User talk:Ahhhlehhh

From Homestar Runner Wiki

Revision as of 12:35, 18 July 2008 (edit) Ahhhlehhh (Talk | contribs) ← Older edit		Revision as of 12:37, 18 July 2008 (edit) (undo) Ahhhlehhh (Talk | contribs) Newer edit →
Line 1:		Line 1:
-	== Notice ==	+	==Murray & Hernstein==
-	If you notice my IP switching, it's because at some times, I'll be logged in at school, and sometimes at home. However, my home IP is the same as blocked user 98E. If you see my using the same IP as him, don't mistake me for a sockpuppet, I'm his younger brother. - [[User:Super48|Super48]] 13:55, 4 May 2007 (UTC)	+
-	How old does my account have to be to edit semi-protected pages? - [[User:Super48|Super48]] 15:27, 4 May 2007 (UTC)	+	DavidYork71, I will not disagree that Murray & Hernstein's work constitutes valid, if imperfect, sociological science. However, the associated graph is obviously quite controversial. Mainspace isn't censored, but there is really no reason to host it in userspace, where it will inform hardly anyone, and may be used against you. [[User:Proabivouac|Proabivouac]] 06:42, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
-	:4 days. --[[User:ais523|ais523]] 15:33, 4 May 2007 ([[User:ais523|U]][[User talk:ais523|T]][[Special:Contributions/Ais523|C]])	+	:I dont' understand what it is trying to say - or what David is trying to say by using it. [[User:Merbabu|Merbabu]] 13:13, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
-	::Thanks! - [[User:Super48|Super48]] 15:34, 4 May 2007 (UTC)	+	::Apologies, I suppose it does not come from M&H after all. David, I presume nothing in particular about what you are trying to say; I am only offering friendly advice, which you are free to ignore.[[User:Proabivouac|Proabivouac]] 14:35, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
		+	:::The story is I was trawling throught NPOV disputes trying to eliminate a few where articles had been reactively tagged without describing points of variance or reasons on talk, which I see quite a lot. I learned that not just articles, but also maps, graphs and even pictures got the treatment. This graph was one of them.  It sits here in honour of all those - we all know the type - who will reactively tag information of all kinds because they don't like the truths it may reveal about a subject.[[User:DavidYork71|DavidYork71]] 09:16, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
-	==Pork Lo mein==	+	==I and S==
-	I have deleted the recipes you added to [[Pork Lo mein]] according to [[WP:NOT#IINFO|this policy]]. Nothing personal. :) Maybe you can add them to [[Wikibooks]]. - [[User:Twooars|'''''TwoOars''''']] <sup>([[User_Talk:Twooars|<font color="green">T</font>]] | [[Special:Contributions/Twooars|<font color="green">C</font>]])</sup> 18:49, 4 May 2007 (UTC)\	+	I gave my reasons on the talk for that edit. Please revert yourself. [[User:Arrow740|Arrow740]] 09:42, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
-	:That's okay. We'll just keep them as external links. - [[User:Super48|Super48]] 18:51, 4 May 2007 (UTC)	+	::Thanks. [[User:Arrow740|Arrow740]] 09:54, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
		+	:"However, despite abolitionist views sourced from some influential scholars of Islam." There aren't any. You are overreacting here. Please don't edit the intro, it's a concensus version produced by a neutral editor. [[User:Arrow740|Arrow740]] 09:53, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
-	== Your edit to [[:Image:Upload.PNG]] ==	+	Three reverts every twenty-four hours is not an entitlement. It is better to avoid undoing another person's work if possible. Try to integrate what you want to say with what others want to say, and take it slowly. After all, no one who is blocked is able to contribute to the article. [[User:Tom harrison|Tom Harrison]] <sup>[[User talk:Tom harrison|Talk]]</sup> 13:54, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
-	Just so you know, that edit was sort of wrong. Why? Because:	+
-	#It's not a fair use image, Wikipedia screenshots are free.	+	I understand your point, but there is no exception to 3rr that alows you to revert factually incorrect material. [[User:Tom harrison|Tom Harrison]] <sup>[[User talk:Tom harrison|Talk]]</sup> 14:05, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
-	#It's not orphaned, it's on my page.	+
-	#And it doesn't need 2 copyright tags.	+
-	Not to be mean or anything, though. - [[User:Super48|Super48]] 18:27, 4 May 2007 (UTC)	+	On that page I have only that one reversion in 24 hours and I've self-reverted myself twice upon request from Arrow[[User:DavidYork71|DavidYork71]] 14:11, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
-	:Well, actually, only the web page itself is free. Internet Explorer and the Windows taskbar are not. I could crop the browser and taskbar out of the picture, but I didn't think it was worth it. If you'd really like to keep the screenshot, though, I can do that for you. —[[User:Remember the dot|Remember the dot]] <sup>([[User talk:Remember the dot|talk]])</sup> 20:27, 4 May 2007 (UTC)	+	==Another Arabic-English verification issue==
-	::Okay, crop it, and then re-upload it. - [[User:Super48|Super48]] 20:29, 4 May 2007 (UTC)	+	Hi David. Could you please give me some time to look at your [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3AFayssalF&diff=117299342&oldid=117256193 request]? Probably, i can do that this week-end. I am a bit busy w/ the military wikiproject for now. Cheers. -- ''[[User:FayssalF|<font size="2px" face="Verdana"><font color="DarkSlateBlue">FayssalF</font></font>]]'' - <small>[[User talk:FayssalF|<font style="background: gold"><sup>''Wiki me up ®''</sup></font>]]</small> 15:35, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
		+	:OK. I'm very interested to know more about Muhammad's slaves. Who they were, what he used them for, why they were slaves, and just generally what we can be most sure about on this subject so many centuries later.[[User:DavidYork71|DavidYork71]] 00:12, 26 March 2007 (UTC)
-	:::Actually, I just re-took the screenshot with Firefox. The screenshot you took was of Internet Explorer 6, which does not display most transparent images properly. You need to upgrade to Internet Explorer 7 or Firefox to view transparent images properly. —[[User:Remember the dot|Remember the dot]] <sup>([[User talk:Remember the dot|talk]])</sup> 20:47, 4 May 2007 (UTC)	+	==Image tagging==
		+	David York, you've got a number of images tagged with the {{[[Template:attribution|attribution]]}} tag like [[:Image:Gravelnevada.JPG|this one]] and yet you've not provided any sort of proof of this. Would you kindly review the images [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Log&user=DavidYork71 you have uploaded] and correct this? Information on image licensing is an important necessity when Wikipedia uses such content. {{User:Netscott/s1.js}} 15:35, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
