Talk:I'm Sad That...
From Homestar Runner Wiki
(Difference between revisions)
ColdReactive (Talk | contribs) (→Rename: re) |
(→Rename: Banning? No. Moving back, yes.) |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
::The ellipsis is not meant to imply a pause here; it's meant to imply continuation. And whatever happened to waiting for consensus? {{User:Heimstern Läufer/sig}} 08:01, 24 April 2010 (UTC) | ::The ellipsis is not meant to imply a pause here; it's meant to imply continuation. And whatever happened to waiting for consensus? {{User:Heimstern Läufer/sig}} 08:01, 24 April 2010 (UTC) | ||
:::Bleh... move it back if you desire. I won't stop you. Not that I'd care if I got banned here either.... Being banned on UbuntuForums, ReactOS.org, Nuklearpower Forums, hrm... what else could I get banned on -_- {{User:ColdReactive/sig}} 08:05, 24 April 2010 (UTC) | :::Bleh... move it back if you desire. I won't stop you. Not that I'd care if I got banned here either.... Being banned on UbuntuForums, ReactOS.org, Nuklearpower Forums, hrm... what else could I get banned on -_- {{User:ColdReactive/sig}} 08:05, 24 April 2010 (UTC) | ||
| + | ::::Banned? Certainly not. We don't ban people for things like this. I am going to move it back, though, because we haven't achieved consensus. For the record, I oppose the move to a no-ellipsis version because it's grammatically wrong to just leave a subordinating conjunction like "that" hanging. The ellipsis tells us there's something more to come that will complete the sentence. {{User:Heimstern Läufer/sig}} 08:09, 24 April 2010 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 08:09, 24 April 2010
Rename
How about we simply call it "I'm Sad That"? 
That'sBupkis! 01:47, 24 April 2010 (UTC)
- Agreed, moved accordingly as he actually doesn't "pause" after the word "that," and even if he did, I'd question that still.
ColdReactive 07:58, 24 April 2010 (UTC)
- The ellipsis is not meant to imply a pause here; it's meant to imply continuation. And whatever happened to waiting for consensus? Heimstern Läufer
08:01, 24 April 2010 (UTC)
- Bleh... move it back if you desire. I won't stop you. Not that I'd care if I got banned here either.... Being banned on UbuntuForums, ReactOS.org, Nuklearpower Forums, hrm... what else could I get banned on -_- ColdReactive 08:05, 24 April 2010 (UTC)
- Banned? Certainly not. We don't ban people for things like this. I am going to move it back, though, because we haven't achieved consensus. For the record, I oppose the move to a no-ellipsis version because it's grammatically wrong to just leave a subordinating conjunction like "that" hanging. The ellipsis tells us there's something more to come that will complete the sentence. Heimstern Läufer 08:09, 24 April 2010 (UTC)
- Banned? Certainly not. We don't ban people for things like this. I am going to move it back, though, because we haven't achieved consensus. For the record, I oppose the move to a no-ellipsis version because it's grammatically wrong to just leave a subordinating conjunction like "that" hanging. The ellipsis tells us there's something more to come that will complete the sentence. Heimstern Läufer
- Bleh... move it back if you desire. I won't stop you. Not that I'd care if I got banned here either.... Being banned on UbuntuForums, ReactOS.org, Nuklearpower Forums, hrm... what else could I get banned on -_-
- The ellipsis is not meant to imply a pause here; it's meant to imply continuation. And whatever happened to waiting for consensus? Heimstern Läufer
