HRWiki talk:Userboxes
From Homestar Runner Wiki
(Difference between revisions)
(I made one!) |
(→I made one!) |
||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
== I made one! == | == I made one! == | ||
| - | {{babel|border=#000000|mainbkgd=#FFFFFF|codebkgd=#0000FF|codecolor=#FFFFFF|code=WASTE|msg=You have watsed your time reading this | + | {{babel|border=#000000|mainbkgd=#FFFFFF|codebkgd=#0000FF|codecolor=#FFFFFF|code=WASTE|msg=You have watsed your time reading this.}} |
Revision as of 00:53, 10 February 2006
So how are those of us who already had babel boxes on our pages, but as templates, supposed to use this? Are languages eventually going into this? — User:ACupOfCoffee@ 00:36, 7 February 2006 (UTC)
- I think the templates could either be converted to generic source code like the others or tweaked to fit if they don't already. — It's dot com 00:38, 7 February 2006 (UTC)
- Meant to type "tables", not "templates". — User:ACupOfCoffee@ 22:12, 7 February 2006 (UTC)
- Generic source code is good. Userboxes should be versatile, so if a user wants to change a bit of text, they can do so without creating a new template. Besides, saves a whole bunch of template creations. And that's my six cents. - Super Sam 05:28, 8 February 2006 (UTC)
- I just have a WP:Babel box and a HRWiki:Babel box. works great! — Elcool (talk)(contribs) 10:29, 8 February 2006 (UTC)
- Generic source code is good. Userboxes should be versatile, so if a user wants to change a bit of text, they can do so without creating a new template. Besides, saves a whole bunch of template creations. And that's my six cents. - Super Sam 05:28, 8 February 2006 (UTC)
- Meant to type "tables", not "templates". — User:ACupOfCoffee@ 22:12, 7 February 2006 (UTC)
I made one!
|-
|| WASTE | You have watsed your time reading this. |
