Talk:Strong Bad Sings and Other Type Hits
From Homestar Runner Wiki
Strong Bad Sings and Other Type Hits is a featured article, which means it showcases an important part of the Homestar Runner body of work and/or highlights the fine work of this wiki. We also might just think it's cool. If you see a way this page can be updated or improved without compromising previous work, feel free to contribute. |
We've not imported the lyrics for this CD from the old wiki. Is this intentional? I don't think there's any other source of the lyrics online. -- Mithent 11:46, 1 Oct 2004 (MST)
- Nope, I think it's just laziness. Feel free to go for it. — InterruptorJones[[]]
I'm working on doing the lyrics to all the songs now (since the previous lyrics are now gone with the old wiki), but I'm wondering how I could best put the lyrics on the page. Any thoughts? --TheNintenGenius 13:59, 15 Oct 2004 (MST)
I suggest that the lyrics would go on separate pages with reciprocal links to this CD. See Strongbadia National Anthem. - Drhaggis 15:26, 15 Oct 2004 (MST)
Got everything except Nite Mamas and Sweet Cuppin' Cakes, as I'm having a hard time figuring out lyrics to those two. If someone else could do those, I'd be very grateful. --TheNintenGenius 18:25, 15 Oct 2004 (MST)
- I copied the stuff that was on these pages in the old Wiki. I think it's good. But take a look. -- Tom 18:50, 15 Oct 2004 (MST)
- Looks good to me. If you have access to those old pages, maybe you could check some of the lyrics I wasn't sure on in some of the songs. Or at least tell me how I could access them to doublecheck. (I know there's some lyrics I didn't get) --TheNintenGenius 19:11, 15 Oct 2004 (MST)
Contents |
Format
Whoever formated this page did an awesome job. --FireBird|Talk
Page name
I keep considering changing the name of this page to Strong Bad Sings and Other Type Hits, to fit the full name of the album. After all, the DVD set is listed under strongbad_email.exe, so I don't see why this page should be confined to just "Strong Bad Sings CD." Any thoughts? --TheNintenGenius 20:47, 24 Jan 2005 (MST)
- Amazing the things that we've overlooked for so long. I don't see any problem with renaming it. -- Tom 20:55, 24 Jan 2005 (MST)
- After having done all the moving work, I can see why nobody undertook the task before, since about a jillion pages linked using Strong Bad Sings CD. Yikes. At least now this page doesn't make me cringe every time I look at it. --TheNintenGenius 23:37, 24 Jan 2005 (MST)
- Well done. -- Tom 23:40, 24 Jan 2005 (MST)
worth it?
Is it worth it to get this cd?
Yes!!!!!!!!!!! It awsom!!!!!! and it's not just old stuff it's almost all new!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
- This... doesn't exactly belong on the discussion page. — talk Bubsty edits 00:33, 21 December 2005 (UTC)
1.21 jigawatts? Great Scott!
Could the "70 jg" on the cd be an extension of Back to the Future's mispronunciation of Giga-? As in Jigabytes? —AbdiViklas 17:42, 25 November 2005 (UTC)
- Well, it sounds plausible to me, although I may be biased as a long-time fan of the movies (as it mentions on my userpage)... Strong Bad does kinda use '80s terms. ("Japanimation", anyone?) I rather like it. --DorianGray
More People
- I don't exactly know where to put this, so I'll put it here:
- I recently got the Strong Bad Sings CD, and I noticed that in the back of that little book thing, there's about a million minor people that don't have any referance here on the wiki. Examples:
- Nick Niespodziani
- Matt Sonnickson
- Eric Park
- Rob Peck
- Shouldn't these people, and others, have some referance here, or elsewhere on the wiki? — talk Bubsty edits 01:47, 17 January 2006 (UTC)
- We do know what they did. It all says on the book... thing. And I like that idea Dorian. — talk Bubsty edits 02:00, 17 January 2006 (UTC)
Mystery Files?