-	== Image use policy ==	+	== My comments ==
-	Please '''urgently''' take a moment to read up on [[WP:F]] and [[WP:IUP]]. After {{li|Lloydbanks.PNG}}, I also had to delete	+	Please do not break my comments. --[[User:Aminz|Aminz]] 21:57, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
-	* {{li|Lomein.PNG}} which you copied from [http://www.chinesefooddiy.com/pork_lo_mein.htm here] and mislabeled as {{tl|PD-ineligible}},	+	==Image tagging for Image:Arabslaverwomen.jpg==
-	* <s>{{li|Sarge.GIF}}, a commercial South Park image which you mislabeled as {{tl|self}}.</s>	+	Thanks for uploading '''[[:Image:Arabslaverwomen.jpg]]'''. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.
-	'''Please note: Works found on the Internet are (almost) always copyrighted and we must respect that copyright.''' Persistent copyright violators will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Thanks, [[User:Sandstein|Sandstein]] 15:50, 5 May 2007 (UTC)	+
-	:I didn't upload Sarge.GIF, damn it! And how can an image of LO mein be copyrighted? - [[User:Super48|Super48]] 15:58, 5 May 2007 (UTC)	+
-	::Yes, I now see that you didn't upload Sarge.GIF. On the contrary, you correctly tagged it as {{tl|PUIdisputed}}. Sorry.	+
-	::As to Lo mein, under [[United_States_copyright_law|US law]] every photograph is [[copyright]]ed, unless it meets the narrow exception of [[Bridgeman Art Library v. Corel Corp.]] (mere reproduction of a public domain two-dimensional work of art). [[User:Sandstein|Sandstein]] 16:13, 5 May 2007 (UTC)	+
-	:::But I didn't copy it, I edited it. - [[User:Super48|Super48]] 16:21, 5 May 2007 (UTC)	+
-	::::Even if you edited [http://www.chinesefooddiy.com/images/pork-lo-mein.jpg this image] before uploading it to Wikipedia, you created a [[derivative work]] and thereby violated the copyright on the original image. [[User:Sandstein|Sandstein]] 16:34, 5 May 2007 (UTC)	+
-	:::::But I had permission from the site. - [[User:Super48|Super48]] 16:36, 5 May 2007 (UTC)	+
-	::::::Can you show that permission to us, please? [[User:Sandstein|Sandstein]] 16:45, 5 May 2007 (UTC)	+
-	:::::::I have no clue what you mean. - [[User:Super48|Super48]] 16:46, 5 May 2007 (UTC)	+
-	::::::::We must be able to prove that the image has indeed been released into the public domain, or that it has been licenced under a free licence. Can you reproduce an e-mail or other exchange with the legitimate rights holder that states this? [[User:Sandstein|Sandstein]] 17:09, 5 May 2007 (UTC)	+
-	==Fair use orphaned template==	+
-	The template that says an image has a fair use rationale but is orphaned is {{tl|Orphaned fairuse not replaced|month=May|day=3|year=2007}}<font face="Trebuchet MS"> —  [[User:Iridescenti|<font color="orangered">'''irides'''</font><font color="darkviolet">'''centi'''</font>]] [[User_talk:Iridescenti|<small><font color="chocolate"><i>(talk to me!)</i></font></small>]]</font> 20:07, 5 May 2007 (UTC)	+
-	==Sailor Mouth==	+	For more information on using images, see the following pages:
-	Please use reliable sources. TV.com is not a reliable source. Besides the issue of the mention of this word has been HEAVILY discussed on it's talk page. It is not critical to the episode to exactly know what word is used, it is not actually confirmable from the episode itself, and there is no reliable source from the production team that can confirm that this is the word used. We do not use lip-reading, and other speculation in an animation. --[[User:TheDJ|TheDJ]] ([[User talk:TheDJ|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/TheDJ|contribs]] • [[WP:TV|WikiProject Television]]) 20:41, 5 May 2007 (UTC)	+	* [[Wikipedia:Image use policy]]
-	:Check your talk page, there's a difference between TV-Tome and tv.com. - [[User:Super48|Super48]] 20:42, 5 May 2007 (UTC)	+	* [[Wikipedia:Image copyright tags]]
-	==[[Template:Guideline]]==	+	This is an automated notice by [[User:OrphanBot|OrphanBot]]. For assistance on the image use policy, see [[Wikipedia:Media copyright questions]]. 06:39, 24 March 2007 (UTC)
-	What, other than breaking the transparency in IE6, do you seek to accomplish by switching from the custom-tweaked PNG to an SVG that gets converted to an inferior PNG for display?  —[[User:David Levy|David Levy]] 21:24, 5 May 2007 (UTC)	+
-	:It doesn't break the transparency in my IE6. - [[User:Super48|Super48]] 21:25, 5 May 2007 (UTC)	+	==Your user page==
		+	Your user page says "This user is a sockpuppet of Allah". What is that supposed to mean?[[User:Bless sins|Bless sins]] 06:24, 25 March 2007 (UTC)
		+	:So you are pretending to imitate Allah? I didn't quite understand your response fully. The reason I was asking you is out of curiosity as to why you would use Allah in the context of term used negatively on wikipedia.[[User:Bless sins|Bless sins]] 16:34, 25 March 2007 (UTC)
		+	::DavidYork71, I ''strongly suggest'' that you not replace the userbox in question, which I've just removed. Generally, userboxes are of ''no value whatsoever.'' They have nothing to do with building an encyclopedia, and if they cause even one mote of trouble, they should go. Let us now move on and find something more meaningful to discuss.[[User:Proabivouac|Proabivouac]] 22:53, 25 March 2007 (UTC)
-	::Look again.  The background is white instead of grey.  And again, what do you believe that we stand to gain via this change? —[[User:David Levy|David Levy]] 21:28, 5 May 2007 (UTC)	+	==User:BongHitz4Musa?==
-	:::It's not in my IE6. Also, another thing is that [[WP:USOP|SVG should be used over PNG]]. - [[User:Super48|Super48]] 21:30, 5 May 2007 (UTC)	+	==Thanks==
		+	I really appreciate, [[User:Nayan Nev|NN]] 03:09, 26 March 2007 (UTC)
-	:::In my IE6, the background ''is'' transparent. [http://tinypic.com/view.php?pic=4yq9gxv Here] is proof; open an image editing program, zoom in on the image, and you will see the background is transparent. - [[User:Super48|Super48]] 21:45, 5 May 2007 (UTC)	+	== Graph on your user talk page ==
		+	As per [[WP:USER]] the graph at the top of this page is violation of [[WP:NPA]] and [[WP:NPOV]]. Please remove it. [[User:Gnangarra|Gnan]][[User_talk:Gnangarra|garra]] 03:19, 26 March 2007 (UTC)
		+	:No.[[User:DavidYork71|DavidYork71]] 06:23, 1 April 2007 (UTC)
		+	::You already did. [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:DavidYork71&diff=next&oldid=118392156] Why would you then say 'no' to such a request? [[User:Merbabu|Merbabu]] 08:02, 1 April 2007 (UTC)
