Talk:Drugs
From Homestar Runner Wiki
Defender1031 (Talk | contribs) (cleanup) |
(Questionable reference?) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
==Cleanup== | ==Cleanup== | ||
This is a good find, and this article has a lot of potential, however, it is badly organized. Instead of a "Use in cartoons" and a "Pills" section, there should only be one standard "Appearances" category. Also, the current format of the page is incorrect. {{User:DeFender1031/sig}} 16:41, 10 June 2007 (UTC) | This is a good find, and this article has a lot of potential, however, it is badly organized. Instead of a "Use in cartoons" and a "Pills" section, there should only be one standard "Appearances" category. Also, the current format of the page is incorrect. {{User:DeFender1031/sig}} 16:41, 10 June 2007 (UTC) | ||
| + | ==4/20?== | ||
| + | The linking to fan stuff that says "Happy 4/20" in the illegal drugs article is a bit of a problem. The phrase in this case could be harmless (the birthday cake is simply for someone who has a birthday on 20 April), and not a drug reference. But if it is, it's still oblique, since it's graffiti slang for marijuana (I see such tags all the time, unfortunately). I'm not sure if the reference should be removed or reworded. What do you think, sirs? {{User:Wbwolf/sig}} 14:07, 12 July 2007 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 14:07, 12 July 2007
Cleanup
This is a good find, and this article has a lot of potential, however, it is badly organized. Instead of a "Use in cartoons" and a "Pills" section, there should only be one standard "Appearances" category. Also, the current format of the page is incorrect. — Defender1031*Talk 16:41, 10 June 2007 (UTC)
4/20?
The linking to fan stuff that says "Happy 4/20" in the illegal drugs article is a bit of a problem. The phrase in this case could be harmless (the birthday cake is simply for someone who has a birthday on 20 April), and not a drug reference. But if it is, it's still oblique, since it's graffiti slang for marijuana (I see such tags all the time, unfortunately). I'm not sure if the reference should be removed or reworded. What do you think, sirs? wbwolf (t | ed) 14:07, 12 July 2007 (UTC)
