Talk:Pulse Interview - 1 Aug 2003
From Homestar Runner Wiki
(response for firebird re:firebird) |
(+comment re: transcription quality, misc.) |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
:I don't see why not... I only link to Matt and Mike once and to few lesser known 'dumb animal characters' further down. Feel free to delete any or all links if you wish- I have no preference on whether they stay or go. --[[User:The Paper|The Paper]] 21:06, 27 Feb 2005 (MST) | :I don't see why not... I only link to Matt and Mike once and to few lesser known 'dumb animal characters' further down. Feel free to delete any or all links if you wish- I have no preference on whether they stay or go. --[[User:The Paper|The Paper]] 21:06, 27 Feb 2005 (MST) | ||
| + | |||
| + | == General Comments == | ||
| + | |||
| + | Now that the links contained in the transcipt have been removed, does anyone else have any general comments regard the quality and the degree to which I transcribed the interview? You may note that in many cases I added ellipsis dots (...) where there was a pause in speech. In many other cases, I used these where Matt, Mike, or Missy ended mid-sentence to start a new one (I never realized how frequently we do this!) and some of these may be removed if more of us prefer to see a dash instead. Other than that, does anyone have any general comments regarding the accuracy of said transcription? I posted a message on the Projects page requesting that [[HRWiki:Projects#TBC_G4techTV_Interview_-_01_Aug_2003|this particular project]] be removed and have yet to get a response, although only a week has gone by. --[[User:The Paper|The Paper]] 15:31, 9 Mar 2005 (MST) | ||
Revision as of 22:31, 9 March 2005
Links in Transcripts?
Are we doing links in transcripts now? →[[User:FireBird|FireBird]]
- I don't see why not... I only link to Matt and Mike once and to few lesser known 'dumb animal characters' further down. Feel free to delete any or all links if you wish- I have no preference on whether they stay or go. --The Paper 21:06, 27 Feb 2005 (MST)
General Comments
Now that the links contained in the transcipt have been removed, does anyone else have any general comments regard the quality and the degree to which I transcribed the interview? You may note that in many cases I added ellipsis dots (...) where there was a pause in speech. In many other cases, I used these where Matt, Mike, or Missy ended mid-sentence to start a new one (I never realized how frequently we do this!) and some of these may be removed if more of us prefer to see a dash instead. Other than that, does anyone have any general comments regarding the accuracy of said transcription? I posted a message on the Projects page requesting that this particular project be removed and have yet to get a response, although only a week has gone by. --The Paper 15:31, 9 Mar 2005 (MST)