-	::::1. Are you certain that you're using IE6?  What is the full version number?	+	== your edit on Islam Children ==
-	::::2. SVGs have advantages over PNGs, but none of them apply to this particular situation.	+	What do u mean by this: Remove hadith quoted as original research (no secondary sourcing apparent)
-	::::MediaWiki (the software on which this wiki is based) does ''not'' display SVGs.  An image stored in this format is converted to a 24-bit PNG (exactly the same format as the image that you've removed) before it appears on-screen.  IE6 (at least, every version with which I'm familiar) is incapable of displaying 24-bit PNG transparencies, but it ''does'' use the file's bKGD attribute (if one is specified). MediaWiki automatically inserts a bKGD attribute of 255,255,255 (white), so that's the background color that the image assumes in IE6. The custom-tweaked PNG file contains a bKGD attribute of 249,249,249 (the shade of grey used in the template). Therefore, it appears correctly in IE6.  Otherwise, it's identical to the PNG generated from the SVG by MediaWiki (except for the shade of blue). I should know, given the fact that I uploaded both the PNG and the SVG.	+	A hadith is an adequate reference...and Muslims are bound by it to follow. Additionally you have introduced a NOR tag so that I could have added additional ref.
-	::::In other words, your edit accomplishes nothing other than changing the shade of blue and breaking the transparency in IE6.  Even if this problem doesn't affect you, it certainly affects many other people.  Please revert to the PNG.  —[[User:David Levy|David Levy]] 21:53, 5 May 2007 (UTC)	+
-	== Unblock ==	+	[[User:Smus|Smus]] 06:31, 26 March 2007 (UTC)
		+	==Wikipedia is collaborative==
		+	please wait for sometime before merging. --[[User:Aminz|Aminz]] 09:59, 26 March 2007 (UTC)
		+	:YEs, please do not move pages unilaterally. Furthermore, it seems you have done this by copy and pasting. This is a big wikipedia no-no as you've managed to lose both the discussion for each topic (it could be suggested you wanted this) and you have also removed the page history. I will be asking an admin to revert the changes until such time as there is consensus on any move, and the more important problem of lost history. Please learn to be more collaborative in your approaches and be careful of ownership issues.  thanks. --[[User:Merbabu|Merbabu]] 12:49, 26 March 2007 (UTC)
		+	::I have repaired the damage you did to the article histories with your copy-paste move. I've already mentioned this problem to you ages ago.[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3ADavidYork71&diff=112302577&oldid=112293478] I, like everyone, don't particularly like having to clean up someone else's mess because they chose to ignore me. Please learn to use the "move" tab if you're going to move pages around. [[User talk:Hesperian|Hesperian]] 13:01, 26 March 2007 (UTC)
-	{{unblock reviewed|1=I'm not sockpuppet, you should read the above, I'm 98E's borther. - Super48 21:12, 6 May 2007 (UTC)|decline=Sorry, I'm not buying it.  This account was set up very shortly after 98E was blocked indefinitely and has edited a similar set of articles.  — [[User:Yamla|Yamla]] 21:43, 6 May 2007 (UTC)}}	+	== Autosodomy ==
-	== Indef blocked ==	+	A tag has been placed on [[:Autosodomy]], requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a {{#if:{{{2|}}}|discussion at [[:{{{2}}}]]|[[Wikipedia:Deletion debates|deletion debate]], such as [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion|articles for deletion]]}}. If you can indicate how Autosodomy is different from the previously posted material, or if you can indicate why this article should not be deleted, I advise you to place the template {{tl|hangon}} '''underneath''' the other template on the article, and also put a note on [[Talk:Autosodomy]] saying why this article should stay. An admin should check for such edits before deleting the article. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Please read our [[Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion|criteria for speedy deletion]], particularly item 4 under General criteria. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. We welcome your help in trying to improve Wikipedia, and we request you to follow these instructions.{{{3|}}} <!-- Template: Uw-repost --> ''--[[User:DeLarge|DeLarge]] 13:40, 26 March 2007 (UTC)''
-	This account has been blocked as it is being used by 98E to avoid his indefinite block. [[User:Picaroon9288|Picaroon]] [[User talk:Picaroon9288|(Talk)]] 21:13, 6 May 2007 (UTC)	+
-	:No it isn't, read the aobve. The only thing I have to with 98E is the fact that I'm his brother. - [[User:Super48|Super48]] 21:13, 6 May 2007 (UTC)	+
-	== Huh? ==	+	==Islam and children==
-	Why is my request being ignored? If you read the above, you would know that I'm not a sockpuppet. - [[User:Super48|Super48]] 21:18, 6 May 2007 (UTC)	+	Please provide explanations for you edits, particularly major changes to contentious topics - ie, anything involving Islam. For example, there is no explanation for this change [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Islam_and_children&diff=117984953&oldid=117981603]. [[User:Merbabu|Merbabu]] 13:46, 26 March 2007 (UTC)
-	:Be patient, it takes time. --[[User:24.136.230.38|24.136.230.38]] 21:41, 6 May 2007 (UTC)	+	:It's all explained, all justified, by its sourcing to which yourself and all editors and readers are invited to consult.[[User:DavidYork71|DavidYork71]] 22:22, 27 March 2007 (UTC)
-	== Please... ==	+	== Islam template ==
-	{{unblock reviewed|I can explain this. The fact that we made similar contrib's is because we like the same things. It runs in the family. For example, since I like [[South Park]], my kids probably will too. And the fact that I registered shortly after 98E's block is just a coincidence. And have I vandalized at all? No. I'm a good Wikipedian, I promise that I'm not 98E. If I were 98E, I'd probably be raging about this block. But I'm remaining calm. Though 98E continued to abuse {{tl|unblock}}, I'm not gonna abuse it since I've explained this all. I am hoping you will unblock me now that you know the truth. - [[User:Super48|Super48]] 21:30, 7 May 2007 (UTC)|decline=Nup, like Yamla, not buying it. The timing of this account creation gives me sufficient inclination to believe that I can't assume good faith in this situation. Register an email address in special preferences ([[WP:EMAIL]]), and contact the blocking administrator, because they made the initial call, to which I (and Yamla, above) believe was appropriate within administrator discretion. '''[[User:Daniel.Bryant|<span style="color:#2E82F4">Daniel&nbsp;Bryant</span>]]''' 12:36, 9 May 2007 (UTC)}}	+	Sorry, I've reverted your addition to the Islam template. There has been a long discussion about what to add and what not to, and [[Islam and animals]] doesn't seem to be relevant enough. If you want you can discuss at the template talk page. [[User:Feer|Feer]] 13:49, 26 March 2007 (UTC)
