Talk:Lack of Visible Arms
From Homestar Runner Wiki
It's dot com (Talk | contribs) (→Page Title: reply) |
(→Page Title) |
||
Line 20: | Line 20: | ||
::::Well, I did propose Ambiguous Arms earlier... - {{User:Kookykman/sig}} | ::::Well, I did propose Ambiguous Arms earlier... - {{User:Kookykman/sig}} | ||
:::::"Ambiguous Arms" is a step in the right direction, although something about it (maybe the alliteration?) doesn't sound quite right to me. — [[User:It's dot com|It's dot com]] 23:14, 17 October 2005 (UTC) | :::::"Ambiguous Arms" is a step in the right direction, although something about it (maybe the alliteration?) doesn't sound quite right to me. — [[User:It's dot com|It's dot com]] 23:14, 17 October 2005 (UTC) | ||
+ | ::::Ambiguous is hard to spell. How about... ''{brain locks up}'' - {{User:Joshua/sig}} |
Revision as of 23:16, 17 October 2005
The King of Town also doesn't appear to have any visible arms (nor does the Prince of Town in flashback), but no direct reference is made to this.
He just gave me the bird!
- Homestar flips Strong Bad off, and Strong Bad reacts as if he can see it.
I think the joke in the bird was that Homestar "flips off" Strong Bad by responding "right back at you" to Strong Bad's Single Deuce, as if he didn't even need to flip a hand. Understand? --Sam Goldfish 22:31, 17 October 2005 (UTC)
- ...Actually, you're right, I think. --DorianGray
Pic?
Which do you think we should use for this article's picture? I'm for Homestar's "arms" from fingers.-Kookykman(t)(c)(r)
Page Title
Invisible Arms? I don't think that Homestar, Marzi & KOT have arms at all. I think it's some kind of force field or something. I mean, the fact about time capsule (Homestar holding three things at once) was already declined on STUFF because the majority of people here think it's not clear that Homestar has arms as such. Can we get a better name for this page? And perhaps remove that dubious fact? Homestar Coder 23:06, 17 October 2005 (UTC)
- How about "Ambiguious Arms" or simply "Arms"? Kookykman
(t)(c)(r)
- I don't like just "arms" because this page is actually about lack of arms. Say, how about "Lack of Arms" ;) Homestar Coder
23:08, 17 October 2005 (UTC)
- "Lack of Arms" has the same problem that "Invisible Arms" has. Namely, it assumes as fact one of the possible explanations for the situation. (I admit I chose "Invisible Arms" because that's the camp I'm in. Is there something (besides just "Arms") that is more neutral?) — It's dot com 23:10, 17 October 2005 (UTC)
- Well, I did propose Ambiguous Arms earlier... - Kookykman
(t)(c)(r)
- "Ambiguous Arms" is a step in the right direction, although something about it (maybe the alliteration?) doesn't sound quite right to me. — It's dot com 23:14, 17 October 2005 (UTC)
- Ambiguous is hard to spell. How about... {brain locks up} - Joshua
- Well, I did propose Ambiguous Arms earlier... - Kookykman
- "Lack of Arms" has the same problem that "Invisible Arms" has. Namely, it assumes as fact one of the possible explanations for the situation. (I admit I chose "Invisible Arms" because that's the camp I'm in. Is there something (besides just "Arms") that is more neutral?) — It's dot com 23:10, 17 October 2005 (UTC)
- I don't like just "arms" because this page is actually about lack of arms. Say, how about "Lack of Arms" ;) Homestar Coder