Talk:Strong Bad Email Records
From Homestar Runner Wiki
(Difference between revisions)
It's dot com (Talk | contribs) (about the content) |
(disambig) |
||
| (includes 3 intermediate revisions) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| - | Yep... I was a bit over hasty on this. I think that [[Strong Bad Emails | + | Yep... I was a bit over hasty on this. I think that [[Strong Bad Emails By Length]] and [[Strong Bad Email Statistics]] would cover this... but which one should we redirect to? Or should we disimbig? {{User:Rogue Leader/sig}} 22:23, 10 October 2006 (UTC) |
| - | :I think a disambig might work nicely. It depends on how you take the word "records". If you mean " | + | :I think a disambig might work nicely. It depends on how you take the word "records". If you mean "unsurpassed measurements", then By Length is the place to go. If you mean "information or facts", then Statistics is what you want. — [[User:It's dot com|It's dot com]] 22:28, 10 October 2006 (UTC) |
::I also think that the information on this page is slightly different from By Length, and should be preserved somehow. Perhaps we could adjust the formatting of the table and add a note that reads "Emails in bold were the longest email at the time of their release" or something. — [[User:It's dot com|It's dot com]] 22:30, 10 October 2006 (UTC) | ::I also think that the information on this page is slightly different from By Length, and should be preserved somehow. Perhaps we could adjust the formatting of the table and add a note that reads "Emails in bold were the longest email at the time of their release" or something. — [[User:It's dot com|It's dot com]] 22:30, 10 October 2006 (UTC) | ||
| + | :::This page could be a great section in Statistics, but it's not enough for it's own page. {{User:E.L. Cool/sig}} 09:28, 11 October 2006 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | The information on this page has been merged into [[Strong Bad Emails By Length]] yesterday. I'm turning this into a disambig page, as Dot Com suggested.{{User:Loafing/sig}} 10:33, 11 October 2006 (UTC) | ||
Current revision as of 10:33, 11 October 2006
Yep... I was a bit over hasty on this. I think that Strong Bad Emails By Length and Strong Bad Email Statistics would cover this... but which one should we redirect to? Or should we disimbig? Rogue Leader / (my talk) 22:23, 10 October 2006 (UTC)
- I think a disambig might work nicely. It depends on how you take the word "records". If you mean "unsurpassed measurements", then By Length is the place to go. If you mean "information or facts", then Statistics is what you want. — It's dot com 22:28, 10 October 2006 (UTC)
- I also think that the information on this page is slightly different from By Length, and should be preserved somehow. Perhaps we could adjust the formatting of the table and add a note that reads "Emails in bold were the longest email at the time of their release" or something. — It's dot com 22:30, 10 October 2006 (UTC)
- This page could be a great section in Statistics, but it's not enough for it's own page. — Elcool (talk)(contribs) 09:28, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
- I also think that the information on this page is slightly different from By Length, and should be preserved somehow. Perhaps we could adjust the formatting of the table and add a note that reads "Emails in bold were the longest email at the time of their release" or something. — It's dot com 22:30, 10 October 2006 (UTC)
The information on this page has been merged into Strong Bad Emails By Length yesterday. I'm turning this into a disambig page, as Dot Com suggested. Loafing
10:33, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