-	:E-mail the blocking administrator. --[[User:Deskana|Deskana]] [[User talk:Deskana|<small>(AFK 47)</small>]] 19:29, 8 May 2007 (UTC)	+
-	::I don't have an e-mail address. The {{tl|unblock}} template is my only hope. I don't see why (and this is just a comment, not a threat) you didn't answer my request, seeing as you're an admin. However, you guys can take your time, I have all the time in the world, and I'm sure you admins must be very busy. - [[User:Super48|Super48]] 21:07, 8 May 2007 (UTC)	+
-	:::Regarding your comment about me answering the request: I did, my answer was e-mail the blocking admin. Typically the blocking administrator is consulted before unblocks are carried out unless it's something like an [[Wikipedia:Autoblocks|autoblock]] that is straight forward. I'm somewhat puzzled as to why you can't register an e-mail account. I myself have like twenty. There are plenty of free providers: hotmail.com for instace. However, I will contact the blocking administrator for you to explain himself here. --[[User:Deskana|Deskana]] [[User talk:Deskana|<small>(AFK 47)</small>]] 23:58, 8 May 2007 (UTC)	+
-	::::Oh, okay, thanks. I'm sure s/he'll understand. - [[User:Super48|Super48]] 00:44, 9 May 2007 (UTC)	+
-	== E-mail ==	+
-	Where can I findt the page to e-mail a user? - [[User:Super48|Super48]] 21:30, 9 May 2007 (UTC)}}	+
-	:which user are you looking to email? [[User:drunkenmonkey|Andy]]<sup>[[User talk:Thatguy69|''talk'']]</sup> 21:34, 9 May 2007 (UTC)	+
-	::Nvm, I did it already. - [[User:Super48|Super48]] 21:39, 9 May 2007 (UTC)	+
-	:::I don't see what you want to email you about. You were recognized as a sockpuppet based on your behavior alone. I was merely fulfilling my duties as a sysop by blocking you. Then, a checkuser request confirmed it that you were a sock, and your IP was blocked to put an end to it. There is nothing more to say. [[User:Picaroon9288|Picaroon]] [[User talk:Picaroon9288|(Talk)]] 02:33, 10 May 2007 (UTC)	+
-	::::Yes there is. I'm not a sock and you know it. Trying to deny that I'm 98E's brother is only abusing your sysop privileges. Please unblock because you're wrong that I'm a sock. - [[User:Super48|Super48]] 21:15, 10 May 2007 (UTC)	+
-	== [[:Image:Eric.svg]] ==	+	== Test ==
-	Hello, Super48. An automated process has found and removed an image or media file tagged as nonfree media, and thus is being used under [[Wikipedia:fair use|fair use]] that was in your userspace. The image ([[:Image:Eric.svg]]) was found at the following location: [[User:Super48/Sandbox]]. This image or media was attempted to be removed per criterion number 9 of our [[Wikipedia:Non-free_content#Policy|non-free content policy]]. The image or media was replaced with [[:Image:NonFreeImageRemoved.svg]] , so your formatting of your userpage should be fine. Please find a free image or    media to replace it with, and or remove the image from your userspace. [[User:Gnome (Bot)]][[User talk:Gnome (Bot)|-talk]] 02:22, 16 May 2007 (UTC)	+
-	{{unblock reviewed|I have told you admins quite clearly that I'm just 98E's brother, and that I made similar contrib's because I like similar things. Please unblock because otherwise you're abusing sysop privileges. - [[User:Super48|Super48]] 21:42, 16 May 2007 (UTC)|decline=Putting this as delicately as possible, a lot of people have claimed to be brothers, or claim to have had their brothers abuse their accounts, and other such tales about roommates, teachers, classmates, parents, friends, or even pets. Nine times out of ten, these stories are fabricated. Evidence currently is that you're using the same IP address and exhibiting the same behavior as a recently blocked user. Simple application of the [[duck test]]. It's not perfect, but this isn't a court of law, either -- we're not saying you're guilty, innocent, or whatever, only that we're very concerned by circumstances, and that we're not necessarily willing to take a leap of faith based on your word alone. Sorry. &ndash; <span style="font-family: Garamond">[[User:Luna Santin|<font color="#1E90FF">'''Luna Santin'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Luna Santin|talk]])</span> 21:54, 16 May 2007 (UTC)}}	+	Thank you for experimenting with {{#if:Chia Thye Poh|the page [[:Chia Thye Poh]] on}} Wikipedia{{#if:{{{diff|}}}|&nbsp;as you did with [{{{diff}}} this edit]}}. Your test worked, and it has been [[Help:Reverting|reverted]] or removed. Please use [[Wikipedia:Sandbox|the sandbox]] for any other tests you may want to do. Take a look at the [[Wikipedia:Introduction|welcome page]] to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.<!-- Template:Test (first level warning) --> --[[User:Vsion|Vsion]] 19:38, 27 March 2007 (UTC)
-	{{unblock reviewed|1=Please... I'm ruined if I'm blocked, when I registered, Wikipedia became my life, and now you're ruining it by blocking me... please... unblock... I... don't.. . think... I'll... make... it... much... longer... - Super48 21:56, 16 May 2007 (UTC)|decline=Wikipedia became your life for those whole two days you were editing? I think not. Denied. — <font color="Green">[[User:Irishguy|'''IrishGuy''']]</font> <sup><font color="Blue">[[User talk:Irishguy|''talk'']]</font></sup> 22:19, 16 May 2007 (UTC)}}	+
-	{{unblock reviewed|1=Well, it is because of how good Wiki is. But if you refuse to unblock me, you are denying that I am a legitimate editor. - Super48 22:21, 16 May 2007 (UTC)|decline=You have had four admins decide not to unblock you. Stop abusing the unblock template or I will protect this talk page. — <font color="Green">[[User:Irishguy|'''IrishGuy''']]</font> <sup><font color="Blue">[[User talk:Irishguy|''talk'']]</font></sup> 22:25, 16 May 2007 (UTC)}}	+
-	:Fine. Deny the truth if you wanna be an asshole, you son of a bitch. Fuck you. - [[User:Super48|Super48]] 22:26, 16 May 2007 (UTC)	+
-	::That is certainly pleasant. Being [[WP:CIV|uncivil]] isn't going to get anyone to unblock you. <font color="Green">[[User:Irishguy|'''IrishGuy''']]</font> <sup><font color="Blue">[[User talk:Irishguy|''talk'']]</font></sup> 22:43, 16 May 2007 (UTC)	+
-	:::I've protected this talk page for one week, since this conversation didn't seem to be going anywhere. Your available appeal options are limited to emailing administrators, contacting [[WP:ML|unblock-en-l]], and waiting for protection to expire. &ndash; <span style="font-family: Garamond">[[User:Luna Santin|<font color="#1E90FF">'''Luna Santin'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Luna Santin|talk]])</span> 22:45, 16 May 2007 (UTC)	+
