Talk:Pseudocharacters
From Homestar Runner Wiki
(Difference between revisions)
Defender1031 (Talk | contribs) (→Inclusion) |
|||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
Okay, I'm not necessarily suggesting that this info should be deleted, but the focus of this article is too narrow and is a rehash of things we already have. The items currently on the page are not more important than the other [[:Category:Pseudocharacters|pseudocharacters]] save for the fact that we have seen them more often. I suggest we either move this page and expand it into a whole [[Pseudocharacters]] article or delete it and let the above category and respective articles speak for themselves. — [[User:It's dot com|It's dot com]] 04:24, 24 May 2007 (UTC) | Okay, I'm not necessarily suggesting that this info should be deleted, but the focus of this article is too narrow and is a rehash of things we already have. The items currently on the page are not more important than the other [[:Category:Pseudocharacters|pseudocharacters]] save for the fact that we have seen them more often. I suggest we either move this page and expand it into a whole [[Pseudocharacters]] article or delete it and let the above category and respective articles speak for themselves. — [[User:It's dot com|It's dot com]] 04:24, 24 May 2007 (UTC) | ||
:I agree. I think it should be '''expanded and moved''' to [[Personification of Inanimate Objects]]. {{User:DeFender1031/sig}} 10:27, 24 May 2007 (UTC) | :I agree. I think it should be '''expanded and moved''' to [[Personification of Inanimate Objects]]. {{User:DeFender1031/sig}} 10:27, 24 May 2007 (UTC) | ||
| + | ::The expansion part is given; observe the {{[[Template:stub|stub]]}} template at the bottom of the page. [[Personification of Inanimate Objects]] is a good title to move. And, on the topic of potential deletion, I disagree. This information is certainly valuable: it's inarguably a prevalent part of the website, as you can see based on the amount of facts that have been compiled already. The title of Pseudocharacters doesn't exactly create the correct focus for the article, as the point is that these inanimate objects are treated like and act like people, as opposed to just being characters. '''Move to Personification of Inanimate Objects'''.{{User:Ten Ten/sig}} 13:13, 24 May 2007 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 13:13, 24 May 2007
What to include?
Currently, the page is only about Strong Bad's relation to technology. Should we also include Frank Bennedetto? Loafing
21:56, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
Inclusion
Okay, I'm not necessarily suggesting that this info should be deleted, but the focus of this article is too narrow and is a rehash of things we already have. The items currently on the page are not more important than the other pseudocharacters save for the fact that we have seen them more often. I suggest we either move this page and expand it into a whole Pseudocharacters article or delete it and let the above category and respective articles speak for themselves. — It's dot com 04:24, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
- I agree. I think it should be expanded and moved to Personification of Inanimate Objects. — Defender1031*Talk 10:27, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
- The expansion part is given; observe the {{stub}} template at the bottom of the page. Personification of Inanimate Objects is a good title to move. And, on the topic of potential deletion, I disagree. This information is certainly valuable: it's inarguably a prevalent part of the website, as you can see based on the amount of facts that have been compiled already. The title of Pseudocharacters doesn't exactly create the correct focus for the article, as the point is that these inanimate objects are treated like and act like people, as opposed to just being characters. Move to Personification of Inanimate Objects.· · T2|Things 13:13, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
