User talk:Trogga
From Homestar Runner Wiki
(Difference between revisions)
(→Derailed Emails) |
(→Derailed Emails: yeah, but) |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
Hey Trogga, I saw you deleted the "derailed email" "inside references" from all articles. I agree that these aren't inside references, but what is your reasoning for deleting them completely?{{User:Loafing/sig}} 03:45, 18 December 2007 (UTC) | Hey Trogga, I saw you deleted the "derailed email" "inside references" from all articles. I agree that these aren't inside references, but what is your reasoning for deleting them completely?{{User:Loafing/sig}} 03:45, 18 December 2007 (UTC) | ||
:Like I said in one of my edit summaries, we don't note when a email is [[poorly written emails|poorly written]] on a email page. --[[User:Trogga|Trogga]] 05:42, 18 December 2007 (UTC) | :Like I said in one of my edit summaries, we don't note when a email is [[poorly written emails|poorly written]] on a email page. --[[User:Trogga|Trogga]] 05:42, 18 December 2007 (UTC) | ||
| + | ::Hmmm, but isn't that a completely different beast? Emails aren't written poorly by TBC, but when Strong Bad ignores the contents of an email or does the opposite of what the email asks, then that is a relevant pattern that should be noted in the article, imho.{{User:Loafing/sig}} 10:17, 18 December 2007 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 10:17, 18 December 2007
Derailed Emails
Hey Trogga, I saw you deleted the "derailed email" "inside references" from all articles. I agree that these aren't inside references, but what is your reasoning for deleting them completely? Loafing
03:45, 18 December 2007 (UTC)
- Like I said in one of my edit summaries, we don't note when a email is poorly written on a email page. --Trogga 05:42, 18 December 2007 (UTC)
- Hmmm, but isn't that a completely different beast? Emails aren't written poorly by TBC, but when Strong Bad ignores the contents of an email or does the opposite of what the email asks, then that is a relevant pattern that should be noted in the article, imho. Loafing 10:17, 18 December 2007 (UTC)
- Hmmm, but isn't that a completely different beast? Emails aren't written poorly by TBC, but when Strong Bad ignores the contents of an email or does the opposite of what the email asks, then that is a relevant pattern that should be noted in the article, imho. Loafing