-	== Denying the truth ==	+	==I and animals==
-	I simply have no clue why you're denying the truth by calling me a sockpuppet. Such lying is only going to turn this into a flame war. I've emailed the blocking admin, but do I get a reply? No. That pretty much ticks me off. If the blocking admin is seeing this: Get a god damn life other then framing people for misunderstandings! - [[User:Super48|Super48]] 23:47, 24 May 2007 (UTC)	+	Nice additions there. [[User:Arrow740|Arrow740]] 23:45, 27 March 2007 (UTC)
		+
		+	==Goodbye and Good Luck==
		+	[[User:SatuSuro|Satu]][[User talk:SatuSuro|Suro]] 10:11, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
		+	:Thanks. I hope to add up on [[Mike Gravel presidential campaign, 2008]] if anything notable happens for him.[[User:DavidYork71|DavidYork71]] 10:37, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
		+	:Someone else who was leaving said 'have fun bickering'. It's a snarky thing to say. There's fun to be had ''reading'' the bickering at [[Islam and slavery]][[User:DavidYork71|DavidYork71]] 10:42, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
		+
		+	==== Intimate sexual activity with child spouses (Shia View) ====
		+	The [[Khomeini|Grand Ayatollah Seyyed Ruhollah Mosavi Khomeini]], who represents [[Shi'a|Shi'a Islam]], has defined the following limits and consequences for adult sexual activity with children relevant to Islam:
		+	<blockquote>"A man can marry a girl younger than nine years of age, even if the girl is still a baby being breastfed. A man, however is prohibited from having intercourse with a girl younger than nine, other sexual acts such as foreplay, rubbing, and kissing allowed. A man having intercourse with a girl younger than nine years of age has not committed a crime, but only an infraction, if the girl is not permanently damaged. If the girl, however, is permanently damaged, the man must provide for her all her life. But this girl will not count as one of the man's four permanent wives. He also is not permitted to marry the girl's sister."<ref>Ayatollah Khomeini in Tahrirolvasyleh, Fourth Edition, Darol Elm, Qom</ref><ref>http://www.homa.org/Details.asp?ContentID=2137352748</ref><ref>http://www.al-shia.com/html/ara/books/tahrir/tahrir25.htm#a4 Original(in Arabic)</ref></blockquote>
		+
		+	==[[:Autosodomy]]==
		+	Another editor has added the "{{tl|prod}}" template to the article [[Autosodomy]], suggesting that it be deleted according to the [[Wikipedia:Proposed deletion|proposed deletion]] process. All contributions are appreciated, but the editor doesn't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and has explained why in the article (see also [[Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not]] and [[Wikipedia:Notability]]). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia or discuss the relevant issues at [[Talk:Autosodomy|its talk page]]. If you remove the {{tl|prod}} template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion]], where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. [[User:Oo7565|Oo7565]] 05:29, 30 March 2007 (UTC)
		+
		+	==Edit conflicts==
		+	Please send me an e-mail when you're done at I and S so I can do some editing. [[User:Arrow740|Arrow740]] 04:49, 31 March 2007 (UTC)
		+	:Thanks. I also included something in the e-mail that might help you. [[User:Arrow740|Arrow740]] 04:54, 31 March 2007 (UTC)
		+
		+	== March 2007 ==
		+
		+	{{{icon|[[Image:Information.svg|25px|left]] }}}Please do not add unhelpful and unconstructive information to Wikipedia{{{{{subst|}}}#if:Yoga|, as you did to [[:Yoga]]}}. Your edits appear to be [[Wikipedia:Vandalism|vandalism]] and have been [[Help:Reverting|reverted]]. If you would like to experiment, please use the [[Wikipedia:Sandbox|sandbox]]. {{{2|Thank you.}}}<!-- {{uw-vandalism2}} --> [[User:Buddhipriya|Buddhipriya]] 06:12, 31 March 2007 (UTC)
		+
		+	==[[WP:TPG]]==
		+	Your solicitation for GA review of [[Islam and slavery]] on unrelated articles is disruptive. Cease this at once. {{User:Netscott/s1.js}} 08:06, 31 March 2007 (UTC)
		+	:No.[[User:DavidYork71|DavidYork71]] 08:11, 31 March 2007 (UTC)
		+
		+	==CANVASSING==
		+	Please stop solicitating [[Islam and slavery]] in unrelated articles on Wikipedia. They are considered  [[WP:CANVASS|canvassing]] and are unacceptable within Wikipedia. This is your '''last warning'''. Any more canvassing will result in a [[WP:BLOCK|block]]. --[[User:Kzrulzuall|<font color="darkblue" face="Harlow Solid Italic">'''''KZ'''''</font>]][[User talk:Kzrulzuall|<sup><small><font color= "green">''' Talk '''</font></small></sup>]] <sup>•</sup> [[Special:Contributions/Kzrulzuall|<sup><small>Contribs</small></sup>]] 09:21, 31 March 2007 (UTC)
		+
		+	== Islam and Slavery GA ==
		+
		+	I have reviewed it and granted GA once before it was badly edited with a lot of POV statements and edit warring. I don't review the same article twice. &mdash; [[User:Indon|Indon]] ([[User_talk:Indon |<font color="green">reply</font>]]) &mdash; 10:24, 31 March 2007 (UTC)
		+	::[[WP:Civility]]. [[WP:Good faith]] and [[WP:Wikiquette]] restrain any response whatsoever from me :) [[User:SatuSuro|Satu]][[User talk:SatuSuro|Suro]] 10:49, 31 March 2007 (UTC)
		+
		+
		+
		+	== Block ==
		+
		+	<div style="padding:5px; border:1px solid #c0c090; background-color:#FEC;" class="user-block"> [[Image:Stop_hand.svg|30px|left]]  You have been [[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|blocked]] from editing for {{{{{subst|}}}#if:24 hours|a period of '''24 hours'''|a short time}} in accordance with [[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|Wikipedia's blocking policy]] for {{{{{subst|}}}#if:canvassing despite repeated warnings (see above)|'''canvassing despite repeated warnings (see above)'''|repeated [[Wikipedia:Vandalism|abuse of editing privileges]]}}. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions.  If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text . {{{{{subst|}}}#if:{{{sig|}}}|[[User talk:Orderinchaos|Orderinchaos]] 11:15, 31 March 2007 (UTC)}}</div><!-- {{uw-block1}} --> [[User talk:Orderinchaos|Orderinchaos]] 11:15, 31 March 2007 (UTC)
		+
		+	{{unblock reviewed|1=any canvassing for GA editors after complaints about disruption on article talk pages were addressed to user talk pages and as such may not fairly be characterised as disruptive to article editorship|decline=As per Netscott's comments below. — [[User:Yamla|Yamla]] 14:27, 31 March 2007 (UTC)}}
		+
