User talk:Tampo/sig

From Homestar Runner Wiki

Revision as of 07:29, 26 November 2006

um, this need sto be deleted. the thing just made it fo no reason. /Seriously ^(Talk) 19:38, 18 February 2006 (UTC)

No it doesn't. Tampo (^T/C) 22:23, 1 March 2006 (UTC)

How do you like this sig? Tampo talk ^{edit this page} 19:42, 18 February 2006 (UTC)

GREAT! --TheThingé 19:42, 18 February 2006 (UTC)

Do you think I should change my sig to that? Tampo (^T/C) 14:19, 19 February 2006 (UTC)

I would not recommend copying any user's work, as it just leads to complications. If you do, however, under the Creative Commons license, Thunderbird L17 must inform you on how to attribute the work to him, as this is obviously a cut-and-paste example of his signature. — Lapper (talk) 15:42, 25 February 2006 (UTC)

Um... I didn't get a word you said. Seriously. Tampo (^T/C) 00:25, 27 February 2006 (UTC)

I think it means that you have to ask Thunderbird if it's OK to use his sig, and if you need to give credit to him for creating the signature style. --ENUSY 00:32, 27 February 2006 (UTC)

I changed it for the cool person of the month. I will change it back to the normal one (this one Tampo / (my talk) ) this Saturday. Tampo (^T/C) 22:38, 27 February 2006 (UTC)

Stop reverting

Look, you don't know that he would want his sig to look like that. He may want it differently. Plus it's his sig, let him fix it.--H*Bad 07:23, 26 November 2006 (UTC)

H*bad, it's really simple. 1) Sigs require a link to the home page. 2) His did not. 3) He colored his sig to match the standard color of a link. 4) The only difference between the current Tampo sig and the former Tampo sig is that it now complies with policy. What is the issue? - Qermaq - (^T/C)  07:26, 26 November 2006 (UTC)

The issue, is that he needs to fix it himself. Since you know it's his sig... but anyways, you don't know that he wants his sig like that. He may want it completly different that what you did.--H*Bad 07:29, 26 November 2006 (UTC)