Talk:Gum
From Homestar Runner Wiki
(Difference between revisions)
(rm tbd, consensus to keep) |
|||
| (includes 2 intermediate revisions) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| - | |||
== Not unique == | == Not unique == | ||
Gum has been mentioned a few times, but not really in a way that's unique or interesting, the notable exception being [[record book]]. Aside from there, this would just be a laundry list of appearances. Really not worth it. {{User:DeFender1031/sig}} 20:23, 23 February 2013 (UTC) | Gum has been mentioned a few times, but not really in a way that's unique or interesting, the notable exception being [[record book]]. Aside from there, this would just be a laundry list of appearances. Really not worth it. {{User:DeFender1031/sig}} 20:23, 23 February 2013 (UTC) | ||
| Line 5: | Line 4: | ||
::I went through the trouble of finding mentions of gum, and actually improving this article. And at least half of the references I could find are unusual. So '''keep'''. {{User:RickTommy/sig}} 04:10, 24 February 2013 (UTC) | ::I went through the trouble of finding mentions of gum, and actually improving this article. And at least half of the references I could find are unusual. So '''keep'''. {{User:RickTommy/sig}} 04:10, 24 February 2013 (UTC) | ||
::: With RickTommy's edit, I'm left kind of in favor. Some of the mentions aren't unusual, but there are enough unusual ones to keep the page. --{{User:Jay/sig}} 10:32, 24 February 2013 (UTC) | ::: With RickTommy's edit, I'm left kind of in favor. Some of the mentions aren't unusual, but there are enough unusual ones to keep the page. --{{User:Jay/sig}} 10:32, 24 February 2013 (UTC) | ||
| + | :::: Yeah, it looks like a '''keep'''er to me as per RickTommy's edit and Jay's comment. — [[User:Ngamer01|Ngamer01]] 17:13, 24 February 2013 (UTC) | ||
| + | ::::: I stand corrected, though I still hesitate to say there's a pattern to the unique uses of it. Regardless, I think there's enough for a keep. {{User:DeFender1031/sig}} 17:34, 24 February 2013 (UTC) | ||
Current revision as of 23:43, 13 July 2014
[edit] Not unique
Gum has been mentioned a few times, but not really in a way that's unique or interesting, the notable exception being record book. Aside from there, this would just be a laundry list of appearances. Really not worth it. — Defender1031*Talk 20:23, 23 February 2013 (UTC)
- Agree, unless someone can add more instances that are notable. Make like Singapore and ban gum (by deleting it)! Heimstern Läufer
00:50, 24 February 2013 (UTC)
- I went through the trouble of finding mentions of gum, and actually improving this article. And at least half of the references I could find are unusual. So keep. RickTommy (edits) 04:10, 24 February 2013 (UTC)
- With RickTommy's edit, I'm left kind of in favor. Some of the mentions aren't unusual, but there are enough unusual ones to keep the page. --Jay (Gobble) 10:32, 24 February 2013 (UTC)
- Yeah, it looks like a keeper to me as per RickTommy's edit and Jay's comment. — Ngamer01 17:13, 24 February 2013 (UTC)
- I stand corrected, though I still hesitate to say there's a pattern to the unique uses of it. Regardless, I think there's enough for a keep. — Defender1031*Talk 17:34, 24 February 2013 (UTC)
- Yeah, it looks like a keeper to me as per RickTommy's edit and Jay's comment. — Ngamer01 17:13, 24 February 2013 (UTC)
- With RickTommy's edit, I'm left kind of in favor. Some of the mentions aren't unusual, but there are enough unusual ones to keep the page. --Jay (Gobble) 10:32, 24 February 2013 (UTC)
- I went through the trouble of finding mentions of gum, and actually improving this article. And at least half of the references I could find are unusual. So keep. RickTommy (edits) 04:10, 24 February 2013 (UTC)
