Talk:Strong Bad's Computers Surpassing Their Assumed Capabilities

From Homestar Runner Wiki

(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
(So this may need a rename)
Line 2: Line 2:
The "speculations" thing is a reference to [[animal]] and I’d like to keep it if possible, though it is a bit awkward the way it appears now. Any suggestions? {{User:DeFender1031/sig}} 13:31, 9 February 2012 (UTC)
The "speculations" thing is a reference to [[animal]] and I’d like to keep it if possible, though it is a bit awkward the way it appears now. Any suggestions? {{User:DeFender1031/sig}} 13:31, 9 February 2012 (UTC)
: I don't think we should be putting silly references to sbemails in our article names. This is especially true given that this article does not mention the email that the reference comes from ''at all''. It would be confusing to new readers, and doesn't look terribly professional. Sure, this is a Wiki about a cartoon full of dumb animal characters, but sometimes we need to draw the line at the silliness. So '''specifications''' all the way. --{{User:Jay/sig}} 18:13, 9 February 2012 (UTC)
: I don't think we should be putting silly references to sbemails in our article names. This is especially true given that this article does not mention the email that the reference comes from ''at all''. It would be confusing to new readers, and doesn't look terribly professional. Sure, this is a Wiki about a cartoon full of dumb animal characters, but sometimes we need to draw the line at the silliness. So '''specifications''' all the way. --{{User:Jay/sig}} 18:13, 9 February 2012 (UTC)
 +
::I agree with Jay.  We know where the reference comes from, but I don't think references make good page titles. -[[Special:Contributions/132.183.4.6|132.183.4.6]] 19:34, 9 February 2012 (UTC)

Revision as of 19:34, 9 February 2012

So this may need a rename

The "speculations" thing is a reference to animal and I’d like to keep it if possible, though it is a bit awkward the way it appears now. Any suggestions? — Defender1031*Talk 13:31, 9 February 2012 (UTC)

I don't think we should be putting silly references to sbemails in our article names. This is especially true given that this article does not mention the email that the reference comes from at all. It would be confusing to new readers, and doesn't look terribly professional. Sure, this is a Wiki about a cartoon full of dumb animal characters, but sometimes we need to draw the line at the silliness. So specifications all the way. --Jay stuck at home (Talk) 18:13, 9 February 2012 (UTC)
I agree with Jay. We know where the reference comes from, but I don't think references make good page titles. -132.183.4.6 19:34, 9 February 2012 (UTC)
Personal tools