Talk:-'d
From Homestar Runner Wiki
Rogue Leader (Talk | contribs) (Yes. I believe we should redirect this) |
(→Repitition) |
||
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
Yes, a huge majority, if not all, is taken from [[Glossary#D|the glossary]] and, like Lapper said, arrow'd guy. This article best serves as a redirect to one of those two. {{User:Rogue Leader/sig}} 22:02, 31 December 2005 (UTC) | Yes, a huge majority, if not all, is taken from [[Glossary#D|the glossary]] and, like Lapper said, arrow'd guy. This article best serves as a redirect to one of those two. {{User:Rogue Leader/sig}} 22:02, 31 December 2005 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | As I write this, eight separate people have worked on this page in the six days of its existence, none of whom I (the creator of the article) recruited. There is at least some interest in it. I don't really understand why you're so opposed to its existence. It certainly works better as an article than as a category (I made a bad assumption about how many separate articles there might be about it), but I think the notion that it's useless is disingenuous. — [[User:Wfaulk|Wfaulk]] 22:14, 5 January 2006 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 22:14, 5 January 2006
I know that this isn't all of the times "-'d" has occurred -- the glossary lists at least FLOOR TOMMED!, POM-POMMED?, TWELVE-SIDED DIE'D in addition to what's already here, but I can't remember where they occurred. Please add them along with their locations. -- Wfaulk 17:38, 31 December 2005 (UTC)
- I started doing a complete list, but I need to quit now; I'd love for somebody to continue. Make sure to check the release dates; so far they should be chronological. Also, I was thinking after getting the list completed, some references in the text can be taken out (especially those following the phrase "delivered by Arrow'd Guy" which weren't actually). —AbdiViklas 17:57, 31 December 2005 (UTC)
Puh-owned!
Do "pØwned!!" and "p4wned!" count as -'d? --
11945 (Talk/Ctrbs) 18:05, 31 December 2005 (UTC)
Repitition
Is this not, if at least partially, already listed at Arrow'd Guy under the Arrow'd Guy at Work section? — Lapper (talk) 18:25, 31 December 2005 (UTC)
Yes, a huge majority, if not all, is taken from the glossary and, like Lapper said, arrow'd guy. This article best serves as a redirect to one of those two. Rogue Leader / (my talk) 22:02, 31 December 2005 (UTC)
As I write this, eight separate people have worked on this page in the six days of its existence, none of whom I (the creator of the article) recruited. There is at least some interest in it. I don't really understand why you're so opposed to its existence. It certainly works better as an article than as a category (I made a bad assumption about how many separate articles there might be about it), but I think the notion that it's useless is disingenuous. — Wfaulk 22:14, 5 January 2006 (UTC)