Upon entering the CD into one's PC, there are 4 files visible; the QuickTime movie (These Peoples Try To Fade Me), a readme file and a couple of other files. I don't know what they're supposed to represent, if anything. Does anyone have any idea what they're on there for? Ppk01 20:38, 8 April 2006 (UTC)
- If you'll hang on a few minutes, I'll try it. —AbdiViklas 20:39, 8 April 2006 (UTC)
- The Readme simply says "If it don't work, go here and download the latest player: www.quicktime.com." Aside from the .mov, the other two files are hidden files named "Desktop DB" and "Desktop DF". I don't know a lot about these super boxes, but a quick web search shows at least that they have something to do with the Mac OS and keeping track of files on the desktop. Why they were included on the CD I'll have to leave to someone more knowledgeable. —AbdiViklas 20:47, 8 April 2006 (UTC)
Maybe I'm just an idiot...
I can't find the freaking video! Anyone have any trouble shooting tips? I'm using Windows, but it doesn't auto-play. I go to my computer, click on SUPER_SECRETS, and it just opens media player and plays the music. 70.127.93.127 22:52, 24 April 2006 (UTC)
- I dunno about Windows. Do you have a Mac? That's what I watched it on. Bluebry 23:00, 24 April 2006 (UTC)
- Thank you so feaking much! It worked! 70.127.93.127 19:21, 25 April 2006 (UTC)
BPMs
This program, applied to the songs ripped with WinAmp and with track 20 split with Audacity Portable reveals:
C:\My Music\Various Artists - Strong Bad Sings And Other Type Hits\01 - Homestar Runner - Trogdor.wav 01 - Homestar Runner - Trogdor 128.89 C:\My Music\Various Artists - Strong Bad Sings And Other Type Hits\02 - Strong Bad - The System Is Down.wav 02 - Strong Bad - The System Is Down 139.85 C:\My Music\Various Artists - Strong Bad Sings And Other Type Hits\03 - Strong Bad f-Ms. Partsmatter's 1st Grade Class - Strong Badia Anthem.wav 03 - Strong Bad f-Ms. Partsmatter's 1st Grade Class - Strong Badia Anthem 124.14 C:\My Music\Various Artists - Strong Bad Sings And Other Type Hits\04 - Marzipan - Oh Yeah Yeah.wav 04 - Marzipan - Oh Yeah Yeah 101.44 C:\My Music\Various Artists - Strong Bad Sings And Other Type Hits\05 - Limozeen - Because It's Midnite.wav 05 - Limozeen - Because It's Midnite 147.79 C:\My Music\Various Artists - Strong Bad Sings And Other Type Hits\06 - The Kinda Long-Haired Band - Circles.wav 06 - The Kinda Long-Haired Band - Circles 160.93 C:\My Music\Various Artists - Strong Bad Sings And Other Type Hits\07 - Strong Bad - Let's Get Started On Doing All Those Awesome Things I Suggested.wav 07 - Strong Bad - Let's Get Started On Doing All Those Awesome Things I Suggested 144.02 C:\My Music\Various Artists - Strong Bad Sings And Other Type Hits\08 - Taranchula - Moving Very Slowly.wav 08 - Taranchula - Moving Very Slowly 140.36 C:\My Music\Various Artists - Strong Bad Sings And Other Type Hits\09 - The Cast Of Sweet Cuppin Cakes - Sweet Cuppin' Cakes Theme Song.wav 09 - The Cast Of Sweet Cuppin Cakes - Sweet Cuppin' Cakes Theme Song 161.01 C:\My Music\Various Artists - Strong Bad Sings And Other Type Hits\10 - What's-Her-Face - I Think I Have A Chance With This Guy.wav 10 - What's-Her-Face - I Think I Have A Chance With This Guy 125.02 C:\My Music\Various Artists - Strong Bad Sings And Other Type Hits\11 - Strong Bad - It's Like It Was Meant To Be.wav 11 - Strong Bad - It's Like It Was Meant To Be 123.65 C:\My Music\Various Artists - Strong Bad Sings And Other Type Hits\12 - Limozeen - Nite Mamas.wav 12 - Limozeen - Nite Mamas 82.91 C:\My Music\Various Artists - Strong Bad Sings And Other Type Hits\13 - Marzipan f-Strong Bad - Sensitive To Bees.wav 13 - Marzipan f-Strong Bad - Sensitive To Bees 102.15 C:\My Music\Various Artists - Strong Bad Sings And Other Type Hits\14 - Strong Bad - You've Got A Ugly And Stupid Butt.wav 14 - Strong Bad - You've Got A Ugly And Stupid Butt 130.97 C:\My Music\Various Artists - Strong Bad Sings And Other Type Hits\15 - Coach Z - These Peoples Try To Fade Me.wav 15 - Coach Z - These Peoples Try To Fade Me 124.91 