User talk:Thewi2kbug
From Homestar Runner Wiki
(Difference between revisions)
(→Data sidebars) |
Thewi2kbug (Talk | contribs) (→EMAIL) |
||
Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
== EMAIL == | == EMAIL == | ||
I was just wondering, did you do anything special to get your email answered (i.e. send the email a million times, send from different addresses, send TBC cookies, etc.), or did you just send it like, once and, that was it? | I was just wondering, did you do anything special to get your email answered (i.e. send the email a million times, send from different addresses, send TBC cookies, etc.), or did you just send it like, once and, that was it? | ||
+ | |||
+ | I send my e-mail twice, but just a secret, after watching [[montage]] so many times, writing about the paper's demise would be fitting for the e-mail number it was foretold in (#173). [[the paper]] {{user:Thewi2kbug/sig}} 18:22, 17 December 2007 (UTC) |
Revision as of 18:22, 17 December 2007
For most of all previous talk topics go to Archive Zero Talk
Data sidebars
I have a question regarding user data sidebars, do you by chance manufacture them? Wi2K Talk-Favorites-173 23:10, 12 June 2007 (UTC)
- Do you mean userboxes? If so, there are instructions near the top of that page. — It's dot com 23:15, 12 June 2007 (UTC)
- See User Data is what im refering to...
Wi2K Talk-Favorites-173 00:03, 13 June 2007 (UTC)
- With such a high number of young users, having that be a community template wouild probably lead to problems. I see no reason why you wouldn't be free to do it on your page, and even allow other users to copy and use the code on theirs if they wish. - Qermaq - (T/C)
00:33, 13 June 2007 (UTC)
- I have no problem with everyone using this, I would like to see what one of the sysops or admins say about it, due to the code is more template-oriented.
Wi2K Talk-Favorites-173 00:42, 13 June 2007 (UTC)
- I agree with what Qermaq said. There currently isn't a need for a full template. It's nifty, though. — It's dot com 00:53, 13 June 2007 (UTC)
- When there becomes a need, can you keep this in consideration?
Wi2K Talk-Favorites-173 00:59, 13 June 2007 (UTC)
- I'd submit that the subpage demonstration is appropriate as a "project page" and that sure, we as a community should keep an open mind on this, and at any such time this seems a good direction I say do it. - Qermaq - (T/C)
01:06, 13 June 2007 (UTC)
- We have actually discussed this before on the talk page for Template:Infobox_User and have come to the consensus to delete it (which is why you unfortunately can't read the discussion). Loafing
01:07, 13 June 2007 (UTC)
- "I see no reason why you wouldn't be free to do it on your page, and even allow other users to copy and use the code on theirs if they wish. - Qermaq" - I have created the code that is not template based, that other people can use, it can be found here: Non-Template Version.
Wi2K Talk-Favorites-173 02:09, 13 June 2007 (UTC)
- "I see no reason why you wouldn't be free to do it on your page, and even allow other users to copy and use the code on theirs if they wish. - Qermaq" - I have created the code that is not template based, that other people can use, it can be found here: Non-Template Version.
- I'd submit that the subpage demonstration is appropriate as a "project page" and that sure, we as a community should keep an open mind on this, and at any such time this seems a good direction I say do it. - Qermaq - (T/C)
- When there becomes a need, can you keep this in consideration?
- I agree with what Qermaq said. There currently isn't a need for a full template. It's nifty, though. — It's dot com 00:53, 13 June 2007 (UTC)
- I have no problem with everyone using this, I would like to see what one of the sysops or admins say about it, due to the code is more template-oriented.
- With such a high number of young users, having that be a community template wouild probably lead to problems. I see no reason why you wouldn't be free to do it on your page, and even allow other users to copy and use the code on theirs if they wish. - Qermaq - (T/C)
- See User Data is what im refering to...
I was just wondering, did you do anything special to get your email answered (i.e. send the email a million times, send from different addresses, send TBC cookies, etc.), or did you just send it like, once and, that was it?
I send my e-mail twice, but just a secret, after watching montage so many times, writing about the paper's demise would be fitting for the e-mail number it was foretold in (#173). the paper Wi2K Talk-Favorites-173 18:22, 17 December 2007 (UTC)