Talk:Unnamed Characters
From Homestar Runner Wiki
Why are we deleting this? Kvb 19:53, 3 Jun 2005 (UTC)
- I see how this could become a decent page, but for now I really don't like it. If we keep it it'll need major work. And what's with the made-up names for the Marshmallow crowd? —FireBird|Talk 19:53, 3 Jun 2005 (UTC)
- The idea of this page is good, but it will mix characters from differnet worlds. You can clearly see that characters from MLS are completely different from a "character" we know is played by Bubs. Those can not fit together. For this kind of thing I stated Old Characters. E.L. Cool 22:28, 3 Jun 2005 (UTC)
- I like this article, but it should be limited to characters that have never been named. Bubs' character should not be here as he is playing someone else, but its still Bubs. keep it for all the characters without any names at all, real or unreal -- Tony Stony 14:54, 4 Jun 2005 (UTC)
- I definately agree: Bubs is out of place. Aurora the Homestar Coder 15:53, 4 Jun 2005 (UTC)
no he's in place losers we don't know the badguys name!-anynonomous I just don't like this page. An unnamed "character" who's just a placeholder isn't really a character. --TROGGA! 23:32, 5 Jun 2005 (UTC)
- But we do need to mantion them somewhere. Do you think we need a full page article about That Alian Guy? We don't. So we thats why we have this page for. E.L. Cool 05:45, 6 Jun 2005 (UTC)
I think these "characters" can just be "mantioned" in the transcripts. Should we add the penguin from Experimental Film and the Dogbert-like character from dullard? --TROGGA! 20:23, 6 Jun 2005 (UTC)
- I don't see why not. E.L. Cool 20:58, 6 Jun 2005 (UTC)
I hope you're joking. --TROGGA! 02:45, 7 Jun 2005 (UTC)
If he's not, I'm ready. --Technochocolate 05:30, 10 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Please don't delete!!
Why delete it? It's very useful, you know. -Kinsey
- Actually, it really isn't. There is literally no useful information here, except for "The Alien Guy" being the only source of nudity. —FireBird|Talk 02:32, 8 Jun 2005 (UTC)
- But consider the alternative...would you rather have one useless page devoted to unnamed characters or lots of useless pages devoted to each character seperatly? These characters need to be on the wiki, because you never know if people might actually be interested in finding out something about someone. -- Tony Stony 02:42, 8 Jun 2005 (UTC)
- Ok, lemmie give you an example. A while back, before my wiki days I was really into Homestar Runner in its own right. One day I discovered the old games menu, and began playing. I noticed a character I had never seen at all before. Had I known about a wiki at that point, I would have loved to see someone else acnowledge her and also to have somewhere to discuss the posibiility of her becoming some other character. It doesnt matter if you see it as useful, but some random user might be really curious about the character (or lack thereof). As a wiki, we have the responsibility to categorize everything (within some reason) for other users to benifit. -- Tony Stony 02:46, 8 Jun 2005 (UTC)
- Well I'm certainly not saying your position is wrong. I just consider myself a liberal wiki editor. -- Tony Stony 02:55, 8 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Everything needs to be documented, the only question is how much weight the thing gets. Grouping this things that we are unlikely to see again together is a good idea, however naming and formating needs to be standardized.- Dr Haggis - Talk 03:52, 8 Jun 2005 (UTC)
What's wrong with this page? It lists unnamed characters. What if people want to know how many unnamed characters there are? I really don't think it needs to be deleted. -Darklinkskywalker
He's right. With this, we'll be able to delete the individual pages, and the bandwidth will never be exceeded again! Besides, what kind of heartless jerks are you, to leave these pageless characters out on "the streets"? What if somebody wanted to delete a page you like? Think about that. --Technochocolate 03:34, 10 Jun 2005 (UTC)
- Who cares if some user likes a page? That doesn't stop us. They'll (you'll) just have to go along with it. Big deal. And you're way off if you think deleting a couple of pages will stop bandwith problems. —FireBird|Talk 00:59, 11 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Theres nothing useful about a crowd with 10 of the 12 people already named!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
- Keep it. It's useful to add to and for reference. You know, for like, seeing all of somebody's appearances or something. I dunno. Forget I even wrote that. Please. --daunrealist 01:02, 23 Jun 2005 (UTC)
This is a legitmate, good, article that has a lot of information and does NOT deserve to be deleted. Come on. It's a great page! -User: Tapd260
According to a certain quote on this page, we may be planning to move Main Page Characters here. Therefore I think it would be a good Idea to keep one of them here - probably this one - so we kan move one of them to the other so we won't lose them both. They may be useful to us later. --Darklinkskywalker 22:07, 9 Jul 2005 (UTC) POST #2= --Darklinkskywalker 23:01, 14 Jul 2005 (UTC)
Please, if just for the sake of the little unamed girl with a medal, let us keep this page, so that it may grow in its anonymity and the anonymity of these wonderful, unknown characters. The Smoking Monkey 16:43, 26 Jul 2005 (UTC)
Keep. We have other lists, why not one more? — It's dot com 20:55, 26 Jul 2005 (UTC)
Keep as is This page has merit. There will be other unnamed characters in the future, and if you delete this, where will we put them? also, this page will be expanded when the main page characters page gets moved to here. User:Rogue Leader.sig
We should keeep this page. It tells info about characters with no name. Without this, where will the info of those characters go?
