|
|
(includes 71 intermediate revisions) |
Line 1: |
Line 1: |
- | == Gnome work == | + | {| class="infobox" width="270px" style="float:right;border:black solid 1px;padding: 0.5em; margin: 0.5em 0.5em 1em;" |
| + | |- |
| + | ! align="center" | '''That'sBupkis''' talk archives |
| + | ---- |
| + | |- |
| + | | '''[[User talk:That'sBupkis/Archive09|2007-2009 talk]]'''<br>'''[[User talk:That'sBupkis/Archive10|2010 talk]]''' |
| + | |} |
| | | |
- | First of all, thanks for doing gnome work! There's scarcely an article out there that wouldn't benefit from being gone over with a fine-toothed comb. I was wondering, however, if you'd elaborate a little bit in your edit summaries. "Gnome work" is such a large umbrella, after all. Keep on tranglin'! — [[User:It's dot com|It's dot com]] 02:08, 24 July 2009 (UTC)
| |
| | | |
- | == Image Summary Cleanup == | + | ==Userboxes== |
| + | Hey That'sBupkis, great userboxes, can i ad them to the userbox page? --[[User:Jfilesguy|that guy who is Jfiles]] 01:45, 23 June 2011 (UTC) |
| + | :Sure, go ahead. Wow, your comment is from over a year ago... sorry about that. I've been away for a while, mostly because of the hiatus. Once that sbemail206 thing rolls around I'll probably be more active here. {{User:That'sBupkis/sig}} 18:42, 13 September 2012 (UTC) |
| | | |
- | Hello, That'sBupkis. I see that you've been trying to do image summary cleanups, but you've been actually doing it very and completely wrong. The summary should have no periods, but instead look like this:
| + | == Technical issue == |
- | <blockquote><nowiki> == Summary ==</nowiki><br>
| + | |
- | <nowiki>A description with everything relevant [[linked]] correctly (from [[source toon]])</nowiki>
| + | |
- | </blockquote>
| + | |
- | Some image summaries were correct and then you actually ruined them, like [[:File:Cow on blackboard.png]]. Please go back through all the images and replace it with the appropriate formatting. Thanks, [[Special:Contributions/64.239.192.93|64.239.192.93]] 16:12, 4 August 2009 (UTC)
| + | |
- | :But does, what essentially boils down to having a pair of parenthesis or not, really matter, functionally? -[[Special:Contributions/132.183.138.174|132.183.138.174]] 16:53, 4 August 2009 (UTC)
| + | |
- | ::We're going for a consistent standard here, that was the point of the project's creation. It's also more than that, much of the relevant links were not added, descriptions were not expanded to be as detailed as possible, etc. {{User:DeFender1031/sig}} 16:58, 4 August 2009 (UTC)
| + | |
- | :::I see. -[[Special:Contributions/132.183.138.174|132.183.138.174]] 16:59, 4 August 2009 (UTC)
| + | |
- | ::::A consistent standard is a good thing, and I agree with it. What I don't agree with is the original !anonny's statement that That'sBupkis "ruined" anything. Changing something to non-standard is not ruining it (a rather strong statement), even though it's a mistake, especially since it was reverted quickly. That'sBupkis: I know your image edits were meant in good faith, and I'm glad to see you making them. Still, I suggest reading [[HRWiki:Image Summary Cleanup]] so you better understand the procedures we need you to adhere to. Then you'll be able to help us out well. Thanks, and keep on tranglin'! {{User:Heimstern Läufer/sig}} 17:43, 4 August 2009 (UTC)
| + | |
- | :::::Also please bear in mind what i said about expanding the summaries to include more detail and linking, thanks. {{User:DeFender1031/sig}} 17:57, 4 August 2009 (UTC)
| + | |
- | Hey, That'sBupkis. I just wanted to point out a couple of tweaks ({{p|l=http://www.hrwiki.org/w/index.php?title=File:Cheat_smiling_1.PNG&curid=25660&diff=666034&oldid=666024 here}} and {{p|l=http://www.hrwiki.org/w/index.php?title=File:Cheat_Head_Explosion1.PNG&curid=2399&diff=666030&oldid=666011 here}}) I made to some summaries you recently edited, to help illustrate what we're going for. In the first one, I added more to the description and added another link. In the second one, I made the link more specific and cleaned up the wording some. Note also that there usually {{p|l=http://www.hrwiki.org/w/index.php?title=File:Cheatsuit.png&diff=666047&oldid=666045 doesn't need to be a period}} between the description and the (from <nowiki>[[toon]]</nowiki>) part. Keep on tranglin'! — [[User:It's dot com|It's dot com]] 18:21, 4 August 2009 (UTC)
| + | |
| | | |
- | == Flash Decompiler... HELP!!!!!!!!! ==
| + | Actually, technical issues usually go under "Glitches", though Strong Bad is enough of a grammatical hypocrite to justify moving that fact to "Remarks" anyway. --{{User:Jay/sig}} 23:16, 13 December 2012 (UTC) |
| + | :Okay, I should have said that more clearly. By "goof" I meant like an animation mistake or oversight... [[Teen Girl Squad 10|or something like that]]. {{User:That'sBupkis/sig}} 02:37, 14 December 2012 (UTC) |
| | | |
- | Well, I have it, but can't get the video on it. {{User:Espemon333/sig}} 00:55, 2 September 2009 (UTC)
| + | == Thanks! == |
- | :What do you need decompiled? Maybe I can help. {{User:ColdReactive/sig}} 00:58, 2 September 2009 (UTC)
| + | |
- | ::Well, I didn't have anything specific in mind. If anything, I want to know how it works. {{User:Espemon333/sig}} 01:02, 2 September 2009 (UTC)
| + | Thanks for taking that copy/paste nonsense and knowing what to do with it. It only just occurred to me that some crazy fans have been faithful to the Wiki all through the hiatus and actually know how to write up articles and such. {{unsigned|24.192.11.206|17:33, 9 October 2015}} |
- | :::Do you have linux, Windows or MacOS? {{User:ColdReactive/sig}} 01:04, 2 September 2009 (UTC)
| + | |
- | ::::Windows. {{User:Espemon333/sig}} 01:04, 2 September 2009 (UTC)
| + | |
- | :::::Try this Decompiler: [http://swftools.org SWFTools], unless you already have one. {{User:ColdReactive/sig}} 01:08, 2 September 2009 (UTC)
| + | |
- | ::::::Well I have Trillix. {{User:Espemon333/sig}} 01:09, 2 September 2009 (UTC)
| + | |
- | :::::::Hey, Espemon333. On your userpage, I left you a comment about how to use Flash Decompiler Trillix. If you have anymore questions, just ask. {{User:That'sBupkis/sig}} 01:17, 2 September 2009 (UTC)
| + | |
- | ::::::::Thank you! {{User:Espemon333/sig}} 01:33, 2 September 2009 (UTC)
| + | |
Actually, technical issues usually go under "Glitches", though Strong Bad is enough of a grammatical hypocrite to justify moving that fact to "Remarks" anyway. --Jay (Gobble) 23:16, 13 December 2012 (UTC)
Thanks for taking that copy/paste nonsense and knowing what to do with it. It only just occurred to me that some crazy fans have been faithful to the Wiki all through the hiatus and actually know how to write up articles and such. — 24.192.11.206 (Talk | contribs) 17:33, 9 October 2015 (left unsigned)