Talk:The Knight Evolution
From Homestar Runner Wiki
(Difference between revisions)
(Merge with knight) |
(→Already on the Knight's Own article) |
||
| (includes 13 intermediate revisions) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| - | {{ | + | {{deletedtalk|merge=The Knight}} |
== Merge == | == Merge == | ||
Much like [[Stinkoman]], [[The Goblin]], [[Nebulon]], and others, the evolution is too short to be its own page. I sugest a merge with [[The Knight]]. {{User:StrongAwesome74/sig}} 20:44, 17 August 2010 (UTC) | Much like [[Stinkoman]], [[The Goblin]], [[Nebulon]], and others, the evolution is too short to be its own page. I sugest a merge with [[The Knight]]. {{User:StrongAwesome74/sig}} 20:44, 17 August 2010 (UTC) | ||
:I agree. Also, stylistic designs do ''not'' go on the main evolution page. {{User:Power Pie/sig}} 12:36, 18 August 2010 (UTC) | :I agree. Also, stylistic designs do ''not'' go on the main evolution page. {{User:Power Pie/sig}} 12:36, 18 August 2010 (UTC) | ||
| + | ::'''Merge'''. There's not enough major changes to warrent an article. {{User:Movie magic man/sig}} 13:08, 18 August 2010 (UTC) | ||
| + | :::Well, now that there's only two (and, for the record, I agree with removing [[KOT's VOQPCS]]), this especially doesn't need to be a separate page. {{User:StrongAwesome74/sig}} 18:22, 24 August 2010 (UTC) | ||
| + | ::::Okay. I'll put this [[The Knight|here]] and you guys may delete it. {{User:Wasd98/sig}} 23:57, 8 September 2010 (UTC) | ||
| + | :I agree. If the article only shows two stages of evolution, then it's not much of an article. '''Merge.''' {{User:DENNIS/sig}} 00:07, 9 September 2010 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==KOT DVD old== | ||
| + | shouldn't we have the old version of the knight here? it is difernt from the newer one's disine. it will make the page bigger too --[[User:Jfilesguy|that guy who is Jfiles]] 15:25, 20 June 2011 (UTC) | ||
| + | ==Already on the Knight's Own article== | ||
| + | Anyone knows this is not a Seprate article please anyone edit the Knight's Page by removing it or delete this article, so anyone agree? | ||
| + | {{User:Kenster/sig}} 23:18, 20 September 2014 (UTC) | ||
Current revision as of 19:41, 30 June 2018
|
[edit] Merge
Much like Stinkoman, The Goblin, Nebulon, and others, the evolution is too short to be its own page. I sugest a merge with The Knight. StrongAwesome
20:44, 17 August 2010 (UTC)
- I agree. Also, stylistic designs do not go on the main evolution page. Power
Pie 12:36, 18 August 2010 (UTC)
- Merge. There's not enough major changes to warrent an article. cash money tc 13:08, 18 August 2010 (UTC)
- Well, now that there's only two (and, for the record, I agree with removing KOT's VOQPCS), this especially doesn't need to be a separate page. StrongAwesome
18:22, 24 August 2010 (UTC)
- Okay. I'll put this here and you guys may delete it. Rondleman!
Stuff I did.Talk. 23:57, 8 September 2010 (UTC)
- Okay. I'll put this here and you guys may delete it. Rondleman!
- Well, now that there's only two (and, for the record, I agree with removing KOT's VOQPCS), this especially doesn't need to be a separate page. StrongAwesome
- Merge. There's not enough major changes to warrent an article. cash money tc 13:08, 18 August 2010 (UTC)
- I agree. If the article only shows two stages of evolution, then it's not much of an article. Merge. DENNIS T/C 00:07, 9 September 2010 (UTC)
[edit] KOT DVD old
shouldn't we have the old version of the knight here? it is difernt from the newer one's disine. it will make the page bigger too --that guy who is Jfiles 15:25, 20 June 2011 (UTC)
[edit] Already on the Knight's Own article
Anyone knows this is not a Seprate article please anyone edit the Knight's Page by removing it or delete this article, so anyone agree?
Kenster|Talk|Contribs 23:18, 20 September 2014 (UTC)