		+	:You were engaging in [[quid pro quo]] GA reviewing and canvassing towards those ends. Your actions were an attempt to game the GA system. As well you knowingly avoided your block with an IP as [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Islam_and_slavery&diff=119263398&oldid=119262423 this revert] demonstrates. Very disruptive. {{User:Netscott/s1.js}} 14:20, 31 March 2007 (UTC)
		+
		+	{{unblock reviewed|1=I see a 24hr blocking on my talkpage which I believe would have expired by now. On block log I see a 48hr for 'sockpuppetry'. Looking at [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/DavidYork71|decline=Ban was extended 48 after you used a series of sockpuppets to avoid the original ban, I see no reason to unblock at this stage — [[User:Gnangarra|Gnan]][[User_talk:Gnangarra|garra]] 10:35, 1 April 2007 (UTC)}} [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Log&type=block&page=User:DavidYork71 dif]
		+
		+	full unblock reasons summary:'''I see a 24hr blocking on my talkpage which I believe would have expired by now. On block log I see a 48hr for 'sockpuppetry'. Looking at [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/DavidYork71|my contributions] I see I've only updated my own talk page since 10:41, 31 March 2007. Surveying the WP Blocking policy I see mentions of bans ''up to'' 24 hours, ... and indefinite bans for the most offensive behaviour. So please determine when the 24 hours has started and when its ended. Sanity-checking from someone other than the original block-imposer is requested. The original ban was for soliciting for a GA-reviewer on non-contributing user talk pages. Oh my'''
		+
		+	== Another offence ==
		+	Adding "autosodomy" [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Yoga&diff=119215941&oldid=119077364] to the list of yoga practices was also pretty disruptive but as I find you've already been blocked I'll just leave as a blot on your track record. --[[User:BozMo|BozMo]] [[user talk:BozMo|talk]] 16:39, 31 March 2007 (UTC)
		+	:Yoga is inclusive of all static exercise involving only the body. Autosodomy yoga is within that and autosodomy is itself a yogic exercise. Numerous yoga stances may be maintained in positions where full or partial autosodomy is also attained. And yogic disciplines may assist in attaining autosodomy (for the few and the brave).[[User:DavidYork71|DavidYork71]] 16:51, 31 March 2007 (UTC)
		+
		+	::Please do not place pornographic content on the yoga page.  There is absolutely no reference to this practice in any established form of yoga that I know of.  Addition of pornographic content without any form of citation of [[WP:RS]] is disruptive behavior. [[User:Buddhipriya|Buddhipriya]] 18:16, 1 April 2007 (UTC)
		+
		+	==in case you didn't know==
		+	If you deside to take a break from editing wikipedia again, you can just tag your page with {{tl|wikibreak}} instead of giving an explanation at the top of your talk page. See [[Wikipedia:Wikibreak]] for futher information.--[[User:Sefringle|Sefringle]] 23:30, 31 March 2007 (UTC)
		+
		+	==Copyright release request to al@solosuck.com==
		+	Dear Mr Al Eingang,
		+
		+	this request relates to the attached image for which you are the copyright owner. Would you be willing to release copyright in the image for the purpose of its appearance in the online wikipedia (www.wikipedia.org)?  Alternatively, could you provide other free images for this purpose? It is proposed for the image to feature on the 'Autosodomy' article page or the autosodomy subsection of the 'sodomy' article.
		+
		+	The image will appear with such attribution and commentary as you may helpfully provide eg. information about its source.
		+
		+	Any other information about autosodomy culture and practice (attributable to a reliable source for encyclopaedic content purposes)  that you may be able to refer me to would also be useful for inclusion in the article.
		+
		+	Yours Sincerely,
		+	etc.[[User:DavidYork71|DavidYork71]] 06:14, 1 April 2007 (UTC)
		+
		+	== Response ==
		+
		+	Very quick one - firstly, the alleged sockpuppet edits would not be caught by the above link, they only catch edits by this nick, so it's a straw man argument. Secondly, I acted on behalf of community consensus in both of the actions taken and both the discussion leading to my decision, and the results can be found at WP:AN/I. I was in a position to act as I have no connection or history with the page or its subject matter, so could address the actions on their own in accordance with policy. WP:BLOCK clearly indicates a gradually increasing scale of penalties, and I chose the two bottom ones. The appropriate section reads: "Static IPs and logged-in users: start at 24 hours, increase gradually if it starts again." As this relates to a named user, this section and not the one related to dynamic IPs applies. [[User talk:Orderinchaos|Orderinchaos]] 14:34, 1 April 2007 (UTC)
		+
		+	== Inclusion of pornography in articles ==
		+
		+	Please read [[Wikipedia:Pornography]] before adding further pornography to articles.  The picture in question was apparently taken from a porn site, not a yoga institute, and there is no documentation per [[WP:RS]] that the performance of the act has anything to do with yoga or that the performer was a "yogi". [[User:Buddhipriya|Buddhipriya]] 17:04, 3 April 2007 (UTC)
		+	::It has everything to do with yoga. See [[Sodomy#Yoga]]. It is a yogic discipline, an expression of sexuality, and best described as both at the same time. <small>—The preceding [[Wikipedia:Sign your posts on talk pages|unsigned]] comment was added by [[Special:Contributions/149.135.101.74|149.135.101.74]] ([[User talk:149.135.101.74|talk]]) 13:07, 4 April 2007 (UTC).</small><!-- HagermanBot Auto-Unsigned -->
		+
		+	==DOn't remove block warnings==
		+	{{{icon|[[Image:Information.svg|25px|left]] }}}Please do not [[Wikipedia:Talk page guidelines#Behavior that is unacceptable|delete or edit]] legitimate talk page comments{{{{{subst|}}}#if:{{{1|}}}|, as you did at [[:{{{1}}}]]}}; this is considered [[Wikipedia:Vandalism|vandalism]]. If you would like to experiment, please use the [[Wikipedia:Sandbox|sandbox]]. {{{2|Thank you.}}}<!-- {{uw-tpv2}}-->
		+
		+	:You removed records of your blocks from here [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:DavidYork71&diff=prev&oldid=119992801] and here [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:DavidYork71&diff=next&oldid=119992801]. You've actually been told about this before      You've also removed your archives. Don't worry, I've replaced them all for you now [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3ADavidYork71&diff=120212519&oldid=120011947] and [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3ADavidYork71&diff=120212825&oldid=120212519] --[[User:Merbabu|Merbabu]] 12:37, 4 April 2007 (UTC)

