Talk:Coach Z's Problems
From Homestar Runner Wiki
(Difference between revisions)
It's dot com (Talk | contribs) (separate is equal or better) |
SteakStyles (Talk | contribs) (→Consensus of Creation?) |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
:There was not. I personally think it's probably long enough for it to be separate. {{User:DeFender1031/sig}} 18:56, 26 June 2010 (UTC) | :There was not. I personally think it's probably long enough for it to be separate. {{User:DeFender1031/sig}} 18:56, 26 June 2010 (UTC) | ||
::I could probably go either way. It's a distinct enough topic that linking to a separate page is probably easier than linking to a section, so I'm fine with leaving it on its own page. — [[User:It's dot com|It's dot com]] 19:21, 26 June 2010 (UTC) | ::I could probably go either way. It's a distinct enough topic that linking to a separate page is probably easier than linking to a section, so I'm fine with leaving it on its own page. — [[User:It's dot com|It's dot com]] 19:21, 26 June 2010 (UTC) | ||
| + | :::I'm with DeFender. It's long enough to stay as it is. [[User:SteakStyles|SteakStyles]] 20:14, 20 July 2010 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 20:14, 20 July 2010
Consensus of Creation?
Was there ever a consensus—or even a discussion— to separate this from Coach Z? Personally, I'm neutral to whether this page should stand on it's own, but it just seems odd that nothing was discussed before separating it. StrongAwesome
01:07, 26 June 2010 (UTC)
- There was not. I personally think it's probably long enough for it to be separate. — Defender1031*Talk 18:56, 26 June 2010 (UTC)
- I could probably go either way. It's a distinct enough topic that linking to a separate page is probably easier than linking to a section, so I'm fine with leaving it on its own page. — It's dot com 19:21, 26 June 2010 (UTC)
- I'm with DeFender. It's long enough to stay as it is. SteakStyles 20:14, 20 July 2010 (UTC)
- I could probably go either way. It's a distinct enough topic that linking to a separate page is probably easier than linking to a section, so I'm fine with leaving it on its own page. — It's dot com 19:21, 26 June 2010 (UTC)
