Talk:technology
From Homestar Runner Wiki
(→Has anyone tried...) |
KieferSkunk (Talk | contribs) (→The Cheatbot: Stretch, plus message to VC.) |
||
Line 63: | Line 63: | ||
I'm not going to STUFF this because it'd probably get denied right away, and I'm definitely not going to just add it to the email's fun facts list because it'd be taken off right away. In fact, I'm not even sure if this qualifies as a fun fact...it's fun to me, at least. Anyway, might could Strong Bad's mentioning of robot's purpose (other than destroying Japan) to be to serve hors d'œuvres be a reference to the first scene of The Second Renaissance? Just think about. And no, I'm not going to put a Wikipedia link to it, it's only worth discussing if you've actually seen TSR. --[[User:VolatileChemical|VolatileChemical]] 22:32, 30 January 2006 (UTC) | I'm not going to STUFF this because it'd probably get denied right away, and I'm definitely not going to just add it to the email's fun facts list because it'd be taken off right away. In fact, I'm not even sure if this qualifies as a fun fact...it's fun to me, at least. Anyway, might could Strong Bad's mentioning of robot's purpose (other than destroying Japan) to be to serve hors d'œuvres be a reference to the first scene of The Second Renaissance? Just think about. And no, I'm not going to put a Wikipedia link to it, it's only worth discussing if you've actually seen TSR. --[[User:VolatileChemical|VolatileChemical]] 22:32, 30 January 2006 (UTC) | ||
+ | :If by "Second Renaissance", you're referring to episodes 2 and 3 of Animatrix, then I know what you're talking about. And I think that's a stretch - the idea of service robots that can do all sorts of menial tasks has been around much much longer. {{User:KieferSkunk/sig}} 23:15, 30 January 2006 (UTC) | ||
+ | :PS: Just like when you were making fun of my name, I still think you're making things a lot harder on yourself with all that excess verbiage there. You know how much harder it is to type all that than just to type <nowiki>[[Wikipedia:Animatrix|Animatrix]]</nowiki>? {{User:KieferSkunk/sig}} 23:15, 30 January 2006 (UTC) | ||
==Email Song== | ==Email Song== | ||
Does the email song sound familiar to anyone else? I tried googling some of the key words to figure out which song it comes from, but no luck. It reminds me of something I've heard on a classic rock station though. Maybe fleetwood mac? --[[User:Racerx is Alive|racerx_is_alive]] 22:35, 30 January 2006 (UTC) | Does the email song sound familiar to anyone else? I tried googling some of the key words to figure out which song it comes from, but no luck. It reminds me of something I've heard on a classic rock station though. Maybe fleetwood mac? --[[User:Racerx is Alive|racerx_is_alive]] 22:35, 30 January 2006 (UTC) |
Revision as of 23:15, 30 January 2006
Contents |
Has anyone tried...
- To decode what Strong Bad was saying in binary?The Noid 15:29, 30 January 2006 (UTC)
- You could. This is a handy web-based utility. Short of decoding it yourself. ;) —THE PAPER PREEEOW 15:31, 30 January 2006 (UTC)
- Actually, that doesn't work because Strong Bad doesn't say a number of characters divisable by 8, so all the decoder is doing is adding 0's to make up for the lack of bits. And could whoever put the translation specify which coding you are using? eaglescout1984 30 Jan 2006 15:40 GMT
- Actually ASCII is 7 bit system. -- Crowther
- Well, I'm still trying to find out if he is saying anything. I get lost, though. I have this so far: 1001101 means...m.The Noid 15:44, 30 January 2006 (UTC)
- I don't have time to try again but I got 9945
1 0 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 0 1
213 + 210 + 29 + 27 + 26 24 + 23 + 20 =I R F
15:44, 30 January 2006 (UTC)
- I don't think it adds up to anything now. I've used all of those programs, and they just come out with mainly this:�.The Noid 15:46, 30 January 2006 (UTC)
- If you're using Windows, just open up Calculator, put it in Scientific mode, switch to Binary, enter 1001101101100, then switch it to Decimal mode again. It confirms that Strong Bad's binary translates to 9945 in decimal.
