Talk:The Diapersmith

From Homestar Runner Wiki

(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
(order fix)
Line 1: Line 1:
This should be merged with [[The Poopsmith]] or one of the variations pages. — [[User:It's dot com|It's dot com]] 03:52, 12 January 2006 (UTC)
This should be merged with [[The Poopsmith]] or one of the variations pages. — [[User:It's dot com|It's dot com]] 03:52, 12 January 2006 (UTC)
-
*I concur. I really don't think this merits its own article. -[[User:GG Crono|GG Crono]]
+
:For some reason though, this isn't too bad an article. And he's so ''cute''!  If similar quality articles were made for the other baby-types, I don't think it would be a problem. I do notice that their images made it to the character articles fairly quickly.  I think people like to look at these things, and it must be the cute factor. -- [[User:Tom|Tom]] 04:16, 12 January 2006 (UTC)
-
 
+
:I concur. I really don't think this merits its own article. -[[User:GG Crono|GG Crono]]
-
 
+
-
:For some reason though, this isn't too bad an article. And he's so ''cute''!  If similar quality articles were made for the other baby-types, I don't think it would be a problem. I do notice that their images made it to the character articles fairly quickly.  I think people like to look at these things, and it must be the cute factor. -- [[User:Tom|Tom]] 04:16, 12 January 2006 (UTC)
+

Revision as of 02:56, 25 February 2006

This should be merged with The Poopsmith or one of the variations pages. — It's dot com 03:52, 12 January 2006 (UTC)

For some reason though, this isn't too bad an article. And he's so cute! If similar quality articles were made for the other baby-types, I don't think it would be a problem. I do notice that their images made it to the character articles fairly quickly. I think people like to look at these things, and it must be the cute factor. -- Tom 04:16, 12 January 2006 (UTC)
I concur. I really don't think this merits its own article. -GG Crono
Personal tools