Talk:Arturo 9000
From Homestar Runner Wiki
(Difference between revisions)
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
I recently edited this article to say that Arturo may be either a predecessor of or successor to the [[Happy 8600]], but my edit got removed for being, and I quote, 'Not really notable...'. But the fact remains that since [[email thunder]] very strongly implied that HREmails ran parallel to SBEmails without our knowing, HREmail 62 is very possibly a past email, and therefore, Arturo is thus probably a predecessor to the Happy. What should our official opinion be? Predecessor or successor? --[[Special:Contributions/220.235.114.241|220.235.114.241]] 01:39, 27 January 2009 (UTC) | I recently edited this article to say that Arturo may be either a predecessor of or successor to the [[Happy 8600]], but my edit got removed for being, and I quote, 'Not really notable...'. But the fact remains that since [[email thunder]] very strongly implied that HREmails ran parallel to SBEmails without our knowing, HREmail 62 is very possibly a past email, and therefore, Arturo is thus probably a predecessor to the Happy. What should our official opinion be? Predecessor or successor? --[[Special:Contributions/220.235.114.241|220.235.114.241]] 01:39, 27 January 2009 (UTC) | ||
| + | :Any such interpretation is speculative in nature, which is mainly why I removed it. -[[Special:Contributions/128.103.10.17|128.103.10.17]] 01:44, 27 January 2009 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 01:44, 27 January 2009
Before or after the Happy?
I recently edited this article to say that Arturo may be either a predecessor of or successor to the Happy 8600, but my edit got removed for being, and I quote, 'Not really notable...'. But the fact remains that since email thunder very strongly implied that HREmails ran parallel to SBEmails without our knowing, HREmail 62 is very possibly a past email, and therefore, Arturo is thus probably a predecessor to the Happy. What should our official opinion be? Predecessor or successor? --220.235.114.241 01:39, 27 January 2009 (UTC)
- Any such interpretation is speculative in nature, which is mainly why I removed it. -128.103.10.17 01:44, 27 January 2009 (UTC)
