User talk:Trogga

From Homestar Runner Wiki

Revision as of 21:57, 24 October 2005

I'll make this short and sweet: Do not engage in a revert war by communicating your points through edit summaries. Find the discussion where the concensus was reached, and express your ideas there. Thank you, BazookaJoe 01:20, 9 Oct 2005 (UTC)

Can you link to that discussion? I can't seem to find it. Sorry for the ruckus, Sam Goldfish 01:29, 9 Oct 2005 (UTC)

It appears User:Thunderbird L17 has applied this change, based on his reasoning at HRWiki:Da Basement#Second Problem. You could propose your idea there. Or, you can talk about it at Talk:Storybook Characters, but be sure to alert him to the discussion. —BazookaJoe 01:59, 9 Oct 2005 (UTC)

Changing usernames

If you are serious about this, then you need to follow the procedure outlined in HRWiki:Changing username. Thanks. — It's dot com 01:17, 10 October 2005 (UTC)

You need to make the request while logged in as Trogga, for security purposes. — It's dot com 19:14, 10 October 2005 (UTC)

Edits

Okay, I agree with you on sibbie, and I reverted it to your version... I don't know why Invisible Robot Fish kept changing that back. On stunt double, however, you yourself wrote the wording that I like, back on September 5. I must therefore assume it was okay with you then. And at the time, I agreed with your edit, which established a good compromise. So please stop revisiting it now. — It's dot com 18:57, 20 October 2005 (UTC)

I saw so many junk edits where he was just deleting and changing stuff that has been fine for months. I agree, that one that you reverted was a bad fact. I R F 18:59, 20 October 2005 (UTC)

Well, in stunt double, I just copied the wording from Unnamed Bad Guy as a placeholder; I wanted the wording to be to be similar, if not the same. Understand? --Sam Goldfish 02:45, 22 October 2005 (UTC)

And it is the same. So there's no real reason to mess with it. Right? — It's dot com 02:52, 22 October 2005 (UTC)

No, it's not. Compare. --Sam Goldfish 02:59, 22 October 2005 (UTC)

Okay, that's the same wording as on Unnamed Bad Guy. What are you trying to say? — It's dot com 03:27, 22 October 2005 (UTC)

I don't like it copied, OK? --Sam Goldfish 03:31, 22 October 2005 (UTC)

But the wording is good, and it's been there for nearly two months. The revision is too watered down. — It's dot com 03:33, 22 October 2005 (UTC)

Fine... --Sam Goldfish 03:34, 22 October 2005 (UTC)

Wooky

Can I take over the Wooky? - Faro1