Talk:The Periodic Table of Candy Elements

From Homestar Runner Wiki

(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
(Put the table on its own page or in the toon's trivia section?: keep here)
(clarify vote. (It's Dot Com has a good point re: size change))
Line 36: Line 36:
# {{User:Joshua/sig}}
# {{User:Joshua/sig}}
# {{User:Has Matt?/sig}}
# {{User:Has Matt?/sig}}
#{{User:The Paper/sig}}
#{{User:The Paper/sig}} (only if size is retained)
#{{User:Rogue Leader/sig}}
#{{User:Rogue Leader/sig}}

Revision as of 20:29, 22 March 2006


Put the table on its own page or in the toon's trivia section?

Um, I'm not sure a page like this will be needed. I think the table (and following fun facts) in candy product are enough. ...I guess we'll see when it's finished. - Joshua 21:26, 21 March 2006 (UTC)

I concur. Mathgrant 22:26, 21 March 2006 (UTC)

Okay, I liked this information on the page itself, personally. This is information describing the toon, so I think it belongs on the toon's page. The graph isn't that unweildly, is it? - Joshua 23:09, 21 March 2006 (UTC)

{In MLS Marzipan voice} Yeah, me too! Has Matt? (talk) 23:16, 21 March 2006 (UTC)

I think it looked a little awkward on the page, but i doubt it will appear in any other emails so it should stay with the candy product page itself. --Collin 23:44, 21 March 2006 (UTC)

All though I some what agree with Collin, this really deserves it's own page. It really look huge on the email page. --Dacheatbot · Communicate 00:03, 22 March 2006 (UTC)
I'm fine with it. Besides, it could be used to have a link from Marshie's page to here as something about the whole marshmallow cloud thing. --אוקאלייליי (Ookelaylay)
Well, if The Candy Bar gets its own page why shouldn't this? I don't think that'll appear again. --Dacheatbot · Communicate 01:56, 22 March 2006 (UTC)
The Candy Bar is an item. Tons of one-time items get there own pages. This is more of a... background. Plus this information is part of the email, so it belongs on its page. The Candy Bar page's is just supplementary, and not essential, to learning everything there is to know about the email. - Joshua 01:58, 22 March 2006 (UTC)
I have an idea. Lets put this on the Candy Bar Page Under Ingredients. --Dacheatbot · Communicate 02:01, 22 March 2006 (UTC)
"Uh, yeah. That's not true." - Joshua 02:16, 22 March 2006 (UTC)

What? --Dacheatbot · Communicate 02:29, 22 March 2006 (UTC)

These aren't the ingredients of the candy bar. Well, some of them may be, but not enough to be placed there. And were you even listening to my comment earlier? How would putting them on that page address the issues I brought up? -_-; - Joshua 02:31, 22 March 2006 (UTC)
Yeah, I gotta vote that this can probably just be shrunk and merged with the candy product page. Thunderbird 03:17, 22 March 2006 (UTC)

I didn't really like it on candy product. I vote for expanding it and leaving it here.

I suggested moving the periodic table here because when it was on the email page it was rather distracting and seemed out of place. There's no harm in its having its own page, and the email page's look is cleaner without it. Qermaq - (T/C) Image:Qermaqsigpic.png 05:57, 22 March 2006 (UTC)

If it is eventually merged into candy product, I'd like for it to be made smaller. It was way too big when it was on there before. Qermaq - (T/C) Image:Qermaqsigpic.png 19:52, 22 March 2006 (UTC)

If reducing its size is the price we have to pay for moving it, then I think we should leave it here. — It's dot com 20:19, 22 March 2006 (UTC)

Keep Here

  1. Heimstern Läufer
  2. --Dacheatbot · Communicate
  3. Qermaq - (T/C) Image:Qermaqsigpic.png
  4. Mithent (too cluttered otherwise)
  5. DBK!
  6. Elcool (talk)(contribs)
  7. אוקאלייליי (Ookelaylay)
  8. It's dot com (or don't reduce size)

Move Back

  1. Joshua
  2. Has Matt? (talk)
  3. —THE PAPER PREEEOW (only if size is retained)
  4. DorianGray
  5. Rogue Leader / (my talk)

Colors of table

I don't know whether to ask this here or on the toon talk or where, so I'll start here: Shouldn't we make the labels full black, or at least a darker color? They were only gray in the toon because they were a background element. — It's dot com 23:27, 21 March 2006 (UTC)

I was thinking that too. It sounds fine to me either way, but if we sharpen the black, we should probably sharpen the other colors too. - Joshua 23:53, 21 March 2006 (UTC)
I loaded the table into Photoshop and autocorrected the contrast. Then I used those values to resaturate the colors here. — It's dot com 00:07, 22 March 2006 (UTC)
I for one would like to see the text more black. Qermaq - (T/C) Image:Qermaqsigpic.png 05:59, 22 March 2006 (UTC)
The colors as they are now are what they would have been if they hadn't been lightened for the background. Besides, the dark blue color is nice. — It's dot com 06:14, 22 March 2006 (UTC)
Oh, I must have been remembering an old version. The text is fine now. Qermaq - (T/C) Image:Qermaqsigpic.png 06:17, 22 March 2006 (UTC)
Personal tools