Talk:Wormdingler

From Homestar Runner Wiki

Revision as of 00:42, 16 January 2008

Needed?

C'mon now, is this really needed? It isn't really a major part in dragon or Trogday 08. I think it still should be a redirect. Sam the Man 22:37, 14 January 2008 (UTC)

Well, if it was unneeded, why clean it up, then? Why not just put it back as a redirect in the first place? --DorianGray 22:39, 14 January 2008 (UTC)

The information should not be deleted. It's got a nice little image and everything. Perhaps merge all the dragons from dragon into a Dragons page (Trogdor and The S is for Sucks would be listed, but would keep their own articles). — It's dot com 22:41, 14 January 2008 (UTC)

I have to agree. A Dragon or Other Trogdors page might work. Sam the Man 22:42, 14 January 2008 (UTC)

A page called Dragons makes a lot of sense. Then this can redirect there. OptimisticFool 22:52, 14 January 2008 (UTC)

I think wormlinger may be the next homsar no need to merge the pages — Physicsguymonsterman (Talk | contribs) 22:53, 14 January 2008 (UTC) (left unsigned)

Keep the page! Wormlinger will be the next xesome character. — 98.16.161.46 (Talk | contribs) 23:01, 14 January 2008 (UTC) (left unsigned)

Those last 2 comments need reasons, IMHO. I agree with the preceeding posts and think we should merge with Dragons. Bad Bad Guy 23:11, 14 January 2008 (UTC)

I vote merginate. CompGrl323 (talk · edits) 23:21, 14 January 2008 (UTC)

And now for a chant. Merge! Merge! Merge! Merge! Merge! Merge! Merge! Merge! Visorbot 386 01:22, 15 January 2008 (UTC)

I think we should keep, actually. We have pages for things more minor than this. (The S is for Sucks itself was pretty-dang-minor before the most recent cartoon.) And it's now been referred to by name. -DAGRON 01:47, 15 January 2008 (UTC)

agree with DAGRON. keep. --Acam30 02:33, 15 January 2008 (UTC)

Notability guidelines say H*R specific items and characters only need one mention. Common practice gives further sanction to named characters. Keep Flashfight 02:42, 15 January 2008 (UTC)

I say keep to. heck there's a page for karrot kazoo hill. If tbc ever does more with Troggy wormlinger will show his face as he will with coach z as coach z's bride — Physicsguymonsterman (Talk | contribs) 12:42, 15 January 2008 (UTC) (left unsigned)

I think it's safe to say Trogdor will continue to appear. As for "Wormdingler", though, while I can easily see it reappearing, I kinda doubt it'll become anything especially important. It's not like it had a prominent role in Trogday 08, either... just used in an Easter egg to make a joke. That said, I don't have any opinion on the merit of this page. -YK 20:50, 15 January 2008 (UTC)

I disagree with Psychics, sure Karrot and Kazzo Hill has a page, but it can't really be merged effectively, whereas there's no reason why WormDingler cannot be put into the Dragons page, with its full description. As is, the Dragons page looks very bland and empty. If it becomes a more major character later, it'll be deserving of its own page, but for now it just...isn't.

The S is for Sucks dragon's notability isn't directly relevant here. It had another appearance between Trogday 08 and dragon, and now it has an entire song devoted to it. Even though Coach Z gave his drawing a name, I don't think it rises to the level of character or even pseudocharacter. It's just a drawing. I think displaying all the drawings on one page makes the most sense, at least until Wormdingler is featured in a more substantial way. — It's dot com 21:38, 15 January 2008 (UTC)

Hmm... Given that there're many more pages of dubious merit than this one that're perfectly all right, I can only actually see one problem with *this* page. Namely, it tries to take a simple sketch and make it into a character, which in context, it isn't. The page itself is all right, but it's basically miscatagorized, and I don't think "Wormdingler" deserves to be in any "cast lists". -YK 00:42, 16 January 2008 (UTC)

Make Edits

We need to expand this pagePhysicsguymonsterman

How? I think we've said everything that can be said about it. This is all the info there is. --DorianGray 20:46, 15 January 2008 (UTC)

Compound Article

Hey, you know how there's an article on the middle school varients of the members of free contry, US of A? could we make an article like that, but with the strange attemps to draw trogdor? — Haldo (Talk | contribs) 21:37, 15 January 2008 (UTC) (left unsigned)

That's a terrific idea that I wholly support. I only wish I had thought of it first in the section above. — It's dot com 21:40, 15 January 2008 (UTC)

Yeah, that would have been nice, then we could have avoided having to think of it again. — Defender1031*Talk 21:43, 15 January 2008 (UTC)

This is exactly whats being discussed up top but listen here I hsve sn Idea

We make a dragons page and dragons such as trogador and this one and even tasters choice (which with 1 appearance got its own page) are listed but also more important ones (like this) have there own page too