C:\My Music\Various Artists - Strong Bad Sings And Other Type Hits\16 - Strong Bad - The Ladies In Town All Know My Name.wav 16 - Strong Bad - The Ladies In Town All Know My Name 146.17 C:\My Music\Various Artists - Strong Bad Sings And Other Type Hits\17 - Strong Bad - The Theme From Dangeresque II- This Time It's Not Dangeresque I.wav 17 - Strong Bad - The Theme From Dangeresque II- This Time It's Not Dangeresque I 126.74 C:\My Music\Various Artists - Strong Bad Sings And Other Type Hits\18 - Strong Bad - Somebody Told Me (Now I Believe Them).wav 18 - Strong Bad - Somebody Told Me (Now I Believe Them) 122.08 C:\My Music\Various Artists - Strong Bad Sings And Other Type Hits\19 - Strong Bad, Strong Sad, And Strong Mad - The Cheat Is Not Dead.wav 19 - Strong Bad, Strong Sad, And Strong Mad - The Cheat Is Not Dead 153.31 C:\My Music\Various Artists - Strong Bad Sings And Other Type Hits\20 - Strong Bad - Everybody To The Limit (Live).wav 20 - Strong Bad - Everybody To The Limit (Live) 103.55 C:\My Music\Various Artists - Strong Bad Sings And Other Type Hits\20a - Strong Bad - Everybody To The Limit (Live).wav 20a - Strong Bad - Everybody To The Limit (Live) 103.53 C:\My Music\Various Artists - Strong Bad Sings And Other Type Hits\20b - Homestar Runner - Secret Song.wav 20b - Homestar Runner - Secret Song 107.68
--NERD42 email talk h²g² pedia uncyc 20:32, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
- Is the BPM info really relevant/necessary? I don't object to it enough to revert without a discussion, but it seems unimportant to list. - Qermaq - (T/C) 22:06, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
I was kind of thinking of people doing remixes over at the fanstuff wiki --NERD42 email talk h²g² pedia uncyc 18:18, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
- Then list it over there. In fact, some are blatantly off. "Circles" is a slower song than "i think i have a chance with this guy", clearly, but the BPM is listed as higher. Seems the computer is picking whatever note value it wants, in "Circles the eighth (NOT the beat) and in "i think i have a chance with this guy" the quarter (which does get the beat). Also, "The Cheat Is Not Dead" has two tempos, the one at the start and the one at the end. Which is it, or does this program average them (which is useless for the application you describe). I still, after a lot of thought, feel this information isn't useful, and is actually misleading. Anyone object to me stripping this info? It is listed above, anyhow. - Qermaq - (T/C) 18:42, 8 February 2008 (UTC)
Capitalization of track titles?
The capitalization of the track titles doesn't seem to match what's on the CD case ... I don't have time to fix it at the moment but I think the titles on here should be in the same case as on the CD case. --NERD42 email talk h²g² pedia uncyc 23:00, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
- I disagree. The titles are capitalized one way on the back of the cxase, another when viewing the tracks in WMP or other software. Which is the correct way? As there's no real means to solve that dilemma, "correct" capitalization (according to how it's done as a rule) has been used to make it standardized. BTW, should the video be in the track listing? It cannot be played in a CD player. I can buy Secret Song, even though it does not appear in the listing on the CD, but the video should go. It's listed lower down anyway. - Qermaq - (T/C) 23:12, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
Capitalization revisited
Isn't it Let's Get Started On Doing All Those Awesome Things I Suggested, with capital letters? Email Checkin' Dan 21:03, 5 September 2009 (UTC)
- Nope. The CD's case has it in lowercase. --DorianGray 21:05, 5 September 2009 (UTC)
- Then should we change the following?
- Trogdor to TROGDOR
- The System Is Down to The System is down
- Oh yeah yeah to Oh Yeah Yeah
- Nite Mamas to NITE MAMAS
- You've got an Ugly & Stupid Butt to You've got an Ugly & Stupid BUTT
- The theme from Dangeresque... to The theme from DANGERESQUE II...
