Talk:Strong Bad checking more than one email
From Homestar Runner Wiki
(Difference between revisions)
(cleanup and rename) |
(removing {{tbd}}) |
||
(includes 20 intermediate revisions) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
==Rename== | ==Rename== | ||
Should we rename this to [[Strong Bad answering more than one email]]? And what about capitalization?{{User:Loafing/sig}} 11:09, 22 April 2007 (UTC) | Should we rename this to [[Strong Bad answering more than one email]]? And what about capitalization?{{User:Loafing/sig}} 11:09, 22 April 2007 (UTC) | ||
+ | :Well he doesnt really answer several of them (in spring cleaning all of them just get deleted) so "checking" may be better. As for the capitalization...I dunno. {{User:Homestar-winner/sig}} 11:17, 22 April 2007 (UTC) | ||
+ | ::Ah, yes, good point. I've removed the renaming template now. "Checking" is definitely better.{{User:Loafing/sig}} 11:21, 22 April 2007 (UTC) | ||
==Cleanup== | ==Cleanup== | ||
The appearances list needs some work. | The appearances list needs some work. | ||
+ | |||
+ | == image == | ||
+ | |||
+ | Anyone have any ideas of a picture we could put on the page? {{User:Homestar-winner/sig}} 12:33, 22 April 2007 (UTC) | ||
+ | |||
+ | == Merge == | ||
+ | |||
+ | This page is a more wordy duplicate of [[Strong Bad Email Statistics#Strong Bad Emails Featuring More Than One Email]]. It should be redirected and it's content merged. {{User:E.L. Cool/sig}} 15:58, 22 April 2007 (UTC) | ||
+ | :This page should not be merged. We can just merge the [[Strong Bad Email Statistics#Strong Bad Emails Featuring More Than One Email]] onto this page. {{User:Sam the Man/sig}} | ||
+ | ::Replace "checking" with "featuring" and capitalise all the words. We can provide a link to this article on Strong Bad Email Statistics. {{User:The Chort/sig}} 17:46, 22 April 2007 (UTC) | ||
+ | :::I agree with Elcool: '''merge and redirect'''. {{User:4kai2lyn6/sig}} 18:02, 22 April 2007 (UTC) | ||
+ | ::::Knowing that we already have this info on the Statistics page, I have to agree with the '''merge'''. {{User:Has Matt?/sig}} 18:06, 22 April 2007 (UTC) | ||
+ | :::::I agree with The Chort. Maybe have a short segment and one of those "Main article" things... --{{User:Super Martyo Brother/sig}} 02:07, 23 April 2007 (UTC) | ||
+ | ::::::Agree con El Chorto and Super Martyo Hermano. --[[User:DorianGray|DorianGray]] 02:11, 23 April 2007 (UTC) | ||
+ | :::::::'''<s>Delete</s> Merge and redirect''' for the exact same reason I voted to delete that article about Hrwiki people who got their emails on Strong Bad Email: This info can already be found on Strong Bad Email Statistics. [[User:Bad Bad Guy|Bad Bad Guy]] 23:55, 10 May 2007 (UTC) | ||
+ | ::::::::I just updated that statisics section. Now it's even safer to redirect, imho. [[User:Bad Bad Guy|Bad Bad Guy]] 20:08, 23 May 2007 (UTC) | ||
+ | :::::::::I vote for '''merge and redirect'''. {{unsigned|DNA Evidence|20:14, 23 May 2007 (UTC)}} | ||
+ | ::::::::::'''Merge and redirect'''. {{User:Trey56/sig}} 03:03, 9 June 2007 (UTC) | ||
+ | |||
+ | yeah yah, totally, yah {{User:Slipknot6477/sig}} 02:30, 19 July 2007 (UTC) |
Current revision as of 12:44, 22 July 2007
Contents |
[edit] Rename
Should we rename this to Strong Bad answering more than one email? And what about capitalization? Loafing 11:09, 22 April 2007 (UTC)
- Well he doesnt really answer several of them (in spring cleaning all of them just get deleted) so "checking" may be better. As for the capitalization...I dunno. Homestar-Winner (talk) 11:17, 22 April 2007 (UTC)
- Ah, yes, good point. I've removed the renaming template now. "Checking" is definitely better. Loafing 11:21, 22 April 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Cleanup
The appearances list needs some work.
[edit] image
Anyone have any ideas of a picture we could put on the page? Homestar-Winner (talk) 12:33, 22 April 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Merge
This page is a more wordy duplicate of Strong Bad Email Statistics#Strong Bad Emails Featuring More Than One Email. It should be redirected and it's content merged. — Elcool (talk)(contribs) 15:58, 22 April 2007 (UTC)
- This page should not be merged. We can just merge the Strong Bad Email Statistics#Strong Bad Emails Featuring More Than One Email onto this page. Sam the Man
- Replace "checking" with "featuring" and capitalise all the words. We can provide a link to this article on Strong Bad Email Statistics. – The Chort 17:46, 22 April 2007 (UTC)
- I agree with Elcool: merge and redirect. kai lyn 18:02, 22 April 2007 (UTC)
- Knowing that we already have this info on the Statistics page, I have to agree with the merge. — Has Matt? (talk) 18:06, 22 April 2007 (UTC)
- I agree with The Chort. Maybe have a short segment and one of those "Main article" things... -- Super Martyo boing! 02:07, 23 April 2007 (UTC)
- Agree con El Chorto and Super Martyo Hermano. --DorianGray 02:11, 23 April 2007 (UTC)
DeleteMerge and redirect for the exact same reason I voted to delete that article about Hrwiki people who got their emails on Strong Bad Email: This info can already be found on Strong Bad Email Statistics. Bad Bad Guy 23:55, 10 May 2007 (UTC)- I just updated that statisics section. Now it's even safer to redirect, imho. Bad Bad Guy 20:08, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
- I vote for merge and redirect. — DNA Evidence (Talk | contribs) 20:14, 23 May 2007 (UTC) (left unsigned)
- Merge and redirect. Trey56 03:03, 9 June 2007 (UTC)
- I vote for merge and redirect. — DNA Evidence (Talk | contribs) 20:14, 23 May 2007 (UTC) (left unsigned)
- I just updated that statisics section. Now it's even safer to redirect, imho. Bad Bad Guy 20:08, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
- Agree con El Chorto and Super Martyo Hermano. --DorianGray 02:11, 23 April 2007 (UTC)
- I agree with The Chort. Maybe have a short segment and one of those "Main article" things... -- Super Martyo boing! 02:07, 23 April 2007 (UTC)
- Knowing that we already have this info on the Statistics page, I have to agree with the merge. — Has Matt? (talk) 18:06, 22 April 2007 (UTC)
- I agree with Elcool: merge and redirect. kai lyn 18:02, 22 April 2007 (UTC)
- Replace "checking" with "featuring" and capitalise all the words. We can provide a link to this article on Strong Bad Email Statistics. – The Chort 17:46, 22 April 2007 (UTC)
yeah yah, totally, yah Slipknot6477 02:30, 19 July 2007 (UTC)