Talk:Vector Strong Bad

From Homestar Runner Wiki

Revision as of 16:15, 25 September 2011 by Ngamer01 (Talk | contribs)
(diff) ← Older revision | Current revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to: navigation, search
Ding! Vector Strong Bad is a featured article, which means it showcases an important part of the Homestar Runner body of work and/or highlights the fine work of this wiki. We also might just think it's cool. If you see a way this page can be updated or improved without compromising previous work, feel free to contribute.


Contents

[edit] Crap... just crap

I personally think it is crap - bad development! Maybe a child could do better...? --194.154.180.195 10:04, 18 Nov 2004 (MST)

Actually, there were lots of games just like this in the early days. Perhaps you're just too young to have played them? I fondly remember hailing "3D Vector Breakout" as the best...game...EVER! to my friends ^_^ --Southpaw018 09:53, 18 Nov 2004 (MST)

Or he's just a 10-year-old moron that can't get the joke that that's how vector games look like.

I already made a 3-D Strong Bad redirect page. Does anyone think that this page should be moved to 3-D Strong Bad? —2Fast2Furious 10:14 pm, 16 Feb 2006

  • What do you think, Bubsty? Is Vector Strong Bad's real name 3-D Strong Bad? —2Fast2Furious 9:24 am, 20 March 2006
No. Vector is more exact name, as technically almost all Strong Bads are "3-D". - Joshua 15:40, 22 March 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Screenshot

Hmm... that screenshot really squishes the text up. But if it was made any smaller, the details wouldn't be visible. Perhaps this screenshot should be un-thumbnail'd? --Upsilon 19:29, 29 Nov 2004 (MST)

It seems fine to me. Maybe it's Firefox. --69.37.127.205 22:54, 10 Dec 2004 (MST)
Do you mean that Firefox is causing the problem, or that it solves it? --Upsilon 11:24, 21 Dec 2004 (MST)

[edit] 20X6?

Do you think he could be counted into the 20X6 characters as well, due to him being a training simulator for Stinkoman? Evan

Let's wait till further connections are made. We don't know at present what in this email is real and what's in our heads. Qermaq - (T/C) Image:Qermaqsigpic.png 06:30, 5 April 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Character Evolution

The "newer" design of Vector Strong Bad also debuted in the same email that the "older" design debuted, on the box cover in video games. Can it be counted as an evolution if both designs appeared in the same toon? Has Matt? (talk) 12:42, 13 April 2006 (UTC)

Ah yes, I forgot about the boxes in video games... I thought the box was only on Videlectrix, which came out afterwards, which would keep the chronology going... Hmm, I'm not sure though. They're certainly different designs though, and should be noted. Though certainly the "Evolution" table is not the way to do it. --phlip TC 12:47, 13 April 2006 (UTC)
Problems have now been fixed. Has Matt? (talk) 00:40, 14 April 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Obscenities

So was it just me or when the Vector Strong Bad first came out, did it sound like he was saying Back off, b**** — 67.42.143.131 (Talk | contribs) (left unsigned)

No. It is (and was) definately "Baby". --phlip TC 22:53, 27 May 2006 (UTC)
Personal tools