---

Revision as of 12:37, 18 July 2008

Contents 1 Murray & Hernstein 2 I and S 3 Another Arabic-English verification issue 4 Image tagging 5 My comments 6 Image tagging for Image:Arabslaverwomen.jpg 7 Your user page 8 User:BongHitz4Musa? 9 Thanks 10 Graph on your user talk page 11 your edit on Islam Children 12 Wikipedia is collaborative 13 Autosodomy 14 Islam and children 15 Islam template 16 Test 17 I and animals 18 Goodbye and Good Luck 18.1 Intimate sexual activity with child spouses (Shia View) 19 Autosodomy 20 Edit conflicts 21 March 2007 22 WP:TPG 23 CANVASSING 24 Islam and Slavery GA 25 Block 26 Another offence 27 in case you didn't know 28 Copyright release request to al@solosuck.com 29 Response 30 Inclusion of pornography in articles 31 DOn't remove block warnings

Murray & Hernstein

DavidYork71, I will not disagree that Murray & Hernstein's work constitutes valid, if imperfect, sociological science. However, the associated graph is obviously quite controversial. Mainspace isn't censored, but there is really no reason to host it in userspace, where it will inform hardly anyone, and may be used against you. Proabivouac 06:42, 22 March 2007 (UTC)

I dont' understand what it is trying to say - or what David is trying to say by using it. Merbabu 13:13, 22 March 2007 (UTC)

Apologies, I suppose it does not come from M&H after all. David, I presume nothing in particular about what you are trying to say; I am only offering friendly advice, which you are free to ignore.Proabivouac 14:35, 22 March 2007 (UTC)

The story is I was trawling throught NPOV disputes trying to eliminate a few where articles had been reactively tagged without describing points of variance or reasons on talk, which I see quite a lot. I learned that not just articles, but also maps, graphs and even pictures got the treatment. This graph was one of them. It sits here in honour of all those - we all know the type - who will reactively tag information of all kinds because they don't like the truths it may reveal about a subject.DavidYork71 09:16, 23 March 2007 (UTC)

I and S

I gave my reasons on the talk for that edit. Please revert yourself. Arrow740 09:42, 23 March 2007 (UTC)

Thanks. Arrow740 09:54, 23 March 2007 (UTC)

"However, despite abolitionist views sourced from some influential scholars of Islam." There aren't any. You are overreacting here. Please don't edit the intro, it's a concensus version produced by a neutral editor. Arrow740 09:53, 23 March 2007 (UTC)

Three reverts every twenty-four hours is not an entitlement. It is better to avoid undoing another person's work if possible. Try to integrate what you want to say with what others want to say, and take it slowly. After all, no one who is blocked is able to contribute to the article. Tom Harrison ^Talk 13:54, 23 March 2007 (UTC)

I understand your point, but there is no exception to 3rr that alows you to revert factually incorrect material. Tom Harrison ^Talk 14:05, 23 March 2007 (UTC)

On that page I have only that one reversion in 24 hours and I've self-reverted myself twice upon request from ArrowDavidYork71 14:11, 23 March 2007 (UTC)

Another Arabic-English verification issue

Hi David. Could you please give me some time to look at your request? Probably, i can do that this week-end. I am a bit busy w/ the military wikiproject for now. Cheers. -- FayssalF - ^{Wiki me up ®} 15:35, 23 March 2007 (UTC)

OK. I'm very interested to know more about Muhammad's slaves. Who they were, what he used them for, why they were slaves, and just generally what we can be most sure about on this subject so many centuries later.DavidYork71 00:12, 26 March 2007 (UTC)

Image tagging

David York, you've got a number of images tagged with the {{attribution}} tag like this one and yet you've not provided any sort of proof of this. Would you kindly review the images you have uploaded and correct this? Information on image licensing is an important necessity when Wikipedia uses such content. User:Netscott/s1.js 15:35, 23 March 2007 (UTC)

My comments

Please do not break my comments. --Aminz 21:57, 23 March 2007 (UTC)

Image tagging for Image:Arabslaverwomen.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Arabslaverwomen.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 06:39, 24 March 2007 (UTC)

Your user page

Your user page says "This user is a sockpuppet of Allah". What is that supposed to mean?Bless sins 06:24, 25 March 2007 (UTC)

So you are pretending to imitate Allah? I didn't quite understand your response fully. The reason I was asking you is out of curiosity as to why you would use Allah in the context of term used negatively on wikipedia.Bless sins 16:34, 25 March 2007 (UTC)

DavidYork71, I strongly suggest that you not replace the userbox in question, which I've just removed. Generally, userboxes are of no value whatsoever. They have nothing to do with building an encyclopedia, and if they cause even one mote of trouble, they should go. Let us now move on and find something more meaningful to discuss.Proabivouac 22:53, 25 March 2007 (UTC)

User:BongHitz4Musa?

Thanks

I really appreciate, NN 03:09, 26 March 2007 (UTC)

Graph on your user talk page

As per WP:USER the graph at the top of this page is violation of WP:NPA and WP:NPOV. Please remove it. Gnangarra 03:19, 26 March 2007 (UTC)

No.DavidYork71 06:23, 1 April 2007 (UTC)

You already did. [1] Why would you then say 'no' to such a request? Merbabu 08:02, 1 April 2007 (UTC)

your edit on Islam Children

What do u mean by this: Remove hadith quoted as original research (no secondary sourcing apparent) A hadith is an adequate reference...and Muslims are bound by it to follow. Additionally you have introduced a NOR tag so that I could have added additional ref.

Smus 06:31, 26 March 2007 (UTC)

Wikipedia is collaborative

please wait for sometime before merging. --Aminz 09:59, 26 March 2007 (UTC)

YEs, please do not move pages unilaterally. Furthermore, it seems you have done this by copy and pasting. This is a big wikipedia no-no as you've managed to lose both the discussion for each topic (it could be suggested you wanted this) and you have also removed the page history. I will be asking an admin to revert the changes until such time as there is consensus on any move, and the more important problem of lost history. Please learn to be more collaborative in your approaches and be careful of ownership issues. thanks. --Merbabu 12:49, 26 March 2007 (UTC)

I have repaired the damage you did to the article histories with your copy-paste move. I've already mentioned this problem to you ages ago.[2] I, like everyone, don't particularly like having to clean up someone else's mess because they chose to ignore me. Please learn to use the "move" tab if you're going to move pages around. Hesperian 13:01, 26 March 2007 (UTC)

Autosodomy

A tag has been placed on Autosodomy, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as articles for deletion. If you can indicate how Autosodomy is different from the previously posted material, or if you can indicate why this article should not be deleted, I advise you to place the template {{hangon}} underneath the other template on the article, and also put a note on Talk:Autosodomy saying why this article should stay. An admin should check for such edits before deleting the article. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Please read our criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 4 under General criteria. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. We welcome your help in trying to improve Wikipedia, and we request you to follow these instructions. --DeLarge 13:40, 26 March 2007 (UTC)

Islam and children

Please provide explanations for you edits, particularly major changes to contentious topics - ie, anything involving Islam. For example, there is no explanation for this change [3]. Merbabu 13:46, 26 March 2007 (UTC)

It's all explained, all justified, by its sourcing to which yourself and all editors and readers are invited to consult.DavidYork71 22:22, 27 March 2007 (UTC)

Islam template

Sorry, I've reverted your addition to the Islam template. There has been a long discussion about what to add and what not to, and Islam and animals doesn't seem to be relevant enough. If you want you can discuss at the template talk page. Feer 13:49, 26 March 2007 (UTC)

Test

Thank you for experimenting with the page Chia Thye Poh on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you may want to do. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. --Vsion 19:38, 27 March 2007 (UTC)

I and animals

Nice additions there. Arrow740 23:45, 27 March 2007 (UTC)

Goodbye and Good Luck

SatuSuro 10:11, 28 March 2007 (UTC)

Thanks. I hope to add up on Mike Gravel presidential campaign, 2008 if anything notable happens for him.DavidYork71 10:37, 28 March 2007 (UTC)

Someone else who was leaving said 'have fun bickering'. It's a snarky thing to say. There's fun to be had reading the bickering at Islam and slaveryDavidYork71 10:42, 28 March 2007 (UTC)

