Talk:Strong Bad checking more than one email

From Homestar Runner Wiki

(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
(cleanup and rename)
(removing {{tbd}})
 
(includes 20 intermediate revisions)
Line 1: Line 1:
==Rename==
==Rename==
Should we rename this to [[Strong Bad answering more than one email]]? And what about capitalization?{{User:Loafing/sig}} 11:09, 22 April 2007 (UTC)
Should we rename this to [[Strong Bad answering more than one email]]? And what about capitalization?{{User:Loafing/sig}} 11:09, 22 April 2007 (UTC)
 +
:Well he doesnt really answer several of them (in spring cleaning all of them just get deleted) so "checking" may be better. As for the capitalization...I dunno. {{User:Homestar-winner/sig}} 11:17, 22 April 2007 (UTC)
 +
::Ah, yes, good point. I've removed the renaming template now. "Checking" is definitely better.{{User:Loafing/sig}} 11:21, 22 April 2007 (UTC)
==Cleanup==
==Cleanup==
The appearances list needs some work.
The appearances list needs some work.
 +
 +
== image ==
 +
 +
Anyone have any ideas of a picture we could put on the page? {{User:Homestar-winner/sig}} 12:33, 22 April 2007 (UTC)
 +
 +
== Merge ==
 +
 +
This page is a more wordy duplicate of [[Strong Bad Email Statistics#Strong Bad Emails Featuring More Than One Email]]. It should be redirected and it's content merged. {{User:E.L. Cool/sig}} 15:58, 22 April 2007 (UTC)
 +
:This page should not be merged. We can just merge the [[Strong Bad Email Statistics#Strong Bad Emails Featuring More Than One Email]] onto this page. {{User:Sam the Man/sig}}
 +
::Replace "checking" with "featuring" and capitalise all the words. We can provide a link to this article on Strong Bad Email Statistics. {{User:The Chort/sig}} 17:46, 22 April 2007 (UTC)
 +
:::I agree with Elcool: '''merge and redirect'''. {{User:4kai2lyn6/sig}} 18:02, 22 April 2007 (UTC)
 +
::::Knowing that we already have this info on the Statistics page, I have to agree with the '''merge'''. {{User:Has Matt?/sig}} 18:06, 22 April 2007 (UTC)
 +
:::::I agree with The Chort. Maybe have a short segment and one of those "Main article" things... --{{User:Super Martyo Brother/sig}} 02:07, 23 April 2007 (UTC)
 +
::::::Agree con El Chorto and Super Martyo Hermano. --[[User:DorianGray|DorianGray]] 02:11, 23 April 2007 (UTC)
 +
:::::::'''<s>Delete</s> Merge and redirect''' for the exact same reason I voted to delete that article about Hrwiki people who got their emails on Strong Bad Email: This info can already be found on Strong Bad Email Statistics. [[User:Bad Bad Guy|Bad Bad Guy]] 23:55, 10 May 2007 (UTC)
 +
::::::::I just updated that statisics section.  Now it's even safer to redirect, imho. [[User:Bad Bad Guy|Bad Bad Guy]] 20:08, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
 +
:::::::::I vote for '''merge and redirect'''. {{unsigned|DNA Evidence|20:14, 23 May 2007 (UTC)}}
 +
::::::::::'''Merge and redirect'''. {{User:Trey56/sig}} 03:03, 9 June 2007 (UTC)
 +
 +
yeah yah, totally, yah {{User:Slipknot6477/sig}} 02:30, 19 July 2007 (UTC)

Current revision as of 12:44, 22 July 2007

Contents

[edit] Rename

Should we rename this to Strong Bad answering more than one email? And what about capitalization? Loafing 11:09, 22 April 2007 (UTC)

Well he doesnt really answer several of them (in spring cleaning all of them just get deleted) so "checking" may be better. As for the capitalization...I dunno. Homestar-Winner (talk) 11:17, 22 April 2007 (UTC)
Ah, yes, good point. I've removed the renaming template now. "Checking" is definitely better. Loafing 11:21, 22 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Cleanup

The appearances list needs some work.

[edit] image

Anyone have any ideas of a picture we could put on the page? Homestar-Winner (talk) 12:33, 22 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Merge

This page is a more wordy duplicate of Strong Bad Email Statistics#Strong Bad Emails Featuring More Than One Email. It should be redirected and it's content merged. Elcool (talk)(contribs) 15:58, 22 April 2007 (UTC)

This page should not be merged. We can just merge the Strong Bad Email Statistics#Strong Bad Emails Featuring More Than One Email onto this page. User talk:Sam the Man Sam the Man
Replace "checking" with "featuring" and capitalise all the words. We can provide a link to this article on Strong Bad Email Statistics. – The Chort 17:46, 22 April 2007 (UTC)
I agree with Elcool: merge and redirect. kai lyn 18:02, 22 April 2007 (UTC)
Knowing that we already have this info on the Statistics page, I have to agree with the merge. Has Matt? (talk) 18:06, 22 April 2007 (UTC)
I agree with The Chort. Maybe have a short segment and one of those "Main article" things... --Mario2.PNG Super Martyo boing! 02:07, 23 April 2007 (UTC)
Agree con El Chorto and Super Martyo Hermano. --DorianGray 02:11, 23 April 2007 (UTC)
Delete Merge and redirect for the exact same reason I voted to delete that article about Hrwiki people who got their emails on Strong Bad Email: This info can already be found on Strong Bad Email Statistics. Bad Bad Guy 23:55, 10 May 2007 (UTC)
I just updated that statisics section. Now it's even safer to redirect, imho. Bad Bad Guy 20:08, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
I vote for merge and redirect. DNA Evidence (Talk | contribs) 20:14, 23 May 2007 (UTC) (left unsigned)
Merge and redirect. Trey56 03:03, 9 June 2007 (UTC)

yeah yah, totally, yah Slipknot6477 02:30, 19 July 2007 (UTC)

Personal tools