User talk:The Mu

From Homestar Runner Wiki

Revision as of 21:15, 17 March 2007 by The Joe (Talk | contribs)
Jump to: navigation, search

Post here and I'll get to you in a little while. If it's urgent, you can always try the fanstuff version.


Download links

Hey there The Mu. I don't think we need a download link for every little thing on the main page. We should just hit the most important things, like toons. — It's dot com 19:09, 18 May 2006 (UTC)

And Quote of the Week? If there's a download button for QotW, then there should be a download button for Podstar Runner. --Da M-izz-uTizzalk 19:10, 18 May 2006 (UTC)
Except that you did the QotW link too. Did you want me to remove that one as well? I originally left it because I thought there was a decent enough chance that those might be clicked on. — It's dot com 19:21, 18 May 2006 (UTC)
...I did no such thing. Those little boxes are actually new to me. Go in the history, I had no partaking in that. --Da M-izz-uTizzalk 19:44, 18 May 2006 (UTC)
I'm sorry. I was confusing you with The Teach!. — It's dot com 19:46, 18 May 2006 (UTC)
Oh. But that's beside the point. I would use those buttons. --Da M-izz-uTizzalk 19:47, 18 May 2006 (UTC)
I think we could remove the QotW download links. I don't think very many people use the Main Page for downloading files. You use them, but does anyone else? Do people who just view the wiki on a casual basis find them useful? -- Tom 19:49, 18 May 2006 (UTC)

Not quite standard, but not quite v

The edit of flashback by wasn't TECHNICALLY vandalism. Somehow, a large portion of the page was removed by E.L. Cool a few days ago, and Mr. IP was somehow the first to notice. He was trying to re-add the Strong Bad Email template, but in an unconventional format. Just a heads up. And knowing is half the battle and all that nonsense. --Jay (Talk) 21:07, 31 May 2006 (UTC)


Hey, Mu. Re: this edit: yeah, automatic redirects won't go to a specific page location, just to the page itself. Though, there's no harm in adding them, as if someone found themself on the "no redirect" version of the page, clicking the link will cause the browser to jump to the section. Qermaq - (T/C) Image:Qermaqsigpic.png 20:34, 13 August 2006 (UTC)

Alright. Thanks. ¤ The Dang, Pom Pom, you see that? That's a nice golbol. Talk to me. 20:56, 13 August 2006 (UTC)


When writing subtitles, please make sure to follow all the rules. I'm getting very tiring of cleaning up after you. (Transcript all spoken dialogue, and copy your text from the official transcript.) - Joshua 15:05, 29 August 2006 (UTC)

FYI, "es" is correct as it's the Wikipedia:ISO 639 language code for Spanish. — User:ACupOfCoffee@ 15:59, 29 August 2006 (UTC)
Joshua: I knew that, and I was planning to get around to fixing it before you decided to take on the project.
CupOfCoffe: OK. ¤ The Dang, Pom Pom, you see that? That's a nice golbol. Talk to me. 19:02, 29 August 2006 (UTC)


Hey, Mu. This edit: now if the anonny didn't know how to see he was reverted, how will he read your comment? Remember, with anonnys and new users, they don't probably even know about RC or History. Unbelievable but true. Keep on doin' this like Brutus! Qermaq - (T/C) Image:Qermaqsigpic.png 19:54, 2 December 2006 (UTC)

Wait, if they don't know about the RC or History, then how can they know how they got reverted, even if we put down a summary?--H*Bad 19:59, 2 December 2006 (UTC)
They may not even understand the concept of "revert". They may say, "Hey, I can add something? Cool!" and go and do it. Then when they call their friend over to see what they just added: "Hey, it must not have taken or something. Let me add it back." I just made that up, but you see the point.
In this specific case, the user may have seen he was reverted actually. Trey's correction was incorporated, and the anonny may well have thought that was fixed now. If we assume that's true, then Mu's "didn't you see you were reverted?" would probably have been seen as a little insulting. Summaries should address the why, not "Shut up, kid." Anyway, that's my take. Qermaq - (T/C) Image:Qermaqsigpic.png 20:06, 2 December 2006 (UTC)
No I mean, if a new user doesn't know about the RC or History, then how can they possibly see what they did wrong. So really, they could just keep adding it and adding it over and over, and would never know that someone was reverting him.--H*Bad 20:08, 2 December 2006 (UTC)
Absolutely. That's why, with signed-in users, we offer help on their Talk page. In the case of an anonny, it's more complicated, but if an anonny were to try the same mistake a few times in a row one would be in their right to put a polite comment on the talk for the IP. That way they'll read it once they see the big ugly orange box. Qermaq - (T/C) Image:Qermaqsigpic.png 20:35, 2 December 2006 (UTC)

My answer about yourself

Yes, that IS great that you are 13, and you live in New Hampshire. But what city in that state do you live at? -Viklas

It's great that you're creepy! (Also, if you knew me well enough, you would know what state I live in.) ¤ The Dang, Pom Pom, you see that? That's a nice golbol. Talk to me. 19:30, 14 March 2007 (UTC)
Ahem, you basically called me creepy, so I guess there is no choice but to block you for until you stop calling me something that is like: (cheeky ba***rd;creepy;stupid;a**hole;smarta**,etc.). I will give 2 chances, but if you blow them, game over, dude! -Viklas
... WHAT? ¤ The Dang, Pom Pom, you see that? That's a nice golbol. Talk to me. 01:00, 15 March 2007 (UTC)

Define spam please...

I'll define your mom. ¤ The Dang, Pom Pom, you see that? That's a nice golbol. Talk to me. 21:05, 17 March 2007 (UTC)
Please do not feed the trolls. Just revert till a sysop takes care of the blocking. - link_icon.gifThe Joe(Talk) 21:15, 17 March 2007 (UTC)

--NotOffensive 21:15, 17 March 2007 (UTC)

Personal tools