Category talk:Articles for Discussion
From Homestar Runner Wiki
(Difference between revisions)
Bad Bad Guy (Talk | contribs) (New page: If the first 2 discussions were too short or had too few participants, would it still be stupid to tag an article 3 times for deletion? ~~~~) |
(reply) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
If the first 2 discussions were too short or had too few participants, would it still be stupid to tag an article 3 times for deletion? [[User:Bad Bad Guy|Bad Bad Guy]] 22:01, 3 October 2007 (UTC) | If the first 2 discussions were too short or had too few participants, would it still be stupid to tag an article 3 times for deletion? [[User:Bad Bad Guy|Bad Bad Guy]] 22:01, 3 October 2007 (UTC) | ||
| + | :It would certainly be a bad idea to tag an article for deletion only a few weeks after it was just discussed, if that's what you're thinking. One where the discussion has been closed for quite some time, maybe, but if you're still thinking of [[Modestly Hot Homsar]], yes, bad idea. {{User:Heimstern Läufer/sig}} 22:05, 3 October 2007 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 22:05, 3 October 2007
If the first 2 discussions were too short or had too few participants, would it still be stupid to tag an article 3 times for deletion? Bad Bad Guy 22:01, 3 October 2007 (UTC)
- It would certainly be a bad idea to tag an article for deletion only a few weeks after it was just discussed, if that's what you're thinking. One where the discussion has been closed for quite some time, maybe, but if you're still thinking of Modestly Hot Homsar, yes, bad idea. Heimstern Läufer
22:05, 3 October 2007 (UTC)
