Talk:The Cheat's Privileges
From Homestar Runner Wiki
(Difference between revisions)
It's dot com (Talk | contribs) (would you care to expound on the merits of the *article* rather than the person who made it?) |
|||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
::::Well, it hasn't been deleted. You wanna kill it, fine. Kill it if you must. The lone voice of the creator can hardly defend an article if I have 4 outside influences voting against it. Just adds to the red side of the ratio.{{User:Ten Ten/sig}} 21:35, 29 May 2007 (UTC) | ::::Well, it hasn't been deleted. You wanna kill it, fine. Kill it if you must. The lone voice of the creator can hardly defend an article if I have 4 outside influences voting against it. Just adds to the red side of the ratio.{{User:Ten Ten/sig}} 21:35, 29 May 2007 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | :::::In other words, you're unnecessarily making this personal again. Would you care to expound on the merits of the ''article'' rather than the person who made it? — [[User:It's dot com|It's dot com]] 21:38, 29 May 2007 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 21:38, 29 May 2007
I think this is all pretty well covered on privileges. — Has Matt? (talk) 21:21, 20 April 2006 (UTC)
- I second that. And even if it wasn't, it's not really an inside joke. -Unknownwarrior33 00:39, 16 May 2006 (UTC)
- Okay, a year later, why is this here? It does seem redundant. — It's dot com 21:30, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
- Yep... It's not like they were ever mentioned again, either. --DorianGray 21:32, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
- Okay, a year later, why is this here? It does seem redundant. — It's dot com 21:30, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
- In other words, you're unnecessarily making this personal again. Would you care to expound on the merits of the article rather than the person who made it? — It's dot com 21:38, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
