Talk:Stylized Character Designs

From Homestar Runner Wiki

Revision as of 03:11, 5 December 2020

Title

If this page is going to stay (and I'm tempted to mark it for deletion), it really needs a better name than "Designs That Aren't Counted." Any suggestions? Homestar Coder 21:05, 15 Jul 2005 (UTC)

I was also tempted to mark this article for deletion. If we ultimately decide to keep this article, I would suggest an improved name: "Character Evolution Irregularities" —THE PAPER ^PREEEOW 21:13, 15 Jul 2005 (UTC)

I was thinking something like 'Alternate Designs'... I'm not much for naming, though.

Experimental Designs, perhaps? I know that's what they were called on the character evolution talk page for a while... Username-talk 21:18, 15 Jul 2005 (UTC)

How about Irregular Character Designs? — Elcool ^(talk)_(contribs) 07:01, 16 Jul 2005 (UTC)

I like that these designs are all grouped somewhere, so I think the page content has merit. The name has got to go, of course, and unfortunately my naming abilities are on break right now. — It's dot com 21:21, 15 Jul 2005 (UTC)

Sorry, guys. I'm not that good at making up names for stuff. Anyway, I like "Character Evolution Irregularities". Poopsmith Z

"Stylized"?! The Super NES one doesn't look.. hmm.. "stylish" to me. More like "ugly", but that is not a good headline. Still thinks that Irregular Character Designs is better — Elcool ^(talk)_(contribs) 16:33, 16 Jul 2005 (UTC)

"Stylized Character Designs" is much much better than the previous "Designs That Aren't Counted." -- Tom 16:43, 16 Jul 2005 (UTC)

It is better. But is it the best? — Elcool ^(talk)_(contribs) 23:45, 16 Jul 2005 (UTC)

"Stylized" doesnt mean "Stylish" as in "pretty" it means "using artistic forms and conventions to create effects [1] ." - Dr Haggis - Talk 23:58, 16 Jul 2005 (UTC)

Oh. Ok, now I get it. — Elcool ^(talk)_(contribs) 08:31, 17 Jul 2005 (UTC)

I like this page, but Dancin' Bubs Strong Bad kinda feels out of place... --TROGGA! 15:21, 18 Jul 2005 (UTC)

I agree. —FireBird|Talk 17:01, 18 Jul 2005 (UTC)

How was that Dancin Bubs SB picture taken anydangway? The KOT covers up most of Strong Bad. --—↑_{Darklinkskywalker}|^{Talk_|i did this stuff_}↓ 03:28, 26 Jul 2005 (UTC)

Probably using a Flash decompiler. It allows you to isolate and remove certain elements. — It's dot com 03:36, 26 Jul 2005 (UTC)

Do the drawings on the stinko manual count?-- Bkmlb(talk to me·stuff I did) 21:54, 18 Sep 2005 (UTC)

I'd think the ones of Stinkoman and 1-Up might. Maybe. They do look a bit unusual. --DorianGray

Other drawings

There are alot of drawings of charactes floting around the site. Strong Bad's head of his Screensaver, his caricature from vacation and maybe more. Are those count? — Elcool ^(talk)_(contribs) 06:16, 8 Oct 2005 (UTC)

Exaggerations

Should we have the character designs from Exaggerations in here? It seems appropriate enough.

Makes sence. Dr. Savage

Alternate Reddest Radish Angles

The Reddest Radish#DVD Version claims there are at least 3 versions. Does anyone have pictures? Bad Bad Guy 15:32, 11 May 2007 (UTC)

Ooh. Didn't someone find unused Reddest Radish designs by decompiling some more-recent toon? I could swear that happened, but can't find it right now... --DorianGray 17:25, 11 May 2007 (UTC)

Sbemail 169 Deleted Scene

So, how about the storyboards for the Sbemail 169 Deleted Scene in which Coach Z has a nose, mouth, etc.? AwkwardFire 22:12, 3 February 2008 (UTC)

Yes, I think that could count very well. --DorianGray 22:14, 3 February 2008 (UTC)

FAQ Cover

I don't think the cover of the site's FAQ should be included; the picture on the cover wasn't actually made by TBC, but was a piece of fan art they decided to use. Thus, it shouldn't count as a stylized design because it's someone else's interpretations of the characters and not the Chaps' work at all. I just wanted to see if anyone has a reason it should be kept on there before I delete it. Lucentas 03:17, 8 April 2008 (UTC)

Agree'd Dr. Savage 23:41, 2 November 2008 (UTC)

Eyes

Would Strong Bad and The Cheat with eyeballs (in your edge) count? Because they don't usually look like that. Gfdgsgxgzgdrc 04:39, 3 June 2016 (UTC)

You mean the part where it's JUST eyeballs? No. — Defender1031*Talk 09:11, 3 June 2016 (UTC)