Intimate sexual activity with child spouses (Shia View)

The Grand Ayatollah Seyyed Ruhollah Mosavi Khomeini, who represents Shi'a Islam, has defined the following limits and consequences for adult sexual activity with children relevant to Islam:

"A man can marry a girl younger than nine years of age, even if the girl is still a baby being breastfed. A man, however is prohibited from having intercourse with a girl younger than nine, other sexual acts such as foreplay, rubbing, and kissing allowed. A man having intercourse with a girl younger than nine years of age has not committed a crime, but only an infraction, if the girl is not permanently damaged. If the girl, however, is permanently damaged, the man must provide for her all her life. But this girl will not count as one of the man's four permanent wives. He also is not permitted to marry the girl's sister."<ref>Ayatollah Khomeini in Tahrirolvasyleh, Fourth Edition, Darol Elm, Qom</ref><ref>http://www.homa.org/Details.asp?ContentID=2137352748</ref><ref>http://www.al-shia.com/html/ara/books/tahrir/tahrir25.htm#a4 Original(in Arabic)</ref>

Autosodomy

Another editor has added the "{{prod}}" template to the article Autosodomy, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but the editor doesn't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and has explained why in the article (see also Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not and Wikipedia:Notability). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia or discuss the relevant issues at its talk page. If you remove the {{prod}} template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Oo7565 05:29, 30 March 2007 (UTC)

Edit conflicts

Please send me an e-mail when you're done at I and S so I can do some editing. Arrow740 04:49, 31 March 2007 (UTC)

Thanks. I also included something in the e-mail that might help you. Arrow740 04:54, 31 March 2007 (UTC)

March 2007

Please do not add unhelpful and unconstructive information to Wikipedia, as you did to Yoga. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Buddhipriya 06:12, 31 March 2007 (UTC)

WP:TPG

Your solicitation for GA review of Islam and slavery on unrelated articles is disruptive. Cease this at once. User:Netscott/s1.js 08:06, 31 March 2007 (UTC)

No.DavidYork71 08:11, 31 March 2007 (UTC)

CANVASSING

Please stop solicitating Islam and slavery in unrelated articles on Wikipedia. They are considered canvassing and are unacceptable within Wikipedia. This is your last warning. Any more canvassing will result in a block. --KZ ^{Talk • Contribs} 09:21, 31 March 2007 (UTC)

Islam and Slavery GA

I have reviewed it and granted GA once before it was badly edited with a lot of POV statements and edit warring. I don't review the same article twice. — Indon (reply) — 10:24, 31 March 2007 (UTC)

WP:Civility. WP:Good faith and WP:Wikiquette restrain any response whatsoever from me :) SatuSuro 10:49, 31 March 2007 (UTC)

Block

Orderinchaos 11:15, 31 March 2007 (UTC)

Template:unblock reviewed

You were engaging in quid pro quo GA reviewing and canvassing towards those ends. Your actions were an attempt to game the GA system. As well you knowingly avoided your block with an IP as this revert demonstrates. Very disruptive. User:Netscott/s1.js 14:20, 31 March 2007 (UTC)

Template:unblock reviewed dif

full unblock reasons summary:I see a 24hr blocking on my talkpage which I believe would have expired by now. On block log I see a 48hr for 'sockpuppetry'. Looking at contributions I see I've only updated my own talk page since 10:41, 31 March 2007. Surveying the WP Blocking policy I see mentions of bans up to 24 hours, ... and indefinite bans for the most offensive behaviour. So please determine when the 24 hours has started and when its ended. Sanity-checking from someone other than the original block-imposer is requested. The original ban was for soliciting for a GA-reviewer on non-contributing user talk pages. Oh my

Another offence

Adding "autosodomy" [4] to the list of yoga practices was also pretty disruptive but as I find you've already been blocked I'll just leave as a blot on your track record. --BozMo talk 16:39, 31 March 2007 (UTC)

Yoga is inclusive of all static exercise involving only the body. Autosodomy yoga is within that and autosodomy is itself a yogic exercise. Numerous yoga stances may be maintained in positions where full or partial autosodomy is also attained. And yogic disciplines may assist in attaining autosodomy (for the few and the brave).DavidYork71 16:51, 31 March 2007 (UTC)

Please do not place pornographic content on the yoga page. There is absolutely no reference to this practice in any established form of yoga that I know of. Addition of pornographic content without any form of citation of WP:RS is disruptive behavior. Buddhipriya 18:16, 1 April 2007 (UTC)

in case you didn't know

If you deside to take a break from editing wikipedia again, you can just tag your page with {{wikibreak}} instead of giving an explanation at the top of your talk page. See Wikipedia:Wikibreak for futher information.--Sefringle 23:30, 31 March 2007 (UTC)

Copyright release request to al@solosuck.com

Dear Mr Al Eingang,

this request relates to the attached image for which you are the copyright owner. Would you be willing to release copyright in the image for the purpose of its appearance in the online wikipedia (www.wikipedia.org)? Alternatively, could you provide other free images for this purpose? It is proposed for the image to feature on the 'Autosodomy' article page or the autosodomy subsection of the 'sodomy' article.

The image will appear with such attribution and commentary as you may helpfully provide eg. information about its source.

Any other information about autosodomy culture and practice (attributable to a reliable source for encyclopaedic content purposes) that you may be able to refer me to would also be useful for inclusion in the article.

Yours Sincerely, etc.DavidYork71 06:14, 1 April 2007 (UTC)

Response

Very quick one - firstly, the alleged sockpuppet edits would not be caught by the above link, they only catch edits by this nick, so it's a straw man argument. Secondly, I acted on behalf of community consensus in both of the actions taken and both the discussion leading to my decision, and the results can be found at WP:AN/I. I was in a position to act as I have no connection or history with the page or its subject matter, so could address the actions on their own in accordance with policy. WP:BLOCK clearly indicates a gradually increasing scale of penalties, and I chose the two bottom ones. The appropriate section reads: "Static IPs and logged-in users: start at 24 hours, increase gradually if it starts again." As this relates to a named user, this section and not the one related to dynamic IPs applies. Orderinchaos 14:34, 1 April 2007 (UTC)

Inclusion of pornography in articles

Please read Wikipedia:Pornography before adding further pornography to articles. The picture in question was apparently taken from a porn site, not a yoga institute, and there is no documentation per WP:RS that the performance of the act has anything to do with yoga or that the performer was a "yogi". Buddhipriya 17:04, 3 April 2007 (UTC)

It has everything to do with yoga. See Sodomy#Yoga. It is a yogic discipline, an expression of sexuality, and best described as both at the same time. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 149.135.101.74 (talk) 13:07, 4 April 2007 (UTC).

DOn't remove block warnings

Please do not delete or edit legitimate talk page comments; this is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you.

You removed records of your blocks from here [5] and here [6]. You've actually been told about this before You've also removed your archives. Don't worry, I've replaced them all for you now [7] and [8] --Merbabu 12:37, 4 April 2007 (UTC)