Template talk:userboxtop

From Homestar Runner Wiki

(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
(Background = White)
(Background = White: excuse me, bridget...)
 
(includes 7 intermediate revisions)
Line 4: Line 4:
:Remember, sign your talk posts with 4 tidles (<nowiki>~~~~</nowiki>). However, I think this is a good idea. {{User:MichaelXX2/sig}} 11:24, 16 April 2009 (UTC)
:Remember, sign your talk posts with 4 tidles (<nowiki>~~~~</nowiki>). However, I think this is a good idea. {{User:MichaelXX2/sig}} 11:24, 16 April 2009 (UTC)
::Can someone please purge the mediawiki cache or something or test it with new cache? I can't seem to see this template with a white BG on userpages. {{User:Iyeru/sig}} 20:45, 20 April 2009 (UTC)
::Can someone please purge the mediawiki cache or something or test it with new cache? I can't seem to see this template with a white BG on userpages. {{User:Iyeru/sig}} 20:45, 20 April 2009 (UTC)
 +
:::[http://hrwiki.org/index.php/Template:userboxtop?action=purge You can do it]. [[Special:Contributions/64.198.255.1|64.198.255.1]] 20:54, 20 April 2009 (UTC)
 +
::::Firstly, there may be people who want it the way it is, secondly, adding a background won't have any effect whatsoever of the location of the edit buttons. Thirdly, i'm not a fan of changing the default appearance or usage of a template after it's been in use for a long time, but i wouldn't be opposed to an optional background color parameter that sets the background to whatever the user wants. {{User:DeFender1031/sig}} 20:59, 20 April 2009 (UTC)
 +
:::::Fine, fine. All in favor of a '''<nowiki>{{{2|transparent}}}</nowiki>'''? {{User:Iyeru/sig}} 21:08, 20 April 2009 (UTC)
 +
::::::That's not what i suggested, and that will break the template. {{User:DeFender1031/sig}} 21:10, 20 April 2009 (UTC)
 +
:::::::Then what do you suggest? Besides leaving it as-is? {{User:Iyeru/sig}} 21:12, 20 April 2009 (UTC)
 +
::::::::Exactly what i just did, see [http://www.hrwiki.org/index.php?title=HRWiki:Sandbox&oldid=644883 this revision] of the sandbox for examples. {{User:DeFender1031/sig}} 21:20, 20 April 2009 (UTC)
 +
:::::::::Thanks a bunch! {{User:Iyeru/sig}} 21:28, 20 April 2009 (UTC)
 +
::::::::::No probalo, myrtle-beth, i'm grad you got all my... particles... {{User:DeFender1031/sig}} 21:32, 20 April 2009 (UTC)

Current revision as of 21:32, 20 April 2009

[edit] Background = White

It would be wise to create an overall background in this box so we can't see through it. Not to mention to make sure that it doesn't push down the edit buttons to below the userbox tower. ColdReactive

Remember, sign your talk posts with 4 tidles (~~~~). However, I think this is a good idea. MichaelXX2 mail_icon.gif link_icon.gif 11:24, 16 April 2009 (UTC)
Can someone please purge the mediawiki cache or something or test it with new cache? I can't seem to see this template with a white BG on userpages. ColdReactive 20:45, 20 April 2009 (UTC)
You can do it. 64.198.255.1 20:54, 20 April 2009 (UTC)
Firstly, there may be people who want it the way it is, secondly, adding a background won't have any effect whatsoever of the location of the edit buttons. Thirdly, i'm not a fan of changing the default appearance or usage of a template after it's been in use for a long time, but i wouldn't be opposed to an optional background color parameter that sets the background to whatever the user wants. — Defender1031*Talk 20:59, 20 April 2009 (UTC)
Fine, fine. All in favor of a {{{2|transparent}}}? ColdReactive 21:08, 20 April 2009 (UTC)
That's not what i suggested, and that will break the template. — Defender1031*Talk 21:10, 20 April 2009 (UTC)
Then what do you suggest? Besides leaving it as-is? ColdReactive 21:12, 20 April 2009 (UTC)
Exactly what i just did, see this revision of the sandbox for examples. — Defender1031*Talk 21:20, 20 April 2009 (UTC)
Thanks a bunch! ColdReactive 21:28, 20 April 2009 (UTC)
No probalo, myrtle-beth, i'm grad you got all my... particles... — Defender1031*Talk 21:32, 20 April 2009 (UTC)