Talk:The Diapersmith
From Homestar Runner Wiki
(Difference between revisions)
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
*I concur. I really don't think this merits its own article. -[[User:GG Crono|GG Crono]] | *I concur. I really don't think this merits its own article. -[[User:GG Crono|GG Crono]] | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
:For some reason though, this isn't too bad an article. And he's so ''cute''! If similar quality articles were made for the other baby-types, I don't think it would be a problem. I do notice that their images made it to the character articles fairly quickly. I think people like to look at these things, and it must be the cute factor. -- [[User:Tom|Tom]] 04:16, 12 January 2006 (UTC) | :For some reason though, this isn't too bad an article. And he's so ''cute''! If similar quality articles were made for the other baby-types, I don't think it would be a problem. I do notice that their images made it to the character articles fairly quickly. I think people like to look at these things, and it must be the cute factor. -- [[User:Tom|Tom]] 04:16, 12 January 2006 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 19:30, 15 January 2006
This should be merged with The Poopsmith or one of the variations pages. — It's dot com 03:52, 12 January 2006 (UTC)
- I concur. I really don't think this merits its own article. -GG Crono
- For some reason though, this isn't too bad an article. And he's so cute! If similar quality articles were made for the other baby-types, I don't think it would be a problem. I do notice that their images made it to the character articles fairly quickly. I think people like to look at these things, and it must be the cute factor. -- Tom 04:16, 12 January 2006 (UTC)
