 November 2005 (UTC) | :::Actually, "no" in my book. Stubs are for articles which clearly have the potential to be longer. There isn't much more to know or say about her. (I mean, we could fluff it up with some prose, but that's not so desirable anyway.) I'll let folks talk about it a little; if there's no objection I'll take the tag off. —[[User:AbdiViklas|AbdiViklas]] 03:13, 29 November 2005 (UTC) | ||
::::I know that we cannot find more information, but most every article in the stubs section is like that. For example, the article on [[Ryan Bradley]] is lacking a lot of information that we cannot find but is still a stub. In other words, this article can still use work.---[[User:Martin925|Martin925]] | ::::I know that we cannot find more information, but most every article in the stubs section is like that. For example, the article on [[Ryan Bradley]] is lacking a lot of information that we cannot find but is still a stub. In other words, this article can still use work.---[[User:Martin925|Martin925]] | ||
| + | :::::She looks like a Palmer to me. The resemblance and voice are uncanny. | ||
| + | |||
How's abouts we's combine 'dis article here with the original [[Little Girl]] entry? | How's abouts we's combine 'dis article here with the original [[Little Girl]] entry? | ||
Revision as of 02:32, 3 January 2006
Possibility
Is this girl also a member of the Chapman family? -- The Real Zajac 15:50, 28 Nov 2005 (PST)
- Probably, but nothing's verified yet. - Joshua 23:54, 28 November 2005 (UTC)
- Then it should be catorgorized as a stub no?--Martin925 02:21, 29 November 2005 (UTC)
- Actually, "no" in my book. Stubs are for articles which clearly have the potential to be longer. There isn't much more to know or say about her. (I mean, we could fluff it up with some prose, but that's not so desirable anyway.) I'll let folks talk about it a little; if there's no objection I'll take the tag off. —AbdiViklas 03:13, 29 November 2005 (UTC)
- I know that we cannot find more information, but most every article in the stubs section is like that. For example, the article on Ryan Bradley is lacking a lot of information that we cannot find but is still a stub. In other words, this article can still use work.---Martin925
- She looks like a Palmer to me. The resemblance and voice are uncanny.
- I know that we cannot find more information, but most every article in the stubs section is like that. For example, the article on Ryan Bradley is lacking a lot of information that we cannot find but is still a stub. In other words, this article can still use work.---Martin925
- Actually, "no" in my book. Stubs are for articles which clearly have the potential to be longer. There isn't much more to know or say about her. (I mean, we could fluff it up with some prose, but that's not so desirable anyway.) I'll let folks talk about it a little; if there's no objection I'll take the tag off. —AbdiViklas 03:13, 29 November 2005 (UTC)
- Then it should be catorgorized as a stub no?--Martin925 02:21, 29 November 2005 (UTC)
How's abouts we's combine 'dis article here with the original Little Girl entry?
-RadSkat3 23:26, 2 December 2005 (UTC)
Yeah! That'd be great!!!--
Benol, aka Coach B 01:00, 3 December 2005 (UTC)
