Talk:The Knight Evolution
From Homestar Runner Wiki
(Difference between revisions)
(→Merge) |
m (→Merge: Fiddlesticks. I forgot my sig.) |
||
Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
:::Well, now that there's only two (and, for the record, I agree with removing [[KOT's VOQPCS]]), this especially doesn't need to be a separate page. {{User:StrongAwesome74/sig}} 18:22, 24 August 2010 (UTC) | :::Well, now that there's only two (and, for the record, I agree with removing [[KOT's VOQPCS]]), this especially doesn't need to be a separate page. {{User:StrongAwesome74/sig}} 18:22, 24 August 2010 (UTC) | ||
::::Okay. I'll put this [[The Knight|here]] and you guys may delete it. {{User:Wasd98/sig}} 23:57, 8 September 2010 (UTC) | ::::Okay. I'll put this [[The Knight|here]] and you guys may delete it. {{User:Wasd98/sig}} 23:57, 8 September 2010 (UTC) | ||
- | :I agree. If the article only shows two stages of evolution, then it's not much of an article. '''Merge.''' | + | :I agree. If the article only shows two stages of evolution, then it's not much of an article. '''Merge.''' {{User:DENNIS/sig}} 00:07, 9 September 2010 (UTC) |
Revision as of 00:07, 9 September 2010
Merge
Much like Stinkoman, The Goblin, Nebulon, and others, the evolution is too short to be its own page. I sugest a merge with The Knight. StrongAwesome 20:44, 17 August 2010 (UTC)
- I agree. Also, stylistic designs do not go on the main evolution page. PowerPie 12:36, 18 August 2010 (UTC)
- Merge. There's not enough major changes to warrent an article. cash money tc 13:08, 18 August 2010 (UTC)
- Well, now that there's only two (and, for the record, I agree with removing KOT's VOQPCS), this especially doesn't need to be a separate page. StrongAwesome 18:22, 24 August 2010 (UTC)
- Okay. I'll put this here and you guys may delete it. Rondleman! Stuff I did.Talk. 23:57, 8 September 2010 (UTC)
- Well, now that there's only two (and, for the record, I agree with removing KOT's VOQPCS), this especially doesn't need to be a separate page. StrongAwesome 18:22, 24 August 2010 (UTC)
- Merge. There's not enough major changes to warrent an article. cash money tc 13:08, 18 August 2010 (UTC)
- I agree. If the article only shows two stages of evolution, then it's not much of an article. Merge. DENNIS T/C 00:07, 9 September 2010 (UTC)