Talk:Pony Fights 2
From Homestar Runner Wiki
DorianGray (Talk | contribs) (Reply. =3) |
|||
| (includes 11 intermediate revisions) | |||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
OK, but I'm pending deletion. [[User:Sam Goldfish|Sam Goldfish]] | OK, but I'm pending deletion. [[User:Sam Goldfish|Sam Goldfish]] | ||
| + | |||
| + | :You need a better reason than "The Wiki doesn't need this article." That's circular. {{User:Homestar Coder/sig}} 18:41, 13 October 2005 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | It's a one-time joke with information that could be easily placed in [[Commandos in the Classroom]]. --[[User:Sam Goldfish|Sam Goldfish]] 18:52, 13 October 2005 (UTC) | ||
| + | :What's more, it only appears for a few seconds (as mentioned in the article). {{User:Gafaddict/sig}} 18:53, 13 October 2005 (UTC) | ||
| + | ::Those are better arguments. However, the Pony Fights movie is mentioned several times in Commandos in the Classroom, so I would rather keep this article. {{User:Homestar Coder/sig}} 18:59, 13 October 2005 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | It has a nice description and image. I can foresee an instance where one would want to link to this article without having to link to the whole toon. And like H*C said, it's fine to have. — [[User:It's dot com|It's dot com]] 19:00, 13 October 2005 (UTC) | ||
| + | :I agree with both H*C and It's dot com. That's what these little pages are for, I think: so they can be linked to easily without having to link to the whole toon. --[[User:DorianGray|DorianGray]] | ||
| + | :2nd. {{User:Bubsty/sig}} 02:44, 22 December 2005 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | If this article was bigger and covered a more significant topic, I owuld have it nominated for featured article. As it stands however, it is just an article on something that made a short appearance in a cheat commandos toon. Didn't an article only qualify if it had at least ''three'' mentions? [[User:The Big Eye|The Big Eye]] 05:46, 15 December 2006 (UTC) | ||
| + | :No, that standard is only for running gag qualifications. There's a lot of one-shot articles floating around. Most aren't bad, actually. --[[User:DorianGray|DorianGray]] | ||
| + | |||
| + | I definitely agree that it isn't bad; as I mentioned before it was very well done. Anyway, thanks for replying within seconds, | ||
| + | and thank you for enlightening me. [[User:The Big Eye|The Big Eye]] 05:50, 15 December 2006 (UTC) | ||
| + | :Oh, any time. =3 But not every time. That's too much work. --[[User:DorianGray|DorianGray]] | ||
Current revision as of 05:56, 15 December 2006
Am i allowed to {{stub}} this?
Do we really need this article? Seriously. Sam Goldfish
- No, but it's fine to have. Leave it be. Homestar Coder
18:33, 13 October 2005 (UTC)
OK, but I'm pending deletion. Sam Goldfish
- You need a better reason than "The Wiki doesn't need this article." That's circular. Homestar Coder 18:41, 13 October 2005 (UTC)
It's a one-time joke with information that could be easily placed in Commandos in the Classroom. --Sam Goldfish 18:52, 13 October 2005 (UTC)
- What's more, it only appears for a few seconds (as mentioned in the article). —Gafaddict
(Talk | Contribs.) 18:53, 13 October 2005 (UTC)
- Those are better arguments. However, the Pony Fights movie is mentioned several times in Commandos in the Classroom, so I would rather keep this article. Homestar Coder 18:59, 13 October 2005 (UTC)
- Those are better arguments. However, the Pony Fights movie is mentioned several times in Commandos in the Classroom, so I would rather keep this article. Homestar Coder
It has a nice description and image. I can foresee an instance where one would want to link to this article without having to link to the whole toon. And like H*C said, it's fine to have. — It's dot com 19:00, 13 October 2005 (UTC)
- I agree with both H*C and It's dot com. That's what these little pages are for, I think: so they can be linked to easily without having to link to the whole toon. --DorianGray
- 2nd. — talk Bubsty edits 02:44, 22 December 2005 (UTC)
If this article was bigger and covered a more significant topic, I owuld have it nominated for featured article. As it stands however, it is just an article on something that made a short appearance in a cheat commandos toon. Didn't an article only qualify if it had at least three mentions? The Big Eye 05:46, 15 December 2006 (UTC)
- No, that standard is only for running gag qualifications. There's a lot of one-shot articles floating around. Most aren't bad, actually. --DorianGray
I definitely agree that it isn't bad; as I mentioned before it was very well done. Anyway, thanks for replying within seconds, and thank you for enlightening me. The Big Eye 05:50, 15 December 2006 (UTC)
- Oh, any time. =3 But not every time. That's too much work. --DorianGray
