HRWiki talk:Userboxes
From Homestar Runner Wiki
(Difference between revisions)
ACupOfCoffee (Talk | contribs) (fix) |
(Wah! My idea!) |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
:I think the templates could either be converted to generic source code like the others or tweaked to fit if they don't already. — [[User:It's dot com|It's dot com]] 00:38, 7 February 2006 (UTC) | :I think the templates could either be converted to generic source code like the others or tweaked to fit if they don't already. — [[User:It's dot com|It's dot com]] 00:38, 7 February 2006 (UTC) | ||
::Meant to type "tables", not "templates". {{User:ACupOfCoffee/sig}} 22:12, 7 February 2006 (UTC) | ::Meant to type "tables", not "templates". {{User:ACupOfCoffee/sig}} 22:12, 7 February 2006 (UTC) | ||
| + | :::Generic source code is good. Userboxes should be versatile, so if a user wants to change a bit of text, they can do so without creating a new template. Besides, saves a whole bunch of template creations. And that's my six cents. - {{User:Super_Sam/sig}} 05:28, 8 February 2006 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 05:28, 8 February 2006
So how are those of us who already had babel boxes on our pages, but as templates, supposed to use this? Are languages eventually going into this? — User:ACupOfCoffee@ 00:36, 7 February 2006 (UTC)
- I think the templates could either be converted to generic source code like the others or tweaked to fit if they don't already. — It's dot com 00:38, 7 February 2006 (UTC)
- Meant to type "tables", not "templates". — User:ACupOfCoffee@ 22:12, 7 February 2006 (UTC)
- Generic source code is good. Userboxes should be versatile, so if a user wants to change a bit of text, they can do so without creating a new template. Besides, saves a whole bunch of template creations. And that's my six cents. - Super Sam 05:28, 8 February 2006 (UTC)
- Meant to type "tables", not "templates". — User:ACupOfCoffee@ 22:12, 7 February 2006 (UTC)