- The Cheat is Not Dead to THE Cheat is NOT DEAD
- Everybody to the Limit [Live] to EVERYBODY TO THE LIMIT (Live)
- Email Checkin' Dan 21:09, 5 September 2009 (UTC)
- Well, should we move these? Email Checkin' Dan 21:22, 5 September 2009 (UTC)
- Not yet. We wouldn't have put them where they are without a reason. This needs more investigation before we move them. — It's dot com 21:59, 5 September 2009 (UTC)
- WHAT INVESTIGATION??? Email Checkin' Dan 22:01, 5 September 2009 (UTC)
- There's absolutely no reason to be yelling. I'm not sure what you want me to say. Did you read my post above? When we set these pages up, we wouldn't have done so arbitrarily. When I say investigation I mean look at the wiki history and the CD itself and determine why the pages are where they are now. Only after we've had a chance to do that should we then consider moving them. — It's dot com 22:06, 5 September 2009 (UTC)
- Yes, but, then why is Oh yeah yeah named the way it is? Email Checkin' Dan 22:22, 5 September 2009 (UTC)
- That'd be one of the things we're investigating. --DorianGray 22:25, 5 September 2009 (UTC)
- How's "investigating" coming along so far? Email Checkin' Dan 23:14, 5 September 2009 (UTC)
- Dude, what's your rush? This article predates the current MediaWiki wiki, created over five years ago. There's no reason to get one's underpants tied in a knot just because we haven't resolved your question within two hours after you brought it up. — It's dot com 23:29, 5 September 2009 (UTC)
- How much investigation is needed? By the time all 20 songs' history is read, we'll all forget about why we even looked through the history. So, I say, for consistancy's sake, we either, name them all properly, with Capital Letters Like So, or by the CD case and move the ones above. I think either way Oh yeah yeah should be moved to Oh Yeah Yeah. Email Checkin' Dan 21:30, 8 September 2009 (UTC)
- Okay, it's been long enough, and no ones disagreed with me, so, I'm movin' Oh yeah yeah to Oh Yeah Yeah. Email Checkin' Dan 20:53, 12 September 2009 (UTC)
- HELLO? THIS ISSUE IS STILL UNRESOLVED! Does this mean no one cares if I move them? SBE-mail Checker Dan (akka HRE-mail Checker Greg) 22:11, 29 November 2009 (UTC)
- Okay, I'm moving them to the CD case version. SBE-mail Checker Dan (akka HRE-mail Checker Greg) 20:14, 4 December 2009 (UTC)
- Well, this is great, now Jay is reverting all my moves AFTER I've moved them, but apparently no one cared BEFORE then. Now, can we finally reach "consensus" about what to do, or is the "investigation" still not finished. SBE-mail Checker Dan (akka HRE-mail Checker Greg) 20:31, 4 December 2009 (UTC)
- Let me get this straight. People are telling you not to move the pages, you continuously ask whether you should move the pages, they consistently say "no", and then when you don't get a response, you take it to mean that they changed their minds and the answer has magically become "yes"? The only one I'm not reverting is "Sensitive to Bees", because that's really what the correct capitalization should look like. --Jay (Talk) 20:32, 4 December 2009 (UTC)
- They never said no. They said they'd "investigate", but apparently they either forgot, or really don't care. Besides, These peoples try to fade me is not even CLOSE to correct capitalization. SBE-mail Checker Dan (akka HRE-mail Checker Greg) 20:34, 4 December 2009 (UTC)
- Dan gave a valid reason to want to move the pages and gave plenty of warning that he was going to do it. In my first post, I didn't say it shouldn't be done, only that it shouldn't be done yet. We asked him to wait to give us a chance to investigate. Well, we had our chance, but we never followed through. It's reasonable to ask him to wait two hours. It's not reasonable to ask him to wait three months. Since no one has put forth a solid argument why the pages should stay where they are, and since the back of the CD case is an official source, I see no reason why they shouldn't be moved (and I certainly see no reason to mass revert him after he'd already done it). — It's dot com 20:59, 4 December 2009 (UTC)
- Does this mean I have to move them all over again? Can someone else do it for me? I've had enough of the thing with the letters and you have to type 'em in. (can't remember what it's called) SBE-mail Checker Dan (akka HRE-mail Checker Greg) 21:10, 4 December 2009 (UTC)