- That said, I don't think his binary speak means anything in particular. —
KieferSkunk (talk) — 16:21, 30 January 2006 (UTC)
- I don't think it adds up to anything now. I've used all of those programs, and they just come out with mainly this:�.The Noid 15:46, 30 January 2006 (UTC)
- I don't have time to try again but I got 9945
- Well, I'm still trying to find out if he is saying anything. I get lost, though. I have this so far: 1001101 means...m.The Noid 15:44, 30 January 2006 (UTC)
- For that matter, has anyone decoded what Strong Bad said in Semaphore? Or was he even doing real semaphore? -Ed
- You could. This is a handy web-based utility. Short of decoding it yourself. ;) —THE PAPER PREEEOW 15:31, 30 January 2006 (UTC)
Homestar Flying
- Why on earth does homestar fly up the left side of the screen? What's that all about? dayve_57
- I'm pretty sure it was just a joke. The way Homestar Runner said "four" made it seem like it was done intentionally. - Joshua 18:47, 30 January 2006 (UTC)
- Yeah, I think it was just a little addition to the ridicul-ous way he raised his pitch.--Robert Benedicio 20:52, 30 January
- I'm pretty sure it was just a joke. The way Homestar Runner said "four" made it seem like it was done intentionally. - Joshua 18:47, 30 January 2006 (UTC)
2006 (UTC)
The Amber Screen
The screen in whihc Strong Bad describes how to select an email address is coloured Amber. this is a reference to a time in the mid 80's when Amber replaced green as the principle colour for monochrome screens. It was supposed to reduce eye strain or something. --"Creepy Pants man"
Clarke's Third Law
It seems to me that Strongbad was referencing Arthur C. Clarke's Third Law with:
The word technology... means... magic. It's basically anything that's really cool that you don't know how it works. And if it breaks, you have to buy a new one. Why, I've got some technology beneath my pants right now! Whoo-ya!
'Arthur C. Clarke's Third Law:' Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic.
--Kitsula
- Oh. I just plain added the thing just now. Incidentally, although I didn't include it, it's even more similar to this corollary. - Octan Jan 30 2006, 3:44PM EST
Catacombs
When SB said "catacombs," the first thing I thought of was the second dungeon in the original Bard's Tale game, which used the first-person viewpoint as well. I'm sure other games had tombs/catacombs as well, since it's a standard RPG element. - Totoro 19:54, 30 January 2006 (UTC)
- I was instantly reminded of DungeonQuest, with the Catacombs expansion pack. The screen saver itself resembles a first-person perspective of an extremely boring game of DungeonQuest (no catacombs). -Ed
- Yeah, but the screen saver itself is just a clone of "3D Maze", which was one of a series of free 3D screen savers supplied with Win98. —
KieferSkunk (talk) — 23:12, 30 January 2006 (UTC)
- Yeah, but the screen saver itself is just a clone of "3D Maze", which was one of a series of free 3D screen savers supplied with Win98. —
I remember having that screensaver when I was a kid.--Robert Benedicio 20:55, 30 January 2006 (UTC)
I can make mine say oboe shoes!
Heh. Does anyone else like it when TBC refrence calculator words in such a funny way? So, one time, in third grade, I remember a few kids typing
7734
on the calculators, and then turned them upside down. As you may of guessed, the H word was on the calculator screen. Very amusing. Especially when we could spell our teacher's first name on the calculator. Weird. So does anybody like calculator words? - Oopsyoubwokeit (not logged in)
- It's a pretty common thing... I've done it before, but I don't particularily like it... - Joshua
- Calculator talk is fun. There's 55378008, 58008, 0.7734, and a lot more I can't remember right now. --אוקאלייליי (Ookelaylay) 21:39, 30 January 2006 (UTC)
The Cheatbot
I'm not going to STUFF this because it'd probably get denied right away, and I'm definitely not going to just add it to the email's fun facts list because it'd be taken off right away. In fact, I'm not even sure if this qualifies as a fun fact...it's fun to me, at least. Anyway, might could Strong Bad's mentioning of robot's purpose (other than destroying Japan) to be to serve hors d'œuvres be a reference to the first scene of The Second Renaissance? Just think about. And no, I'm not going to put a Wikipedia link to it, it's only worth discussing if you've actually seen TSR. --VolatileChemical 22:32, 30 January 2006 (UTC)
- If by "Second Renaissance", you're referring to episodes 2 and 3 of Animatrix, then I know what you're talking about. And I think that's a stretch - the idea of service robots that can do all sorts of menial tasks has been around much much longer. —
KieferSkunk (talk) — 23:15, 30 January 2006 (UTC)
- PS: Just like when you were making fun of my name, I still think you're making things a lot harder on yourself with all that excess verbiage there. You know how much harder it is to type all that than just to type [[Wikipedia:Animatrix|Animatrix]]? —
KieferSkunk (talk) — 23:15, 30 January 2006 (UTC)
Email Song
Does the email song sound familiar to anyone else? I tried googling some of the key words to figure out which song it comes from, but no luck. It reminds me of something I've heard on a classic rock station though. Maybe fleetwood mac? --racerx_is_alive 22:35, 30 January 2006 (UTC)