- Dan gave a valid reason to want to move the pages and gave plenty of warning that he was going to do it. In my first post, I didn't say it shouldn't be done, only that it shouldn't be done yet. We asked him to wait to give us a chance to investigate. Well, we had our chance, but we never followed through. It's reasonable to ask him to wait two hours. It's not reasonable to ask him to wait three months. Since no one has put forth a solid argument why the pages should stay where they are, and since the back of the CD case is an official source, I see no reason why they shouldn't be moved (and I certainly see no reason to mass revert him after he'd already done it). — It's dot com 20:59, 4 December 2009 (UTC)
- They never said no. They said they'd "investigate", but apparently they either forgot, or really don't care. Besides, These peoples try to fade me is not even CLOSE to correct capitalization. SBE-mail Checker Dan (akka HRE-mail Checker Greg) 20:34, 4 December 2009 (UTC)
- Let me get this straight. People are telling you not to move the pages, you continuously ask whether you should move the pages, they consistently say "no", and then when you don't get a response, you take it to mean that they changed their minds and the answer has magically become "yes"? The only one I'm not reverting is "Sensitive to Bees", because that's really what the correct capitalization should look like. --Jay (Talk) 20:32, 4 December 2009 (UTC)
- Well, this is great, now Jay is reverting all my moves AFTER I've moved them, but apparently no one cared BEFORE then. Now, can we finally reach "consensus" about what to do, or is the "investigation" still not finished. SBE-mail Checker Dan (akka HRE-mail Checker Greg) 20:31, 4 December 2009 (UTC)
- Okay, I'm moving them to the CD case version. SBE-mail Checker Dan (akka HRE-mail Checker Greg) 20:14, 4 December 2009 (UTC)
- HELLO? THIS ISSUE IS STILL UNRESOLVED! Does this mean no one cares if I move them? SBE-mail Checker Dan (akka HRE-mail Checker Greg) 22:11, 29 November 2009 (UTC)
- Okay, it's been long enough, and no ones disagreed with me, so, I'm movin' Oh yeah yeah to Oh Yeah Yeah. Email Checkin' Dan 20:53, 12 September 2009 (UTC)
- How much investigation is needed? By the time all 20 songs' history is read, we'll all forget about why we even looked through the history. So, I say, for consistancy's sake, we either, name them all properly, with Capital Letters Like So, or by the CD case and move the ones above. I think either way Oh yeah yeah should be moved to Oh Yeah Yeah. Email Checkin' Dan 21:30, 8 September 2009 (UTC)
- Dude, what's your rush? This article predates the current MediaWiki wiki, created over five years ago. There's no reason to get one's underpants tied in a knot just because we haven't resolved your question within two hours after you brought it up. — It's dot com 23:29, 5 September 2009 (UTC)
- How's "investigating" coming along so far? Email Checkin' Dan 23:14, 5 September 2009 (UTC)
- That'd be one of the things we're investigating. --DorianGray 22:25, 5 September 2009 (UTC)
- Yes, but, then why is Oh yeah yeah named the way it is? Email Checkin' Dan 22:22, 5 September 2009 (UTC)
- There's absolutely no reason to be yelling. I'm not sure what you want me to say. Did you read my post above? When we set these pages up, we wouldn't have done so arbitrarily. When I say investigation I mean look at the wiki history and the CD itself and determine why the pages are where they are now. Only after we've had a chance to do that should we then consider moving them. — It's dot com 22:06, 5 September 2009 (UTC)
- WHAT INVESTIGATION??? Email Checkin' Dan 22:01, 5 September 2009 (UTC)
- Not yet. We wouldn't have put them where they are without a reason. This needs more investigation before we move them. — It's dot com 21:59, 5 September 2009 (UTC)
- Well, should we move these? Email Checkin' Dan 21:22, 5 September 2009 (UTC)
- All right, sorry. The moves struck me as unnecessary and it looked to me like consensus was not to change. I also didn't look closely at the dates and thought this issue was days, not months, old. My apologies for the misunderstanding. --Jay (Talk) 21:16, 4 December 2009 (UTC)
- Looking at the articles as they are now, they look pretty sloppy. Maybe we should move them to proper grammer-type names, i.e. These People Try To Fade Me, I Think I Have A Chance With This Guy, ect. SBE-mail Checker Dan 01:59, 26 January 2010 (UTC)
- So, what you are saying is, after that entire episode with you being 100% for the moving of the song's names, you want to change them all back? StrongAwesome 02:48, 26 January 2010 (UTC)
- No, no. See, there were two options to moving them, With Correct Punctuation, or as the CD case depicts it. I never really asked which one the Wikians would prefer, so I just wanted to check back and see if anyone wants them with Correct Capitalization. SBE-mail Checker Dan 19:36, 26 January 2010 (UTC)
- So, what you are saying is, after that entire episode with you being 100% for the moving of the song's names, you want to change them all back? StrongAwesome 02:48, 26 January 2010 (UTC)
- Looking at the articles as they are now, they look pretty sloppy. Maybe we should move them to proper grammer-type names, i.e. These People Try To Fade Me, I Think I Have A Chance With This Guy, ect. SBE-mail Checker Dan 01:59, 26 January 2010 (UTC)
Formatting
The heading hr crosses the floated table. Can this be repaired? I can't seem to make it happen. - Qermaq - (T/C) 23:17, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
iTunes misreading
When I put this CD on my iPod i noticed something iTunes marks Trogdor as a song by Homestar Runner. is this worth putting in remarks. (I did change the name to Strong Bad though) Mr. "UB making" Foogs.Vote now on UBs! 15:38, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
Easter Eggs
I don't think the "These peoples try to fade me" video is an easter egg. They tell you about it through the store. Don't say jorb 101
Yeah, it's not an easter egg. It's a Special Feature.
Adding scans to this page
I'm in possession of some scans from the album. Can I put them on this page? Dagoth 04:38, 20 January 2013 (UTC)
Professional Reviews
I understand this article is almost 10 years old, but should we elect to put any professional ratings or reviews on this page, like what Wikipedia does with music albums? — MichaelXX2 18:46, 12 November 2013 (UTC)
- In my opinion, no. — Defender1031*Talk 19:55, 12 November 2013 (UTC)
- Out of curiosity, what professional reviews? — Elcool (talk)(contribs) 22:02, 12 November 2013 (UTC)
- The only review Wikipedia has right now is the one from Allmusic. I thought since they have it on their page, it would be encyclopedic to include it on ours, perhaps? Just a thought, really. — MichaelXX2 23:18, 12 November 2013 (UTC)
- If SBCG4AP have links to reviews, I don't see why not here. Support. — Elcool (talk)(contribs) 11:52, 20 November 2013 (UTC)
- Since we don't have our own Album rating template, we would have to come up with some other way to provide the information. — MichaelXX2 17:07, 20 November 2013 (UTC)
- An external link should be fine. Now I see there's another music site in there. — Elcool (talk)(contribs) 04:58, 21 November 2013 (UTC)
- Since we don't have our own Album rating template, we would have to come up with some other way to provide the information. — MichaelXX2 17:07, 20 November 2013 (UTC)
- If SBCG4AP have links to reviews, I don't see why not here. Support. — Elcool (talk)(contribs) 11:52, 20 November 2013 (UTC)
- The only review Wikipedia has right now is the one from Allmusic. I thought since they have it on their page, it would be encyclopedic to include it on ours, perhaps? Just a thought, really. — MichaelXX2 23:18, 12 November 2013 (UTC)
- Out of curiosity, what professional reviews? — Elcool (talk)(contribs) 22:02, 12 November 2013 (UTC)
Template and song names
I made a draft of a redesigned {{Strong Bad Sings and Other Type Hits}} template. It's a little taller but it's got the songs organized neatly with their track numbers. (* stands for bonus. Maybe there's a better way to denote that.)
You'll notice I wrote the track names with proper capitalization rather than the page titles we currently have—I want to re-revisit that issue. I always get the impression that the list on the back of the CD case is supposed to look like it's been messily scrawled by Strong Bad. It conveys the names of the songs, but we're probably not meant to take the erratic capitalization too seriously. I think we should go with the track titles that appear in the .mp3 files. Seems like a more reliable source than Strong Bad's messy writing, plus it looks a lot better. Lira (talk) 23:34, 19 May 2019 (UTC)
- Nice! I actually like the sleek, album-like design of the template. One thing I'd like to mention about capitalization: I searched for the actual album back and I found this example (src). As you can see the original album back has this capitalization. I think that this template should honor that. --Stux 00:49, 20 May 2019 (UTC)